-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Supernova from main sequence merger product not recorded in BSE_Supernovae #1317
Comments
I believe the problem is that we flag a stellar merger in @ilyamandel can you take a look? It's probably a fairly simple fix, but since you implemented EDIT: It might be as simple as not flagging the stellar merger if we're evolving merger products. @SimonStevenson if I run this:
using COMPAS v03.10.04 I get:
I don't see a SN event, so no reason to put an entry in the SN file. Is that not the result you get? |
Hi @jeffriley you're right about the other system, I just double checked it, I think I must have had a mistake in the way I was checking systems. The main issue is with the merger product. |
@ilyamandel stand down for a bit - I'll be pushing a fix for this in the next hour or so, but it will have some questions for you... |
Fixed in #1320 |
Describe the bug
When using
--evolve-main-sequence-merger TRUE
to evolve main sequence merger products, I am finding that even if the merger product subsequently undergoes a supernova and forms a NS/BH, that event is not recorded in BSE_SupernovaeLabel the issue
Please label the 'severity' and 'urgency' of this issue. You can choose:
urgency_low
- This is a moderately urgent issueseverity_moderate
- This is a minor bug with minimal impactTo Reproduce
For example, a single binary that merges can be run with
Expected behavior
An entry in BSE_Supernovae should be generated for the merger product/all supernovae that occur.
Versioning (please complete the following information):
[EDITED TO REMOVE OTHER SYSTEM]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: