Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update actions #42

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

Update actions #42

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

allthings-bot
Copy link
Member

@allthings-bot allthings-bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Update actions from workflow

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced GitHub Action with optional Node.js version configuration
    • Added ability to specify Node.js runtime version for script execution

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces an optional node_version input parameter to the retry-script GitHub Action. This enhancement allows users to specify a Node.js version when executing the action. When a version is provided, the action will use a local node-manager action to set up the specified Node.js environment before running the retry script. The core retry mechanism remains unchanged, providing flexibility for users who need to run scripts with specific Node.js versions.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/actions/retry-script/action.yml Added optional node_version input parameter and a conditional setup node step using ./.github/actions/node-manager

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant RetryAction
    participant NodeManager
    participant Script

    User->>RetryAction: Trigger with optional node_version
    alt Node version specified
        RetryAction->>NodeManager: Setup specified Node.js version
        NodeManager-->>RetryAction: Node environment ready
    end
    RetryAction->>Script: Execute script with retry mechanism
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/actions/retry-script/action.yml (2)

11-13: Enhance the node_version parameter description

The parameter description could be more specific about accepted values and provide examples.

   node_version:
-    description: 'Provide a node version (if needed)'
+    description: 'Node.js version to use (e.g., "16", "18.x", "20.0.0")'
     required: false

Line range hint 1-1: Update documentation reference

The comment references the GitHub repository for code and docs. Since this is a feature addition, consider updating the documentation to include:

  1. Examples of using the new node_version parameter
  2. Use cases for when Node.js setup is needed
  3. Requirements for the node-manager action
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c636d5 and f1fde86.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/actions/retry-script/action.yml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/actions/retry-script/action.yml (1)

28-32: Verify node-manager action and consider version pinning

A few suggestions to improve reliability:

  1. The action depends on a local node-manager action which should be verified
  2. Consider version pinning the local action for stability

Run this script to verify the local action exists:

Consider making the condition more explicit:

-      if: inputs.node_version
+      if: inputs.node_version != ''
✅ Verification successful

Local action exists and is properly configured

The verification shows that:

  1. The .github/actions/node-manager action exists and is properly configured
  2. It's a composite action that uses the official actions/setup-node@v4 action (which is version-pinned)
  3. The action is simple and focused, just setting up Node.js and installing yarn

The original review concerns are addressed:

  • ✅ Local action dependency is available
  • ✅ The underlying setup-node action is properly version-pinned
  • The conditional syntax if: inputs.node_version is actually fine as GitHub Actions treats empty strings as falsy
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the referenced local action exists
if [ ! -f ".github/actions/node-manager/action.yml" ]; then
  echo "Error: node-manager action not found"
  exit 1
fi

Length of output: 56


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to list all action.yml files to see if the path might be different
fd "action.yml" .github/actions

# Also check the content if it exists
cat .github/actions/node-manager/action.yml 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found"

# Let's also check if there are any similar named directories
fd "node" .github/actions

Length of output: 973

@DmitryMarkov DmitryMarkov merged commit 816deed into master Jan 6, 2025
4 checks passed
@DmitryMarkov DmitryMarkov deleted the actions-spreader-12602391124 branch January 6, 2025 09:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants