-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove HierarchyNotRespected
validation error
#638
Labels
papercut
Small annoyances in the Cedar SDK. Lower priority fixes than bugs. Smaller than a fature request
Comments
May depend on #539, but with that we definitely can. Haven't thought about what we can do given your tweak to the property being tested. |
3 tasks
3 tasks
I have a customer use-case that would benefit from this change. It makes conceptual sense to do this -- impossible policies due to |
2 tasks
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
papercut
Small annoyances in the Cedar SDK. Lower priority fixes than bugs. Smaller than a fature request
Describe the improvement you'd like to request
According to this comment we return the
HierarchyNotRespected
error in some cases where we could soundly type an expression asFalse
. This error was introduced (IIRC) to avoid having to update the Dafny type soundness proof.Now that we've switched to using Lean, and tweaked the validation property being tested, I wonder if we could remove this error variant.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Is this something that you'd be interested in working on?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: