Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DNS validation of Certificates #679

Open
richardkeit opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

DNS validation of Certificates #679

richardkeit opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@richardkeit
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'm frustrated when LZA can create a certificate for me with DNS validation, but even with a suitable hosted zone within the account (where the certificate is created), I still need to validate the certificate myself.

In a multi-account architecture, this is not ideal.

The console provides a "do it for me" button.
Screenshot 2024-12-16 at 11 41 56 am

Describe the feature you'd like
Automatically provide DNS validation of certificates within the same account
Bonus - validation in a different account

Additional context
This may be applicable in design of feature:

@richardkeit richardkeit added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 16, 2024
@bo1984
Copy link

bo1984 commented Dec 16, 2024

Hi @richardkeit! What's likely occurring here, and as you pointed out, the "do it for me" functionality in console is adding the CNAME record to the hosted zone in Route53 as documented. This is a pattern that I think would be useful for large extensive environments especially. We're aiming for extending Route 53 Public and Private Hosted Zones in the early part of next year, and can probably get this added around the same timeline. I will keep this issue open in the meantime should you have any other related questions or concerns.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants