Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Brand kit updates #2269

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 17, 2023
Merged

Brand kit updates #2269

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 17, 2023

Conversation

AKCodez
Copy link
Contributor

@AKCodez AKCodez commented Nov 16, 2023

No description provided.

…it deletes old one replaces all references to new url
…it deletes old one replaces all references to new url
Copy link

Link check report. 554142 links checked.
Success! No broken links found.

Preview: https://XRPLF.github.io/xrpl-dev-portal/pr-preview/brand-kit/

Style Report

Copy link
Collaborator

@amarantha-k amarantha-k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The local build looked good.
Wondering if the zip files should be under assets instead of the content folder? @mDuo13 what do you think?

@AKCodez
Copy link
Contributor Author

AKCodez commented Nov 16, 2023

The local build looked good. Wondering if the zip files should be under assets instead of the content folder? @mDuo13 what do you think?

I put it in content as that is where it was being hosted before.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't love that this zip has a __MACOSX/ folder at the top and .DS_Store files in every dir, but it's fine I guess.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While not a blocker, I'd prefer that we remove these files as they sometimes can cause problems.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mDuo13 mDuo13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's OK for the brand kit to be in content/ because we're linking people to download it from GitHub via the github.com/.../raw/... link. However, if we moved it under assets/, then we could serve it directly from xrpl.org at a URL like https://xrpl.org/assets/XRPL_Brand_Kit.zip, which might make it easier to track how many times it's been downloaded (using the server access log or something).

dactyl-config.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: tequ <git@tequ.dev>
Copy link

Link check report. 554142 links checked.
Success! No broken links found.

Preview: https://XRPLF.github.io/xrpl-dev-portal/pr-preview/brand-kit/

Style Report

@AKCodez
Copy link
Contributor Author

AKCodez commented Nov 17, 2023

It's OK for the brand kit to be in content/ because we're linking people to download it from GitHub via the github.com/.../raw/... link. However, if we moved it under assets/, then we could serve it directly from xrpl.org at a URL like https://xrpl.org/assets/XRPL_Brand_Kit.zip, which might make it easier to track how many times it's been downloaded (using the server access log or something).

Moved into assets

Copy link

Link check report. 554144 links checked.
Success! No broken links found.

Preview: https://XRPLF.github.io/xrpl-dev-portal/pr-preview/brand-kit/

Style Report

@AKCodez AKCodez merged commit f7a05c8 into master Nov 17, 2023
3 checks passed
@mDuo13 mDuo13 deleted the brand-kit branch November 21, 2023 00:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants