You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am curious about improving performance for splunk ingestion. We have had many customers use this product but run into problems with splunk putting back pressure on the nozzle. We have deduced this to be the cause by observing the nozzle's diode dropping data.
Has the option to write into splunk via batching been explored? In most systems (and therefore I would assume splunk as well), this is the first step to making ingestion faster.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No back pressure on nozzle, as it will throw away logs if the buffer reach a certain limit.
It's just normal behaviour as Splunk could not ingest logs fast enough.
Same as doppler / Loggregator not having back pressure implementing the same diode concept/code.
Not I did'nt check yet the options of using batch ingestion.
I am curious about improving performance for splunk ingestion. We have had many customers use this product but run into problems with splunk putting back pressure on the nozzle. We have deduced this to be the cause by observing the nozzle's diode dropping data.
Has the option to write into splunk via batching been explored? In most systems (and therefore I would assume splunk as well), this is the first step to making ingestion faster.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: