Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: don't mark compensation activity as implicit start #132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

barmac
Copy link
Member

@barmac barmac commented Mar 21, 2024

This is currently marked as violating no-implicit-start rule while compensation activities can never have an incoming sequence flow.

no-implicit-start

@bpmn-io-tasks bpmn-io-tasks bot added the needs review Review pending label Mar 21, 2024
@barmac barmac requested review from a team, philippfromme and marstamm and removed request for a team March 21, 2024 17:09
@nikku nikku merged commit be87309 into main Mar 21, 2024
12 checks passed
@nikku nikku deleted the no-implicit-start-compensation-activity branch March 21, 2024 22:10
@bpmn-io-tasks bpmn-io-tasks bot removed the needs review Review pending label Mar 21, 2024
@nikku
Copy link
Member

nikku commented Mar 22, 2024

Released with v10.2.1. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants