-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump to v5.4.0 #25296
Bump to v5.4.0 #25296
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
Version 13.3 is EOL. See https://www.freebsd.org/releases/ Signed-off-by: Jan Rodák <hony.com@seznam.cz>
As part of our database init, we perform a check of the current values for a few fields (graph driver, graph root, static dir, and a few more) to validate that Libpod is being started with a sane & sensible config, and the user's containers can actually be expected to work. Basically, we take the current runtime config and compare against values cached in the database from the first time Podman was run. We've had some issues with this logic before this year around symlink resolution, but this is a new edge case. Somehow, the database is being loaded with the empty string for some fields (at least graph driver) which is causing comparisons to fail because we will never compare against "" for those fields - we insert the default value instead, assuming we have one. Having a value of "" in the database largely invalidates the check so arguably we could just drop it, but what BoltDB did - and what SQLite does after this patch - is to use the default value for comparison instead of "". This should still catch some edge cases, and shouldn't be too harmful. What this does not do is identify or solve the reason that we are seeing the empty string in the database at all. From my read on the logic, it must mean that the graph driver is explicitly set to "" in the c/storage config at the time Podman is first run and I'm not precisely sure how that happens. Fixes containers#24738 Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99, mheon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
LGTM |
/lgtm |
19cb9f3
into
containers:v5.4
As the title says.
Only three backports, quiet final release.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?