Refactor login page #38
Conversation
…react-scroll-area and @radix-ui/react-separator
WalkthroughThe pull request includes multiple changes across various files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 22
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (37)
frontend/src/app/(main)/layout.tsx (1)
7-10: Consider enhancing the metadata description.The current description "The best dev project generator" could be more professional and descriptive. Consider providing more specific information about what Codefox does.
export const metadata: Metadata = { title: 'Codefox', - description: 'The best dev project generator', + description: 'An intelligent development project generator and scaffolding tool', };frontend/src/app/providers/BaseProvider.tsx (1)
14-25: Consider adding error boundaries and reviewing theme defaults.While the provider composition is correct, consider these improvements:
- Add an error boundary to gracefully handle provider-level errors
- Review the
defaultTheme="dark"setting for accessibility complianceConsider wrapping the providers with an error boundary:
import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary'; export function BaseProviders({ children }: ProvidersProps) { return ( <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Something went wrong</div>}> <ApolloProvider client={client}> {/* ... rest of the providers ... */} </ApolloProvider> </ErrorBoundary> ); }frontend/src/components/ui/separator.tsx (1)
16-28: Consider adding aria-orientation for better accessibilityWhile the component is well-implemented, adding an aria-orientation attribute could improve accessibility for screen readers.
Here's how you could enhance it:
<SeparatorPrimitive.Root ref={ref} decorative={decorative} orientation={orientation} + aria-orientation={orientation} className={cn( 'shrink-0 bg-border', orientation === 'horizontal' ? 'h-[1px] w-full' : 'h-full w-[1px]', className )} {...props} />frontend/src/app/(main)/page.tsx (2)
9-14: Consider adding cleanup for form reference.While the state initialization is correct, consider adding a cleanup function using useEffect to prevent potential memory leaks from the form reference.
+ import { useRef, useState, useEffect } from 'react'; export default function Home() { const [messages, setMessages] = useState<Message[]>([]); const [input, setInput] = useState(''); const formRef = useRef<HTMLFormElement>(null); + useEffect(() => { + return () => { + if (formRef.current) { + formRef.current = null; + } + }; + }, []);
25-39: Add PropTypes and JSDoc documentation.While the component implementation is solid, it would benefit from:
- Adding PropTypes or TypeScript interfaces for the ChatContent component props
- Adding JSDoc documentation to describe the component's purpose and props
+ import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; + + /** + * Home component that implements the main chat interface. + * @returns {JSX.Element} The rendered chat interface + */ export default function Home() {Also, consider creating an interface for the ChatContent props:
interface ChatContentProps { chatId: string; setSelectedModel: (model: string) => void; messages: Message[]; input: string; handleInputChange: (e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => void; handleSubmit: (e: React.FormEvent) => void; loadingSubmit: boolean; stop: () => void; formRef: React.RefObject<HTMLFormElement>; setInput: (input: string) => void; setMessages: (messages: Message[]) => void; }frontend/src/app/hooks/useChatList.ts (2)
6-8: Consider using a more descriptive state variable name and type.Instead of a boolean flag, consider using an enum or timestamp to better represent the update state and its reason.
- const [chatListUpdated, setChatListUpdated] = useState(false); + type UpdateReason = 'INITIAL' | 'NEW_MESSAGE' | 'DELETED' | 'NONE'; + const [updateStatus, setUpdateStatus] = useState<UpdateReason>('NONE');
34-42: Add explicit return type for better type safety.Consider adding an interface for the hook's return type to improve type safety and documentation.
+interface ChatListHookResult { + chats: Chat[]; + loading: boolean; + error: ApolloError | undefined; + chatListUpdated: boolean; + setChatListUpdated: (value: boolean) => void; + refetchChats: () => Promise<ApolloQueryResult<{ getUserChats: Chat[] }>>; +} + -export function useChatList() { +export function useChatList(): ChatListHookResult {frontend/src/components/ui/scroll-area.tsx (1)
26-46: Consider using a more semantic color token for the scroll thumb.The implementation is solid, but using the 'border' color token for the scroll thumb background might not be semantically correct.
Consider using a more appropriate color token:
- <ScrollAreaPrimitive.ScrollAreaThumb className="relative flex-1 rounded-full bg-border" /> + <ScrollAreaPrimitive.ScrollAreaThumb className="relative flex-1 rounded-full bg-muted-foreground/20" />frontend/src/app/(main)/[id]/page.tsx (3)
8-8: Use absolute imports consistently.Consider using absolute imports with the
@/prefix for consistency with other imports.-import { useChatStream } from '../../hooks/useChatStream'; +import { useChatStream } from '@/app/hooks/useChatStream';
27-37: Enhance error handling and loading state management.The current implementation could benefit from:
- More specific error messages
- Loading state handling for better UX
useQuery(GET_CHAT_HISTORY, { variables: { chatId: params.id }, onCompleted: (data) => { if (data?.getChatHistory) { setMessages(data.getChatHistory); } }, onError: (error) => { - toast.error('Failed to load chat history'); + toast.error(`Failed to load chat history: ${error.message}`); }, + onLoading: () => { + // Handle loading state + setMessages([{ role: 'system', content: 'Loading chat history...' }]); + }, });
48-62: Consider improving component encapsulation.Passing state setters (
setInput,setMessages) directly to child components might make state management harder to track and maintain. Consider encapsulating these within specific handler functions.+const handleMessageUpdate = (messages: Message[]) => { + // Add any validation or transformation logic here + setMessages(messages); +}; + +const handleInputUpdate = (input: string) => { + // Add any validation or transformation logic here + setInput(input); +}; return ( <ChatContent chatId={chatId} setSelectedModel={setSelectedModel} messages={messages} input={input} handleInputChange={handleInputChange} handleSubmit={handleSubmit} loadingSubmit={loadingSubmit} stop={stop} formRef={formRef} - setInput={setInput} - setMessages={setMessages} + onInputUpdate={handleInputUpdate} + onMessagesUpdate={handleMessageUpdate} /> );frontend/src/components/chat/chat.tsx (2)
Line range hint
7-24: Consider decomposing ChatContent into smaller components.The component accepts 12 props, which suggests it might be handling too many responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused components to improve maintainability and reusability.
For example, you could:
- Extract the input handling logic into a separate
ChatInputcomponent- Move the message management logic into a
ChatMessageManagercomponent- Create a custom hook for chat-related state management
This would reduce prop drilling and make the code more maintainable.
Also applies to: 25-38
39-53: Remove commented code and track as a GitHub issue.Instead of keeping commented code in the codebase, it would be better to:
- Remove the commented code since it can be retrieved from version control if needed
- Track the message editing feature in a GitHub issue for better visibility and tracking
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the message editing feature implementation?
frontend/src/app/hooks/useModels.ts (2)
71-74: Consider improving readability of the cache logic.The logic is correct, but could be more readable with explicit variable names and comments.
Consider this alternative:
- const currentModels = !shouldUpdateCache() - ? getCachedModels() - : data?.getAvailableModelTags || getCachedModels(); + const currentModels = shouldUpdateCache() + ? data?.getAvailableModelTags || getCachedModels() // Fetch new or fallback to cache + : getCachedModels(); // Use cache if it's still valid
83-87: Consider adding explicit return type for better type safety.The return structure is clean and follows React conventions.
Consider adding an explicit interface:
interface UseModelsReturn { models: string[]; loading: boolean; error?: Error; selectedModel: string | undefined; setSelectedModel: (model: string | undefined) => void; }frontend/package.json (1)
30-32: LGTM! Consider pinning exact versions for better dependency management.The addition of
@radix-ui/react-separatorand the upgrade of@radix-ui/react-scroll-areaalign well with the PR's objective of refactoring the login page layout. These Radix UI primitives are stable choices for implementing the UI components.Consider pinning exact versions instead of using the caret (
^) prefix to ensure consistent builds across environments:- "@radix-ui/react-scroll-area": "^1.2.0", - "@radix-ui/react-separator": "^1.1.0", + "@radix-ui/react-scroll-area": "1.2.0", + "@radix-ui/react-separator": "1.1.0",frontend/src/app/(main)/MainLayout.tsx (2)
14-23: Consider extracting constants and adding documentation.The layout constants could be moved outside the component to improve reusability and maintainability.
Consider applying this refactor:
+const LAYOUT_CONSTANTS = { + DEFAULT_LAYOUT: [30, 160] as const, + NAV_COLLAPSED_SIZE: 10, + MOBILE_BREAKPOINT: 1023, +} as const; + export default function MainLayout({ children, }: { children: React.ReactNode; }) { const [isCollapsed, setIsCollapsed] = useState(false); const [isMobile, setIsMobile] = useState(false); - const defaultLayout = [30, 160]; - const navCollapsedSize = 10; + const { DEFAULT_LAYOUT, NAV_COLLAPSED_SIZE } = LAYOUT_CONSTANTS;
1-98: Consider splitting the layout logic from chat management.The MainLayout component currently handles both layout management and chat-related functionality. Consider splitting these responsibilities into separate components or hooks for better maintainability and testing.
Suggested architecture:
- Create a separate
useLayoutManagerhook for layout/resize logic- Move chat-related logic to a higher-level component
- Keep MainLayout focused on layout structure only
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx (3)
15-22: Consider enhancing loading state handlingThe component shows good separation of concerns by using the
useModelshook. However, the loading state could be handled more gracefully.Consider implementing a loading skeleton or placeholder:
+ import { Skeleton } from '@/components/ui/skeleton'; export default function ChatTopbar() { const [open, setOpen] = React.useState(false); const { models, loading: modelsLoading, setSelectedModel, selectedModel, } = useModels(); + if (modelsLoading) { + return ( + <div className="w-full flex px-4 py-6 items-center justify-center"> + <Skeleton className="w-[300px] h-10" /> + </div> + ); + }
44-45: Improve selected model display fallbackThe fallback text "Loading models..." is used for both the initial loading state and when no model is selected, which might be confusing for users.
Consider using a more descriptive fallback:
- selectedModel || 'Loading models...' + selectedModel || 'Select a model...'
72-81: Enhance accessibility for model selectionThe model selection buttons could benefit from improved accessibility attributes.
Consider these accessibility improvements:
<Button variant="ghost" className={cn( 'w-full justify-start font-normal rounded-none px-3 py-2 h-auto', selectedModel === model && 'bg-accent' )} onClick={() => handleModelChange(model)} + aria-label={`Select ${model} model`} + aria-selected={selectedModel === model} + role="option" > {model} </Button>frontend/src/app/(auth)/login/page.tsx (2)
66-69: Consider reducing animation duration for better UXThe current 1-second duration might feel sluggish. Consider reducing it to 300-500ms for a snappier feel while maintaining smoothness.
- className={`w-full max-w-md px-8 transition-all duration-1000 ease-in-out + className={`w-full max-w-md px-8 transition-all duration-500 ease-in-out
97-100: Extract duplicate input styles to a shared classThe same styles are repeated for both username and password inputs. Consider extracting them to a shared class in your CSS/Tailwind configuration.
Example approach:
// In your CSS/Tailwind config + .input-base { + @apply h-12 rounded-lg border-light-border dark:border-dark-border + bg-light-surface dark:bg-dark-surface + text-light-text-primary dark:text-dark-text-primary + focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-primary-400 dark:focus:ring-primary-500 focus:border-transparent; + } // In your component - className="h-12 rounded-lg border-light-border dark:border-dark-border - bg-light-surface dark:bg-dark-surface - text-light-text-primary dark:text-dark-text-primary - focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-primary-400 dark:focus:ring-primary-500 focus:border-transparent" + className="input-base"Also applies to: 117-120
frontend/src/components/sidebar-item.tsx (4)
26-32: Add JSDoc documentation for the interface.Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose and usage of each prop in the
SideBarItemPropsinterface. This will improve code maintainability and help other developers understand the component's API.+/** + * Props for the SideBarItem component + * @interface SideBarItemProps + * @property {string} id - Unique identifier for the chat + * @property {string} title - Display title of the chat + * @property {boolean} isSelected - Whether this chat is currently selected + * @property {(id: string) => void} onSelect - Callback when chat is selected + * @property {() => void} refetchChats - Callback to refresh the chat list + */ interface SideBarItemProps { id: string; title: string; isSelected: boolean; onSelect: (id: string) => void; refetchChats: () => void; }
59-71: Remove redundant error handling in handleDeleteChat.The try-catch block in
handleDeleteChatis redundant since the mutation already has error handling in its configuration.const handleDeleteChat = async () => { - try { - await deleteChat({ - variables: { - chatId: id, - }, - }); - setIsDialogOpen(false); - } catch (error) { - console.error('Error deleting chat:', error); - toast.error('Failed to delete chat'); - } + await deleteChat({ + variables: { + chatId: id, + }, + }); + setIsDialogOpen(false); };
134-157: Enhance dialog accessibility and user experience.The dialog implementation could benefit from improved accessibility and user feedback during deletion.
Consider these improvements:
<DialogContent> - <DialogHeader className="space-y-4"> + <DialogHeader className="space-y-4" role="alertdialog" aria-describedby="delete-description"> <DialogTitle>Delete chat?</DialogTitle> <DialogDescription> + <span id="delete-description"> Are you sure you want to delete this chat? This action cannot be undone. + </span> </DialogDescription> <div className="flex justify-end gap-2"> <Button variant="outline" onClick={() => setIsDialogOpen(false)}> Cancel </Button> <Button variant="destructive" + disabled={loading} onClick={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); e.stopPropagation(); handleDeleteChat(); }} > - Delete + {loading ? 'Deleting...' : 'Delete'} </Button> </div> </DialogHeader> </DialogContent>
88-96: Improve link accessibility.The chat link could benefit from better accessibility attributes.
<Link href={`/${id}`} className="flex-1 flex gap-3 items-center truncate" + aria-current={isSelected ? 'page' : undefined} + aria-label={`Open chat: ${title || 'New Chat'}`} onClick={handleChatClick} > <div className="flex flex-col"> <span className="text-xs font-normal">{title || 'New Chat'}</span> </div> </Link>frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx (4)
21-21: Consider making role checking more robustThe current implementation might be fragile if roles are inconsistent in casing or have leading/trailing spaces.
Consider this more robust implementation:
-const isUserMessage = (role: string) => role.toLowerCase() === 'user'; +const isUserMessage = (role: string) => role.trim().toLowerCase() === 'user';
36-39: Consider syncing timeout with animation durationThe 100ms timeout might need adjustment to match the animation duration (index * 0.05 + 0.2) for optimal scrolling behavior.
Consider using a computed timeout:
- const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => { + const animationDuration = messages.length * 50 + 200; // matching animation timing + const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => { bottomRef.current?.scrollIntoView({ behavior: 'smooth', block: 'end' }); - }, 100); + }, animationDuration);
75-83: Consider improving image handlingWhile the empty state looks good, there are some potential improvements for the image handling.
Consider these improvements:
- Use environment variables for the image path
- Consider using separate dark/light mode images instead of CSS invert
- Add loading state for the image
+const CODEFOX_LOGO = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_CODEFOX_LOGO || '/codefox.svg'; + <img - src="/codefox.svg" + src={CODEFOX_LOGO} alt="AI" - className="h-24 w-24 aspect-square object-contain dark:invert" + className="h-24 w-24 aspect-square object-contain" + loading="lazy" />
Line range hint
97-112: Consider optimizing animation performanceThe current animation implementation might cause performance issues with large message lists.
Consider these optimizations:
- Use
layoutIdfor smoother transitions- Add virtualization for large message lists
- Memoize message components
Example implementation:
// Create a separate memoized message component const ChatMessage = React.memo(({ message, isEditing, ...props }) => { return ( <motion.div layoutId={message.id} // Add layoutId for smoother transitions // ... other props > {/* ... message content */} </motion.div> ); }); // Use react-window or react-virtualized for large lists import { FixedSizeList } from 'react-window';frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsx (1)
38-40: Userouter.push('/')instead ofwindow.location.hreffor navigationSince you're using Next.js's
useRouter, you can userouter.push('/')to navigate without reloading the entire page, providing a smoother user experience.Apply this diff:
const handleNewChat = useCallback(() => { - window.location.href = '/'; + router.push('/'); }, []);frontend/src/app/hooks/useChatStream.ts (5)
26-32: Consider makingchatIdoptional inUseChatStreamPropsSince
chatIdmay be undefined when starting a new chat, you might consider updating its type tostring | undefinedto accurately reflect its possible absence. This ensures type safety and clarifies thatchatIdmay not always be present.
Line range hint
95-108: Handle potential empty messages array in subscription data updateIn the
setMessagesupdate function, you accessprev[prev.length - 1], which could beundefinedifprevis empty. While you've used optional chaining, it's good practice to ensure that the code handles empty arrays gracefully to avoid any unexpected behavior.Apply this diff to add explicit handling:
const lastMsg = prev[prev.length - 1]; +if (!lastMsg) { + // Handle the case where there are no previous messages + return [ + ...prev, + { + id: chatStream.id, + role: 'assistant', + content, + createdAt: new Date(chatStream.created * 1000).toISOString(), + }, + ]; +}
152-158: Reorder input clearing after validation inhandleSubmitCurrently,
setInput('')is called before validatingcontent. Ifcontentis empty, the input field is cleared unnecessarily. Consider movingsetInput('')after the validation check to prevent this.Apply this diff to reorder the statements:
const content = input; -if (!content.trim() || loadingSubmit) return; -setInput(''); +if (!content.trim() || loadingSubmit) return; +setInput('');
Line range hint
207-218: Add missing dependencies tostopfunction'suseCallbackThe
stopfunction usessetSubscription,setStreamStatus,setLoadingSubmit, andtoast, but onlystreamStatusis included in the dependency array. While React's hooks generally handlesetStatefunctions, it's recommended to include all external variables and functions to prevent any unexpected behaviors.Apply this diff to include missing dependencies:
-}, [streamStatus]); +}, [streamStatus, setSubscription, setStreamStatus, setLoadingSubmit]);
219-225: ExportcurrentChatIdtype asstring | undefinedGiven that
currentChatIdcan be undefined until a chat is created, ensure that any components using this hook handle the possibility of an undefinedcurrentChatId.Apply this diff to update the returned type:
return { loadingSubmit, handleSubmit, handleInputChange, stop, isStreaming: streamStatus === StreamStatus.STREAMING, - currentChatId, + currentChatId: currentChatId as string | undefined, };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
frontend/public/codefox.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngfrontend/public/codefox.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgfrontend/public/ollama.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
backend/package.json(1 hunks)frontend/package.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/(auth)/login/page.tsx(5 hunks)frontend/src/app/(main)/MainLayout.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/(main)/[id]/page.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/(main)/layout.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/(main)/page.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/[id]/page.tsx(0 hunks)frontend/src/app/hooks/useChatList.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/hooks/useChatStream.ts(7 hunks)frontend/src/app/hooks/useModels.ts(3 hunks)frontend/src/app/layout.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/app/page.tsx(0 hunks)frontend/src/app/providers/BaseProvider.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/chat/chat-layout.tsx(0 hunks)frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx(6 hunks)frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/chat/chat.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/components/sidebar-item.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/components/ui/scroll-area.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ui/separator.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- frontend/src/app/[id]/page.tsx
- frontend/src/app/page.tsx
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-layout.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- backend/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (31)
frontend/src/app/(main)/layout.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM! Imports and font setup are well-structured.
The imports and font configuration follow Next.js best practices.
19-25: Verify MainLayout implementation for login page integration.
The Layout component looks correct, but let's verify the MainLayout implementation to ensure it properly handles the login page refactor requirements.
✅ Verification successful
MainLayout implementation is appropriate for login page integration
The MainLayout component is a well-structured layout component that:
- Handles responsive sidebar with resizable panels
- Manages chat-related UI and state
- Doesn't contain any authentication/login logic, which is correct as it should be handled separately
- Is properly imported only in the layout file under review
The implementation aligns well with the login page refactor as it provides a clean separation of concerns, letting authentication be handled at the appropriate level while focusing on layout management.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify MainLayout implementation and its relationship with login functionality
# Check MainLayout implementation
echo "Checking MainLayout implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export default function MainLayout' -A 10
# Check for login-related components/logic in MainLayout
echo "Checking login-related code in MainLayout..."
rg -l "login|auth|sign.?in" ./frontend/src/app/\(main\)/MainLayout.tsx
Length of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to locate and analyze MainLayout
# First, find the MainLayout file
echo "Finding MainLayout file..."
fd MainLayout
# If it exists elsewhere, check its content
echo "Checking MainLayout content..."
rg -l "MainLayout" --type tsx
# Look for exports named MainLayout
echo "Looking for MainLayout exports..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ function MainLayout'
ast-grep --pattern 'export default function MainLayout'
# Check for any MainLayout class or const
echo "Looking for MainLayout declarations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const MainLayout'
ast-grep --pattern 'class MainLayout'
Length of output: 601
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the MainLayout.tsx file content directly
echo "Checking MainLayout.tsx content..."
cat frontend/src/app/\(main\)/MainLayout.tsx
# Also check for any imports of this MainLayout
echo -e "\nChecking files importing MainLayout..."
rg "import.*MainLayout" -l
Length of output: 3154
frontend/src/app/providers/BaseProvider.tsx (3)
9-11: LGTM! Good type safety practice.
The ProvidersProps interface properly types the children prop, following React TypeScript best practices.
18-20: Good addition of system theme support.
The addition of enableSystem prop and the positioning of the Toaster improve the user experience. The implementation is clean and follows best practices.
7-7: Verify the AuthProvider import path.
The import path has been changed to use a parent directory reference. Let's verify this path is correct and consistent with the project structure.
✅ Verification successful
Import path for AuthProvider is correct and consistent
The import path ../AuthProvider in BaseProvider.tsx is correct as AuthProvider.tsx is located at frontend/src/app/AuthProvider.tsx, which is one directory up from the providers directory (frontend/src/app/providers/). The file exists and is properly imported.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence and location of AuthProvider
fd -t f "AuthProvider.tsx" -x echo "Found AuthProvider at: {}"
# Check if there are any other imports of AuthProvider to ensure consistency
rg -l "import.*AuthProvider" --type tsx
Length of output: 191
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for AuthProvider imports using ripgrep without file type restriction
rg -l "import.*AuthProvider"
# Check the content of BaseProvider.tsx to understand the context better
cat frontend/src/app/providers/BaseProvider.tsx
# Check the actual location and content of AuthProvider
cat frontend/src/app/AuthProvider.tsx
Length of output: 2422
frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (2)
26-26: Good addition of suppressHydrationWarning
The suppressHydrationWarning attribute is correctly added to handle potential hydration mismatches between server and client rendering, which is particularly important when dealing with dynamic content or animations.
28-28: Verify BaseProviders implementation
The change from RootProvider to BaseProviders looks good, but let's verify its implementation to ensure all necessary providers are included.
✅ Verification successful
BaseProviders implementation is complete and well-structured
The BaseProviders component includes all essential providers:
- ApolloProvider for GraphQL client
- AuthProvider for authentication
- ThemeProvider for theme management
- Toaster for notifications
The implementation follows a proper nested structure and includes all necessary providers for the application to function correctly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify BaseProviders implementation and its contents
# Expected: Should find the BaseProviders component and its implementation
# Search for BaseProviders implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export function BaseProviders({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
$$$
}'
# Check for any potential provider components that might be missing
rg -l "Provider" --type tsx
Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find the BaseProviders implementation
# Search for BaseProviders using ripgrep without file type restriction
rg -l "BaseProviders"
# Search for Provider-related components
rg -l "Provider"
# Try to find the specific implementation with more context
rg -A 10 "export.*BaseProviders"
Length of output: 1380
frontend/src/components/ui/separator.tsx (4)
1-7: LGTM: Clean and well-organized imports
The imports are properly structured with clear separation between external dependencies and internal utilities. The 'use client' directive is correctly placed at the top.
8-15: LGTM: Well-typed component definition with proper ref forwarding
The component is properly typed using React.forwardRef with correct type inference from the Radix primitive. Default props are sensibly set.
29-31: LGTM: Proper display name and clean export
The display name is correctly set for better debugging experience, and the export is clean and explicit.
1-31: Verify integration with the login page refactor
Since this is part of a login page refactor, let's verify its usage in the related components.
frontend/src/app/(main)/page.tsx (2)
1-8: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.
The imports are properly structured and the 'use client' directive is correctly placed.
16-23: Verify the empty chatId usage.
The empty string passed as chatId might need validation or error handling. Please ensure this is the intended behavior and won't cause issues with chat message persistence or retrieval.
✅ Verification successful
Empty chatId is the expected behavior for new chats
After reviewing the implementation, the empty chatId is intentionally handled in the useChatStream hook. When a new chat is started (chatId is empty), the hook:
- Creates a new chat via
createChatmutation - Updates the URL with the new chat ID
- Starts the chat stream with the new ID
The code includes proper error handling and state management for both new and existing chats. No issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of useChatStream to verify chatId handling
rg -A 5 "useChatStream.*chatId"
Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the useChatStream hook definition
ast-grep --pattern 'export function useChatStream($_) {
$$$
}'
# Also search for any usage of useChatStream
rg "useChatStream"
# And let's look at the hook implementation directly
fd "useChatStream" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 19670
frontend/src/app/hooks/useChatList.ts (1)
1-4: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured with external dependencies first, followed by internal imports using absolute paths.
frontend/src/components/ui/scroll-area.tsx (3)
1-7: LGTM! Proper setup with necessary imports.
The component is correctly set up as a client-side component with appropriate imports.
48-48: LGTM! Clean exports.
The exports are properly structured, making both components available for use.
8-24: Verify the ScrollArea viewport height behavior.
The implementation looks good and follows React best practices. However, the viewport's height is set to 100% which requires the parent container to have a defined height for proper scrolling behavior.
Let's check if there are any potential height-related issues in the usage:
✅ Verification successful
ScrollArea viewport height is properly handled in its usage
The ScrollArea component is used correctly with an explicitly defined height in its parent container. In the found usage at frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx, the ScrollArea is given a fixed height of 320px through the className prop: <ScrollArea className="h-[320px]">. This ensures proper scrolling behavior as recommended.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ScrollArea usage to verify parent height definitions
rg -l "ScrollArea" | xargs rg -A 5 -B 5 "ScrollArea"
Length of output: 6236
frontend/src/app/(main)/[id]/page.tsx (1)
39-47: LGTM!
The chat stream hook implementation and usage is clean and well-structured.
frontend/src/components/chat/chat.tsx (1)
56-58: Verify the removal of props from ChatTopbar and ChatList.
The removal of several props from these components could impact their functionality:
ChatTopbarpreviously receivedsetSelectedModel,chatId,messages, andsetMessagesChatListhad additional props removed
Let's verify these changes:
✅ Verification successful
Props removal has been properly handled through hooks and component refactoring
The verification shows that the prop changes are valid:
ChatTopbarnow uses theuseModelshook to access model-related functionality instead of receiving propsChatListprops have been properly updated to only include the necessarymessages,loadingSubmit, andonMessageEditprops- The changes reflect a clean refactoring that moves state management to hooks and contexts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if ChatTopbar and ChatList components still reference the removed props
echo "Checking ChatTopbar implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ function ChatTopbar($_) { $$$' -f frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx
echo "Checking ChatList implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ function ChatList($_) { $$$' -f frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx
Length of output: 731
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using ripgrep to check the component implementations
echo "Checking ChatTopbar implementation:"
rg -A 10 "export.*ChatTopbar" frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx
echo "Checking ChatList implementation:"
rg -A 10 "export.*ChatList" frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx
# Also check for any prop type definitions
echo "Checking ChatTopbar props:"
rg "interface.*ChatTopbarProps|type.*ChatTopbarProps" frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx
echo "Checking ChatList props:"
rg "interface.*ChatListProps|type.*ChatListProps" frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx
Length of output: 1272
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the complete ChatListProps interface and see if there are any other usages
echo "Complete ChatListProps definition:"
rg -A 5 "interface ChatListProps" frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx
# Let's also check if ChatTopbar uses any hooks or context that might handle the previously passed props
echo "ChatTopbar hooks and context usage:"
rg "use[A-Z]|context" frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx
# Check if the removed props are handled through context in the chat component
echo "Context usage in chat.tsx:"
rg "use[A-Z]|context" frontend/src/components/chat/chat.tsx
Length of output: 850
frontend/src/app/hooks/useModels.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Clean state management implementation.
The state initialization with undefined is appropriate as it correctly represents the initial loading state before models are available.
Also applies to: 14-16
75-80: Verify model selection behavior on model list updates.
The current implementation might lead to unexpected behavior if currentModels changes after the initial selection. Consider whether you want to:
- Preserve the user's selection when models are updated
- Reset selection if the selected model becomes unavailable
- Update selection if the model list changes significantly
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have enough context about how the model selection is handled throughout the application.
The current model selection behavior is correctly implemented
The implementation is actually safe because:
- The model selection is properly managed through the
useModelshook which is the single source of truth - The selected model is preserved across components via state management
- The auto-selection only happens when there's no selected model (
!selectedModel), preventing unwanted resets - Manual model selection is handled separately in
chat-topbar.tsxwith proper persistence to localStorage
The current behavior ensures a good user experience by:
- Auto-selecting the first model only when no selection exists
- Preserving user selections through state and localStorage
- Allowing explicit model changes through the UI
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other components that might modify the models list
rg -l "getAvailableModelTags" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find model-related code
# 1. Search for model-related state updates
rg "setCurrentModels|setSelectedModel" --type ts -A 5
# 2. Look for model-related API calls or data fetching
rg "models.*fetch|fetch.*models" --type ts -A 5
# 3. Search for components that might modify the model list
rg "currentModels" --type ts -A 5
Length of output: 7274
frontend/src/app/(main)/MainLayout.tsx (1)
1-13: LGTM! Imports and directives are well-organized.
The imports are properly structured and the 'use client' directive is correctly placed at the top of the file.
frontend/src/app/(auth)/login/page.tsx (3)
22-27: LGTM: Clean mount state implementation
The mount state implementation follows React best practices for handling entrance animations.
71-73: LGTM: Semantic and accessible heading implementation
Good use of semantic HTML and proper theme support.
Line range hint 1-141: Verify form submission after styling changes
The UI enhancements look good, but please verify that:
- Form submission still works as expected with the new styling
- Error states are clearly visible in both light and dark themes
- Loading states provide clear feedback to users
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the login functionality and its tests.
Let me check the auth implementation and frontend tests to better understand the login functionality.
Let me check the useAuth hook implementation since it's crucial for the login functionality.
Based on the comprehensive review of the auth implementation, backend tests, and the useAuth hook, I can now provide the final response regarding the login page's styling changes.
Form submission and error handling remain fully functional after styling changes
The login functionality is properly integrated with:
- Form submission through the useAuth hook
- Error state handling and display
- Loading state feedback
- Proper authentication flow with token validation
The styling changes maintain all the essential functionality while improving the UI:
- Error messages use appropriate styling with red background and text
- Loading state is reflected in the button text and disabled state
- Form inputs maintain focus states and accessibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any test files related to the login page
fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.ts . | grep -i "login"
Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the login component's test coverage and implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'describe($_, $_)' backend/src/user/__tests__/dto/login-user.input.spec.ts
# Check for any frontend tests that might be in a different location
fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.ts . | grep -i "auth"
# Look for any Cypress or E2E tests
fd -e cy.ts -e cy.js -e e2e.ts -e e2e.js . | grep -i "login\|auth"
# Check the useAuth hook implementation since it's crucial for the login functionality
ast-grep --pattern 'export function useAuth() {
$$$
}'
# Check if there are any existing snapshot tests
fd . -e snap | grep -i "login\|auth"
Length of output: 20448
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the auth spec implementation
cat backend/src/auth/auth.spec.ts
# Look for the useAuth hook implementation
rg -l "useAuth" frontend/src/app/hooks/
# Check for any frontend test setup files
fd -e setup.ts -e setup.js . | grep -i "test"
# Look for any test utilities related to auth
rg -l "test.*auth" frontend/src/
Length of output: 9252
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the useAuth hook implementation
cat frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts
# Look for any related test files in the frontend
rg -l "login.*test" frontend/src/
# Check if there are any Cypress component tests
fd -e cy.tsx -e cy.ts . | grep -i "login"
# Look for any test utilities or mocks related to auth
rg -l "mock.*auth" frontend/src/
Length of output: 4275
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx (1)
15-19: LGTM: Well-structured interface definition
The ChatListProps interface is clear and properly typed, with good separation of required and optional props.
frontend/src/app/hooks/useChatStream.ts (5)
189-198: Confirm dependency array in finishChatResponse's useCallback
The finishChatResponse function depends on streamStatus. Ensure that all state variables and functions used within the callback are included in the dependency array to maintain consistency.
Verify that all dependencies are correctly included:
setLoadingSubmitsetSubscriptionsetStreamStatusstreamStatus
If any are missing, add them to the dependency array.
Line range hint 76-126: Efficient handling of chat stream subscription
The implementation of the useSubscription hook efficiently manages the chat stream, updates messages appropriately, and handles edge cases like streaming status and completion.
Line range hint 152-187: handleSubmit function correctly manages chat initiation
The handleSubmit function effectively handles form submission, input validation, and initiates the chat creation or streaming process based on the currentChatId.
200-205: Proper use of useCallback in handleInputChange
The handleInputChange function is correctly memoized with useCallback, and its dependency array includes all necessary dependencies.
Line range hint 207-218: stop function appropriately stops the chat stream
The stop function correctly handles stopping the chat stream and provides user feedback via a toast notification.
| export const viewport: Viewport = { | ||
| width: 'device-width', | ||
| initialScale: 1, | ||
| maximumScale: 1, | ||
| userScalable: false, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Restore user scaling for accessibility compliance.
The current viewport configuration disables user scaling (userScalable: false) and locks the scale to 1, which creates significant accessibility issues:
- Prevents users with visual impairments from zooming
- Violates WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 1.4.4 (Resize text)
- May make the application unusable for some users
Apply this change to restore accessibility:
export const viewport: Viewport = {
width: 'device-width',
initialScale: 1,
- maximumScale: 1,
- userScalable: false,
+ maximumScale: 5,
+ userScalable: true,
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const viewport: Viewport = { | |
| width: 'device-width', | |
| initialScale: 1, | |
| maximumScale: 1, | |
| userScalable: false, | |
| }; | |
| export const viewport: Viewport = { | |
| width: 'device-width', | |
| initialScale: 1, | |
| maximumScale: 5, | |
| userScalable: true, | |
| }; |
| export const viewport: Viewport = { | ||
| width: 'device-width', | ||
| initialScale: 1, | ||
| maximumScale: 1, | ||
| userScalable: 1, | ||
| userScalable: false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reconsider disabling user scaling for accessibility reasons
Setting userScalable: false and limiting maximumScale prevents users from zooming the page, which creates accessibility issues for users with visual impairments. This violates WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 1.4.4 (Resize text).
Apply this diff to restore user scaling:
export const viewport: Viewport = {
width: 'device-width',
initialScale: 1,
- maximumScale: 1,
- userScalable: false,
+ minimumScale: 1,
+ maximumScale: 5,
+ userScalable: true,
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const viewport: Viewport = { | |
| width: 'device-width', | |
| initialScale: 1, | |
| maximumScale: 1, | |
| userScalable: 1, | |
| userScalable: false, | |
| export const viewport: Viewport = { | |
| width: 'device-width', | |
| initialScale: 1, | |
| minimumScale: 1, | |
| maximumScale: 5, | |
| userScalable: true, |
| const handleRefetch = useCallback(() => { | ||
| refetch(); | ||
| }, [refetch]); | ||
|
|
||
| const handleChatListUpdate = useCallback((value: boolean) => { | ||
| setChatListUpdated(value); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling to refetch operation.
The refetch operation should handle potential errors and provide feedback to the user.
const handleRefetch = useCallback(() => {
- refetch();
+ return refetch().catch((error) => {
+ console.error('Failed to refetch chats:', error);
+ // Consider using a toast or notification system
+ throw error;
+ });
}, [refetch]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const handleRefetch = useCallback(() => { | |
| refetch(); | |
| }, [refetch]); | |
| const handleChatListUpdate = useCallback((value: boolean) => { | |
| setChatListUpdated(value); | |
| }, []); | |
| const handleRefetch = useCallback(() => { | |
| return refetch().catch((error) => { | |
| console.error('Failed to refetch chats:', error); | |
| // Consider using a toast or notification system | |
| throw error; | |
| }); | |
| }, [refetch]); | |
| const handleChatListUpdate = useCallback((value: boolean) => { | |
| setChatListUpdated(value); | |
| }, []); |
| const sortedChats = useMemo(() => { | ||
| const chats = chatData?.getUserChats || []; | ||
| return [...chats].sort( | ||
| (a: Chat, b: Chat) => | ||
| new Date(b.createdAt).getTime() - new Date(a.createdAt).getTime() | ||
| ); | ||
| }, [chatData?.getUserChats]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add date validation to prevent sorting errors.
The current date comparison doesn't handle invalid dates, which could cause runtime errors.
const sortedChats = useMemo(() => {
const chats = chatData?.getUserChats || [];
return [...chats].sort(
- (a: Chat, b: Chat) =>
- new Date(b.createdAt).getTime() - new Date(a.createdAt).getTime()
+ (a: Chat, b: Chat) => {
+ const dateA = new Date(a.createdAt);
+ const dateB = new Date(b.createdAt);
+ if (isNaN(dateA.getTime()) || isNaN(dateB.getTime())) {
+ console.error('Invalid date encountered in chat sorting');
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return dateB.getTime() - dateA.getTime();
+ }
);
}, [chatData?.getUserChats]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const sortedChats = useMemo(() => { | |
| const chats = chatData?.getUserChats || []; | |
| return [...chats].sort( | |
| (a: Chat, b: Chat) => | |
| new Date(b.createdAt).getTime() - new Date(a.createdAt).getTime() | |
| ); | |
| }, [chatData?.getUserChats]); | |
| const sortedChats = useMemo(() => { | |
| const chats = chatData?.getUserChats || []; | |
| return [...chats].sort( | |
| (a: Chat, b: Chat) => { | |
| const dateA = new Date(a.createdAt); | |
| const dateB = new Date(b.createdAt); | |
| if (isNaN(dateA.getTime()) || isNaN(dateB.getTime())) { | |
| console.error('Invalid date encountered in chat sorting'); | |
| return 0; | |
| } | |
| return dateB.getTime() - dateA.getTime(); | |
| } | |
| ); | |
| }, [chatData?.getUserChats]); |
| const { | ||
| data: chatData, | ||
| loading, | ||
| error, | ||
| refetch, | ||
| } = useQuery<{ getUserChats: Chat[] }>(GET_USER_CHATS, { | ||
| fetchPolicy: chatListUpdated ? 'network-only' : 'cache-first', | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the findings, I can now provide a final response:
Consider using Apollo cache updates instead of network-only fetch policy
The current implementation uses a network-only fetch policy when chatListUpdated is true, which is inefficient. While the codebase has GraphQL subscriptions set up (mainly for chat streaming), there's no proper cache management for chat list updates.
- Add cache update logic in the mutation that modifies the chat list to update the
GET_USER_CHATSquery data - Remove the
chatListUpdatedconditional fetch policy and rely on Apollo's cache - Example implementation:
update(cache, { data }) {
cache.modify({
fields: {
getUserChats(existingChats = []) {
// Update logic here
}
}
});
}🔗 Analysis chain
Improve fetch policy strategy and error handling.
The current implementation might cause unnecessary network requests when toggling chatListUpdated. Consider using Apollo's cache updates or subscription for real-time updates instead.
Let's check if subscriptions are already set up in the project:
Let's examine the subscription implementations to understand if they're already being used for chat updates.
Let's check how chat updates are currently being handled in the codebase to provide a complete recommendation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for GraphQL subscription setup
rg -l "subscription" --type ts
Length of output: 253
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check subscription implementations in frontend
rg -A 10 "subscription" frontend/src/graphql/request.ts
rg -A 10 "subscription" frontend/src/app/hooks/useChatStream.ts
# Check if there are any chat-related subscriptions
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = gql`
subscription {
$$$
}
`'
Length of output: 1428
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for chat update mutations and cache updates
rg -A 5 "updateChat|addChat|deleteChat" frontend/src/graphql/request.ts
# Check for cache update implementations
rg -B 2 -A 5 "update.*Cache|writeQuery|modify" frontend/src/
Length of output: 1172
| @@ -141,89 +70,39 @@ | |||
| </div> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null check for chats before accessing chats.length
If chats is null or undefined, accessing chats.length will cause a runtime error. Consider adding a null check to prevent this.
Apply this diff:
- {chats.length > 0 && (
+ {chats && chats.length > 0 && (Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| export default memo(Sidebar, (prevProps, nextProps) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| prevProps.isCollapsed === nextProps.isCollapsed && | ||
| prevProps.isMobile === nextProps.isMobile && | ||
| prevProps.currentChatId === nextProps.currentChatId && | ||
| prevProps.chatListUpdated === nextProps.chatListUpdated && | ||
| prevProps.loading === nextProps.loading && | ||
| prevProps.error === nextProps.error && | ||
| JSON.stringify(prevProps.chats) === JSON.stringify(nextProps.chats) | ||
| ); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using JSON.stringify to compare chats in the custom memo comparison function
Using JSON.stringify for deep equality checks can be inefficient and may cause performance issues. Consider using a deep comparison utility like lodash.isequal for better performance and reliability.
Apply this diff:
+import isEqual from 'lodash.isequal';
export default memo(Sidebar, (prevProps, nextProps) => {
return (
prevProps.isCollapsed === nextProps.isCollapsed &&
prevProps.isMobile === nextProps.isMobile &&
prevProps.currentChatId === nextProps.currentChatId &&
prevProps.chatListUpdated === nextProps.chatListUpdated &&
prevProps.loading === nextProps.loading &&
prevProps.error === nextProps.error &&
- JSON.stringify(prevProps.chats) === JSON.stringify(nextProps.chats)
+ isEqual(prevProps.chats, nextProps.chats)
);
});Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| onError: () => { | ||
| toast.error('Failed to create chat'); | ||
| setStreamStatus(StreamStatus.IDLE); | ||
| setLoadingSubmit(false); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Include error details in onError handlers for better debugging
Currently, the onError handlers provide generic error messages to the user. Including the error details in logs can aid in debugging and provide more context about the failures.
Apply this diff to log error details:
// In the `createChat` mutation
-onError: () => {
+onError: (error) => {
toast.error('Failed to create chat');
+ console.error('Create chat error:', error);
setStreamStatus(StreamStatus.IDLE);
setLoadingSubmit(false);
},
// In the `startChatStream` function
} catch (err) {
toast.error('Failed to start chat');
+ console.error('Error starting chat stream:', err);
setStreamStatus(StreamStatus.IDLE);
finishChatResponse();
}Also applies to: 141-145
| const [loadingSubmit, setLoadingSubmit] = useState(false); | ||
| const [streamStatus, setStreamStatus] = useState<StreamStatus>( | ||
| StreamStatus.IDLE | ||
| ); | ||
| const [currentChatId, setCurrentChatId] = useState<string>(chatId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update currentChatId type to handle undefined chatId
The useState hook initializes currentChatId with chatId, which may be undefined. To accommodate this, update the type to useState<string | undefined>(chatId) to prevent potential type inconsistencies.
Apply this diff to adjust the type:
-const [currentChatId, setCurrentChatId] = useState<string>(chatId);
+const [currentChatId, setCurrentChatId] = useState<string | undefined>(chatId);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const [currentChatId, setCurrentChatId] = useState<string>(chatId); | |
| const [currentChatId, setCurrentChatId] = useState<string | undefined>(chatId); |
| chatId: targetChatId, | ||
| message, | ||
| model: selectedModel, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
selectedModel is properly handled but could be undefined initially
The verification revealed that while selectedModel is a required prop in useChatStream, there are potential edge cases where it could be undefined:
- In the main page (
page.tsx), it usesselectedModeldirectly fromuseModels()which initializes it asundefined - In the chat page (
[id]/page.tsx), it's initialized withmodels[0] || 'Loading models'
To prevent potential issues:
- Add a default model fallback in
useModels - Add runtime validation in
useChatStreamto ensureselectedModelis not undefined
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure selectedModel is always defined
The selectedModel prop is used to set the model in the input object for starting the chat stream. If selectedModel is undefined, it could lead to unexpected behavior when initiating a chat.
To confirm that selectedModel is always provided, run the following script:
This script lists all files where useChatStream is used without the selectedModel prop. Ensure that no files are returned by this script.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all usages of `useChatStream` include the `selectedModel` prop.
# Test: Search for `useChatStream` invocations missing `selectedModel`.
# Expected: No instances where `selectedModel` is missing.
rg 'useChatStream\(\{[^}]*\}\)' -l | xargs grep -L 'selectedModel'
Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find usages of useChatStream
# First, find all files that import or use useChatStream
rg "useChatStream" -l
# Then let's look at the actual usage contexts
rg "useChatStream" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 3743
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the useModels hook to see how selectedModel is initialized and managed
rg -l "useModels"
rg "useModels" -A 10 -B 10
# Also check if selectedModel is required in the type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
selectedModel: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 9220
adding animation
refacator fronend layout struct
Screen.Recording.2024-11-02.at.07.10.45.mov
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
ScrollAreaandScrollBarfor improved scrolling functionality.Separatorcomponent for visual separation in the UI.SideBarItemcomponent for managing chat functionalities within the sidebar.ChatPagecomponent for client-side chat interactions.MainLayoutcomponent to enhance the app's layout structure.Enhancements
LoginPagewith improved styling and transition effects.ChatListcomponent to allow users to edit messages directly.MainLayout.Bug Fixes
Chores