You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 4, 2019. It is now read-only.
Currently we put all our TPRs under one api group appscode.com. The result of this is all the api types must live under this one unified repo. This creates coupling among unrelated components. This causes problem with dependency management. So, we should use separate api groups for each of our TPR groups. Here is the proposal:
Voyager: networking.appscode.com
Searchlight: monitoring.appscode.com
Restik: storage.appscode.com
Kubed: cluster.appscode.com
Plan:
Voyager has external users. So, we can't make breaking changes. We will update this when we add support for new TPR to be introduced in Kubernetes 1.7.0
Update Searchlight to move the TPRs (breaking change)
Update Restik to make the breaking change
Kubed's data currently comes from our api server. We want to transform this into a TPR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently we put all our TPRs under one api group
appscode.com
. The result of this is all the api types must live under this one unified repo. This creates coupling among unrelated components. This causes problem with dependency management. So, we should use separate api groups for each of our TPR groups. Here is the proposal:Plan:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: