Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

just ensure that activity emails have the AirQo logo #4318

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

Baalmart
Copy link
Contributor

@Baalmart Baalmart commented Jan 30, 2025

Description

just ensure that activity emails have the AirQo logo. These activity emails are triggered by Kafka consumer immediately device activities are carried out.

Changes Made

  • just ensure that activity emails have the AirQo logo

Testing

  • Tested locally
  • Tested against staging environment
  • Relevant tests passed: [List test names]

Affected Services

  • Which services were modified:
    • Auth Service

API Documentation Updated?

  • Yes, API documentation was updated
  • No, API documentation does not need updating

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added image attachments to various email methods in the mailer service
    • Enhanced email communication with consistent visual branding across multiple email types
  • Improvements

    • Standardized email configuration by including predefined image attachments in all email generation methods

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a systematic enhancement to the email functionality in the mailer.js module by adding an attachments property to multiple email-related methods. This modification ensures that predefined image attachments are consistently included across various email communication scenarios, ranging from user authentication and verification to activity notifications and system alerts.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/auth-service/utils/common/mailer.js Added attachments property to 30+ email methods, enabling consistent image attachment across different email communication types

Possibly related PRs

Poem

📧 Emails now adorned with grace,
Attachments dancing in each space,
Images riding digital waves,
A visual tale each message paves,
Code's poetry in pixel's embrace! 🖼️

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.24%. Comparing base (ae0420c) to head (5780068).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #4318   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    11.24%   11.24%           
========================================
  Files          156      156           
  Lines        17919    17919           
  Branches       388      388           
========================================
  Hits          2015     2015           
  Misses       15902    15902           
  Partials         2        2           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/auth-service/utils/common/mailer.js 2.43% <ø> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

Auth-service changes in this PR available for preview here

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/auth-service/utils/common/mailer.js (2)

Line range hint 19-63: Improve robustness of attachments configuration.

The attachments configuration has several areas for improvement:

  1. Inconsistent path construction: Some paths use path.join() while others use string concatenation.
  2. No error handling for missing image files.
  3. Hardcoded image paths could be moved to configuration.

Consider applying these improvements:

 const projectRoot = path.join(__dirname, "..", ".."); // Go two levels up
 const imagePath = path.join(projectRoot, "config", "images");
+const fs = require('fs');
+
+// Move to configuration
+const LOGO_CONFIG = {
+  airqo: { filename: "airqoLogo.png", cid: "AirQoEmailLogo" },
+  facebook: { filename: "facebookLogo.png", cid: "FacebookLogo" },
+  youtube: { filename: "youtubeLogo.png", cid: "YoutubeLogo" },
+  twitter: { filename: "Twitter.png", cid: "Twitter" },
+  linkedin: { filename: "linkedInLogo.png", cid: "LinkedInLogo" }
+};
+
+// Create attachments with error handling
+const attachments = Object.entries(LOGO_CONFIG).map(([key, config]) => {
+  const filepath = path.join(imagePath, config.filename);
+  // Verify file exists
+  if (!fs.existsSync(filepath)) {
+    logger.error(`Missing image file: ${filepath}`);
+    return null;
+  }
+  return {
+    filename: config.filename,
+    path: filepath,
+    cid: config.cid,
+    contentDisposition: "inline"
+  };
+}).filter(Boolean);

Line range hint 119-1859: Reduce code duplication in mailer methods.

The mailer methods contain significant code duplication, particularly in subscription checking and email sending logic.

Consider extracting common patterns into reusable functions:

+// Extract common subscription check
+const checkSubscription = async (email, tenant = "airqo") => {
+  const checkResult = await SubscriptionModel(tenant).checkNotificationStatus({
+    email,
+    type: "email"
+  });
+  return checkResult;
+};
+
+// Extract common email sending logic
+const sendEmail = async (mailOptions, skipActualSend = false) => {
+  if (skipActualSend || mailOptions.to === "automated-tests@airqo.net") {
+    return {
+      success: true,
+      message: "email successfully sent",
+      data: [],
+      status: httpStatus.OK
+    };
+  }
+
+  const data = await transporter.sendMail(mailOptions);
+  return handleMailResponse(data);
+};
+
+// Extract common BCC email collection
+const getSubscribedBccEmails = async (emailList, tenant = "airqo") => {
+  if (!emailList) return "";
+  
+  const bccEmails = emailList.split(",").map(email => email.trim());
+  const subscribedEmails = await Promise.all(
+    bccEmails.map(async (email) => {
+      const checkResult = await checkSubscription(email, tenant);
+      return checkResult.success ? email : null;
+    })
+  );
+  
+  return subscribedEmails.filter(Boolean).join(",");
+};

This refactoring would:

  1. Reduce code duplication
  2. Improve maintainability
  3. Make the code more testable
  4. Centralize error handling

Example usage in a mailer method:

 mailer.candidate = async (
   { firstName, lastName, email, tenant = "airqo" } = {},
   next
 ) => {
   try {
-    const checkResult = await SubscriptionModel(tenant).checkNotificationStatus({
-      email,
-      type: "email"
-    });
+    const checkResult = await checkSubscription(email, tenant);
     if (!checkResult.success) {
       return checkResult;
     }

-    let bccEmails = [];
-    if (constants.REQUEST_ACCESS_EMAILS) {
-      bccEmails = constants.REQUEST_ACCESS_EMAILS.split(",");
-    }
-    // ... more BCC email handling
+    const bcc = await getSubscribedBccEmails(constants.REQUEST_ACCESS_EMAILS, tenant);

     const mailOptions = {
       from: { name: constants.EMAIL_NAME, address: constants.EMAIL },
       to: email,
       subject: "AirQo Analytics JOIN request",
       html: msgs.joinRequest(firstName, lastName, email),
       bcc,
       attachments
     };

-    if (email === "automated-tests@airqo.net") {
-      return {
-        success: true,
-        message: "email successfully sent",
-        data: [],
-        status: httpStatus.OK
-      };
-    }
-
-    let response = transporter.sendMail(mailOptions);
-    let data = await response;
-    if (isEmpty(data.rejected) && !isEmpty(data.accepted)) {
-      return {
-        success: true,
-        message: "email successfully sent",
-        data,
-        status: httpStatus.OK
-      };
-    } else {
-      next(new HttpError("Internal Server Error", httpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, {
-        message: "email not sent",
-        emailResults: data
-      }));
-    }
+    return await sendEmail(mailOptions);
   } catch (error) {
     logger.error(`🐛🐛 Internal Server Error ${error.message}`);
     next(
       new HttpError("Internal Server Error", httpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, {
         message: error.message
       })
     );
   }
 };
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/auth-service/utils/common/mailer.js (1)

Line range hint 65-118: Enhance error handling and input validation in utility functions.

The utility functions could benefit from improved error handling and input validation:

Consider these improvements:

 const createMailOptions = ({
   email,
   firstName,
   lastName,
   activityDetails,
   deviceDetails,
   bccEmails,
   activityType,
 } = {}) => {
+  // Validate required inputs
+  if (!email) {
+    throw new Error('Email is required');
+  }
+
   const subject =
     activityType === "recall"
       ? "AirQo Analytics: Device Recall Notification"
       : "AirQo Analytics: Device Deployment Notification";
 
   return {
     from: {
       name: constants.EMAIL_NAME,
       address: constants.EMAIL,
     },
     to: email,
     subject,
     html: msgs.field_activity({
       firstName,
       lastName,
       email,
       activityDetails,
       deviceDetails,
       activityType,
     }),
     bcc: bccEmails,
     attachments: attachments,
   };
 };

 const handleMailResponse = (data) => {
+  if (!data) {
+    throw new HttpError(
+      "Invalid mail response",
+      httpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR
+    );
+  }
+
   if (isEmpty(data.rejected) && !isEmpty(data.accepted)) {
     return { success: true, message: "Email successfully sent", data };
   } else {
     throw new HttpError(
       "Internal Server Error",
       httpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR,
       { message: "Email not sent", emailResults: data }
     );
   }
 };
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae0420c and 5780068.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/auth-service/utils/common/mailer.js (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: build-push-deploy-auth-service
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/auth-service/utils/common/mailer.js (1)

Line range hint 1-1859: Address security considerations in email handling.

Several security aspects need attention:

  1. Email headers could be vulnerable to injection
  2. Attachment paths could be manipulated
  3. BCC email addresses are exposed in the code

Consider implementing these security measures:

  1. Sanitize all email headers and content
  2. Validate and sanitize file paths
  3. Move sensitive email addresses to secure configuration
  4. Implement rate limiting for email sending
  5. Add audit logging for email operations
  6. Consider using email templates from a secure source

Run this security check:

@Baalmart Baalmart merged commit e01ce93 into staging Jan 30, 2025
52 checks passed
@Baalmart Baalmart deleted the hf-activity-emails branch January 30, 2025 15:19
@Baalmart Baalmart mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2025
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant