Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Concept and concept-list datatype nodes should not store concept values in Resource Model JSON #11776

Open
bferguso opened this issue Feb 7, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@bferguso
Copy link
Contributor

bferguso commented Feb 7, 2025

When exporting a resource model with a concept or concept-list datatype node, the values of the collection are stored in the node's configuration along with the URL to the Collection. Only the URL, not the values, should be stored in the exported/serialized Resource Model JSON.

@whatisgalen
Copy link
Member

was this done intentionally to make the resource model fully portable even if you lacked the accompanying concept values?

@chiatt
Copy link
Member

chiatt commented Feb 11, 2025

This wasn't intentional. My guess is that the domain datatype and concept datatypes share some code, and somehow the concepts are getting treated like domains.

@whatisgalen
Copy link
Member

There is also this issue where things break because a graph gets imported with broken references to concept collections

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants