You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to have functions that return the irrotational and non-divergent components of a given wind field (in u and v form). These quantities have many applications in meteorology, including in the analysis of tropical cyclones, extratropical lows, and larger Rossby Wave dynamics (among I'm sure many others).
So input is a gridded u and v wind field and output is a gridded u and v irrotational wind field or a gridded u and v non-divergent wind field.
As far as a scholarly reference for how exactly to do this, the best I could find after searching for a few minutes seems to be Shukla and Saha (1974).
I am very far from an expert on the math behind irrotational and non-divergent wind computations, and have never done a feature request like this before so I apologize if I have left out some important information somewhere along the way!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be nice to have functions that return the irrotational and non-divergent components of a given wind field (in u and v form). These quantities have many applications in meteorology, including in the analysis of tropical cyclones, extratropical lows, and larger Rossby Wave dynamics (among I'm sure many others).
So input is a gridded u and v wind field and output is a gridded u and v irrotational wind field or a gridded u and v non-divergent wind field.
NCL has a function that does this
It looks like someone has done a version of this for python but apparently it only works with global data and not regional data as per this twitter thread.
As far as a scholarly reference for how exactly to do this, the best I could find after searching for a few minutes seems to be Shukla and Saha (1974).
I am very far from an expert on the math behind irrotational and non-divergent wind computations, and have never done a feature request like this before so I apologize if I have left out some important information somewhere along the way!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: