-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Add Optional ID for AMP Packet #813
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
current_index: u32, | ||
) -> Result<String, ContractError> { | ||
// Split the ID into chain_id and index parts at first occurrence of '.' | ||
let (chain_id, index_str) = id |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should probably have 3 elements, chain.block.index
as I think the transaction index is per block?
@@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ pub struct AMPPkt { | |||
/// Any messages associated with the packet | |||
pub messages: Vec<AMPMsg>, | |||
pub ctx: AMPCtx, | |||
pub id: Option<String>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We shouldn't need this anymore, right?
Motivation
Closes: ANDCI-74
Implementation
When the kernel receives an AMPPkt, it checks if an ID exists, if not, it generates one. If it already exists then it leaves it as is (should also validate the ID which is a WIP).
The ID is generated by hashing the string of the appended block, origin, and nonce. Then prepending the hash string with the chain id.
Unsure about the nonce generation, after that's finalized it will be easier to create the validation function for the AMPPkt ID.
Testing
None yet.
Version Changes
kernel
:1.2.1-b.3
->1.2.1-b.4
std
:1.5.1-b.6
->1.5.1-b.7
Checklist