You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At 10.07.2024, 18:48:49, the entire tubmlr network halted at block height 20200073.
Observations
The network disagrees on the hash for block height 20200073.
Some nodes expect 7FE09400054FDF6DE2C7F83A8794720F0350F5C727066247BE60E3DEE5F61B6A and receive 59FEF09BF899CB3342B030A00F09C8D6A3380F94ECF3A9363B2D36B089A0E805
Other nodes the opposite
Block 20200073 contained 2 transactions with nothing out of the ordinary
Same for 20200072
The vote to set an ERC20 to denom mapping had landed in 20200073
Vote implications
With the vote being the only thing suspicious around this time, initial investigation focused on the recent renaming of the module
All test paths in PTN (including a full version update) ran successfully
Furthermore, the denom is actually in the store and queriable (nodes from both sides will have the record in store, as well as the params, so the mismatch doesn't seem to be related to the store or the upgrade)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Timeline
At
10.07.2024, 18:48:49
, the entiretubmlr
network halted at block height20200073
.Observations
20200073
.7FE09400054FDF6DE2C7F83A8794720F0350F5C727066247BE60E3DEE5F61B6A
and receive59FEF09BF899CB3342B030A00F09C8D6A3380F94ECF3A9363B2D36B089A0E805
20200073
contained 2 transactions with nothing out of the ordinary20200072
20200073
Vote implications
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: