Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Develop #654

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

Develop #654

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

Bob-six
Copy link
Collaborator

@Bob-six Bob-six commented Oct 31, 2024

Summary by Sourcery

Fix the read-only field name in the TelegramConnectionSerializer and add a new method for address validation.

Bug Fixes:

  • Fix the read-only field name from 'created_on' to 'created_at' in the TelegramConnectionSerializer.

Enhancements:

  • Add a new method 'validate_address' to the TelegramConnectionSerializer.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR makes minor modifications to the TelegramConnectionSerializer class by updating the read_only_fields list and adding a new validation method for the address field.

Updated class diagram for TelegramConnectionSerializer

classDiagram
    class TelegramConnectionSerializer {
        +Meta
        +validate_address(raise_exception=False)
    }
    class Meta {
        +model: TelegramConnection
        +fields: "__all__"
        +read_only_fields: ["created_at", "pk", "user_profile", "title"]
    }
    TelegramConnectionSerializer --> Meta
    note for TelegramConnectionSerializer "Added validate_address method and updated read_only_fields"
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Updated read_only_fields configuration in the serializer
  • Changed 'created_on' field to 'created_at'
telegram/serializers.py
Added address validation method
  • Implemented a simple validate_address method that always returns True
  • Added optional raise_exception parameter to the validation method
telegram/serializers.py

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@Bob-six Bob-six merged commit 2c76b70 into main Oct 31, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @alimaktabi - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.

Blocking issues:

  • The validate_address method always returns True without performing any actual validation (link)

Overall Comments:

  • The read_only_fields list changes 'created_on' to 'created_at' without explanation. Please verify this matches the actual model field name to avoid breaking existing functionality.
  • The validate_address() method returning True without performing any validation is a security risk. Please implement proper address validation logic.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🔴 Security: 1 blocking issue
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

]
read_only_fields = ["created_at", "pk", "user_profile", "title"]

def validate_address(self, raise_exception=False):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚨 issue (security): The validate_address method always returns True without performing any actual validation

This could allow invalid or malicious Telegram addresses to pass through. Consider implementing proper validation logic for the address field.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant