Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Movie cast designation character #156

Open
cjcodeproj opened this issue Aug 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Movie cast designation character #156

cjcodeproj opened this issue Aug 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@cjcodeproj
Copy link
Owner

In movies, characters that don't have names are handled by the <unnamed> element. This proposal is to consider a different element to handle characters that may have a stronger role, but still don't actually have a name.

As an example from the movie Vertigo.

      <role>
       <actor><gn>Lee</gn><fn>Patrick</fn></actor>
       <character>
        <unnamed>Car Owner Mistaken For Madeleine</unnamed>
       </character>
      </role>

In this case Lee Patrick is playing a person with lines, but no given name.

But consider this example from the movie Toy Soldiers.

      <role>
       <actor><gn>Denholt</gn><fn>Elliot</fn></actor>
       <character>
        <unnamed>Headmaster</unnamed>
       </character>
      </role>

In this case, Denholt Elliot also plays a person with lines, but no given name. However, the role has much more dialogue, interactions with multiple characters in multiple scenes, but the character doesn't have a name. The title of Headmaster is a designation of the character's job role, with is different from other unnamed roles like "Bystander" (Reservoir Dogs/1992), "Geek" (Heathers/1988) or "Man on Street" (Gremlins/1984).

The proposal is to create a new element called <designation/> that is structurally identical to <unnamed/> that represents a more involved character that just unfortunately doesn't have a name.

Consider these two examples from A Few Good Men.

      <role>
       <actor><gn>Lawrence</gn><fn>Lowe</fn></actor>
       <character>
        <unnamed>Baliff</unnamed>
       </character>
      </role>
...
      <role>
       <actor><gn>Aaron</gn><fn>Sorkin</fn></actor>
       <character>
        <unnamed>Man in Bar</unnamed>
       </character>
      </role>

The question is, is there a distinction between the labeling of these two roles? Both are characters without names, but only one of them is more likely to be addressed by their designation. IE, it's likely that somebody could say, "Talk to the Bailiff", compared to someone saying "Talk to the Man in Bar".

@cjcodeproj cjcodeproj added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Aug 25, 2024
@cjcodeproj cjcodeproj self-assigned this Aug 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant