Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to use Daffodil SBT Plugin 1.3.0 #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

stevedlawrence
Copy link
Member

  • Use the new daffodil-tdml-junit API for tests
  • Remove "daffodil_plugin" setting from the giter8 properties. This setting is supposed to default to the latest version available on maven at the time of running "sbt new", but newer versions of SBT changes how plugins are published to maven such that they don't show up show up on search.maven.org. This means giter8 can't find the latest version. To fix this, this hard codes the plugin version to "1.+", which causes SBT to find the latest version which it can do since it doesn't rely on search.maven.org.
  • Bump scala, sbt, and github actions to their latest versions
  • Update GitHub action to additionally run on Java 21

- Use the new daffodil-tdml-junit API for tests
- Remove "daffodil_plugin" setting from the giter8 properties. This
  setting is supposed to default to the latest version available on
  maven at the time of running "sbt new", but newer versions of SBT
  changes how plugins are published to maven such that they don't show
  up show up on search.maven.org. This means giter8 can't find the
  latest version. To fix this, this hard codes the plugin version to
  "1.+", which causes SBT to find the latest version which it can do
  since it doesn't rely on search.maven.org.
- Bump scala, sbt, and github actions to their latest versions
- Update GitHub action to additionally run on Java 21
@stevedlawrence stevedlawrence merged commit 7a73491 into apache:main Jan 31, 2025
4 checks passed
@stevedlawrence stevedlawrence deleted the daffodil-sbt-1.3.0 branch January 31, 2025 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant