update common path #34
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a comprehensive refactor of the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| @@ -1,161 +1,146 @@ | |||
| import path from 'path'; | |||
| import os from 'os'; | |||
| import { name } from '../../package.json'; | |||
| import { existsSync, mkdirSync, promises } from 'fs-extra'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the import and usage of promises from 'fs-extra'
The fs-extra module does not export a promises object. Instead, its methods return promises directly. Importing promises from 'fs-extra' and using methods like promises.writeFile will not work as expected.
To fix this, import the necessary methods directly from 'fs-extra' and use them without the promises namespace.
Apply this diff to adjust the imports and usage:
-import { existsSync, mkdirSync, promises } from 'fs-extra';
+import { existsSync, mkdirSync, writeFile, readFile, unlink, readdir } from 'fs-extra';
...
export const writeProjectContent = async (
userId: string,
projectId: string,
fileName: string,
content: string,
): Promise<void> => {
const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName);
- await promises.writeFile(contentPath, content, 'utf8');
+ await writeFile(contentPath, content, 'utf8');
};
...
export const readProjectContent = async (
userId: string,
projectId: string,
fileName: string,
): Promise<string> => {
const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName);
- return promises.readFile(contentPath, 'utf8');
+ return readFile(contentPath, 'utf8');
};
...
export const deleteProjectContent = async (
userId: string,
projectId: string,
fileName: string,
): Promise<void> => {
const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName);
if (existsSync(contentPath)) {
- await promises.unlink(contentPath);
+ await unlink(contentPath);
}
};
...
export const cleanTempDir = async (): Promise<void> => {
const tempDir = getTempDir();
- const files = await promises.readdir(tempDir);
+ const files = await readdir(tempDir);
await Promise.all(
- files.map((file) => promises.unlink(path.join(tempDir, file))),
+ files.map((file) => unlink(path.join(tempDir, file))),
);
};Also applies to: 93-95, 103-105, 113-115, 126-131
| export const getRootDir = (): string => ensureDir(ROOT_DIR); | ||
|
|
||
| // Configuration Paths | ||
| export const getConfigDir = (): string => | ||
| ensureDir(path.join(getRootDir(), 'config')); | ||
| export const getConfigPath = (configName: string): string => | ||
| path.join(getConfigDir(), `${configName}.json`); | ||
|
|
||
| // Models Directory | ||
| export const getModelsDir = (): string => | ||
| ensureDir(path.join(getRootDir(), 'models')); | ||
| export const getModelPath = (modelName: string): string => | ||
| path.join(getModelsDir(), modelName); | ||
|
|
||
| // Project-Specific Paths | ||
| export const getProjectsDir = (): string => | ||
| ensureDir(path.join(getRootDir(), 'projects')); | ||
| export const getProjectPath = (projectId: string): string => | ||
| ensureDir(path.join(getProjectsDir(), projectId)); | ||
| export const getProjectSourceDir = (projectId: string): string => | ||
| ensureDir(path.join(getProjectPath(projectId), 'src')); | ||
| export const getProjectGeneratedDir = (projectId: string): string => | ||
| ensureDir(path.join(getProjectPath(projectId), 'generated')); | ||
| export const getProjectTestsDir = (projectId: string): string => | ||
| ensureDir(path.join(getProjectPath(projectId), 'tests')); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor directory accessor functions to reduce code duplication
The functions for accessing directories (e.g., getConfigDir, getModelsDir, getProjectsDir, etc.) follow a repetitive pattern of constructing a path and ensuring the directory exists. Refactoring these functions can reduce code duplication and enhance maintainability.
Consider creating a higher-order function or a factory function to generate these accessors:
// Helper function to create directory accessors
const createDirAccessor = (baseDirGetter: () => string, dirName: string): (() => string) => {
return () => ensureDir(path.join(baseDirGetter(), dirName));
};
// Base directory accessor
export const getRootDir = (): string => ensureDir(ROOT_DIR);
// Using the helper function to create accessors
export const getConfigDir = createDirAccessor(getRootDir, 'config');
export const getModelsDir = createDirAccessor(getRootDir, 'models');
export const getProjectsDir = createDirAccessor(getRootDir, 'projects');
// Project-specific subdirectories
const createProjectDirAccessor = (subDirName: string): ((projectId: string) => string) => {
return (projectId: string) => ensureDir(path.join(getProjectPath(projectId), subDirName));
};
export const getProjectSourceDir = createProjectDirAccessor('src');
export const getProjectGeneratedDir = createProjectDirAccessor('generated');
export const getProjectTestsDir = createProjectDirAccessor('tests');This approach centralizes the directory creation logic and simplifies the addition of new directory accessors in the future.
backend/src/config/common-path.ts
Outdated
| const hashUserId = (userId: string): string => { | ||
| return createHash('md5').update(userId).digest('hex'); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use a more secure hash function in hashUserId
The hashUserId function currently uses MD5, which is considered cryptographically weak due to collision vulnerabilities. For better security and to reduce the risk of hash collisions, consider using a stronger hash function like SHA-256.
Apply this diff to use SHA-256 instead of MD5:
const hashUserId = (userId: string): string => {
- return createHash('md5').update(userId).digest('hex');
+ return createHash('sha256').update(userId).digest('hex');
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const hashUserId = (userId: string): string => { | |
| return createHash('md5').update(userId).digest('hex'); | |
| }; | |
| const hashUserId = (userId: string): string => { | |
| return createHash('sha256').update(userId).digest('hex'); | |
| }; |
backend/src/config/common-path.ts
Outdated
| export const getTempDir = (): string => { | ||
| const tempDir = path.join(ROOT_DIR, '.codefox', 'temp'); | ||
| if (!existsSync(tempDir)) { | ||
| mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true }); | ||
| } | ||
| return tempDir; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix redundant directory nesting in getTempDir function
The getTempDir function constructs tempDir by appending .codefox to ROOT_DIR, which already includes .codefox. This results in a path like ~/.codefox/.codefox/temp, introducing an unintended redundant directory nesting.
Apply this diff to correct the path:
export const getTempDir = (): string => {
- const tempDir = path.join(ROOT_DIR, '.codefox', 'temp');
+ const tempDir = path.join(ROOT_DIR, 'temp');
if (!existsSync(tempDir)) {
mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true });
}
return tempDir;
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const getTempDir = (): string => { | |
| const tempDir = path.join(ROOT_DIR, '.codefox', 'temp'); | |
| if (!existsSync(tempDir)) { | |
| mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true }); | |
| } | |
| return tempDir; | |
| }; | |
| export const getTempDir = (): string => { | |
| const tempDir = path.join(ROOT_DIR, 'temp'); | |
| if (!existsSync(tempDir)) { | |
| mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true }); | |
| } | |
| return tempDir; | |
| }; |
backend/src/config/common-path.ts
Outdated
| const CLIENT_CACHE_DIR = path.resolve( | ||
| __dirname, | ||
| '../../frontend/.codefox-client/.cache', | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Path resolution for CLIENT_CACHE_DIR needs adjustment
The current path resolution is problematic for the following reasons:
- The
.codefox-clientdirectory doesn't exist in the frontend directory structure - The path resolution using
__dirname/../../frontendis fragile, especially in a production build where the directory structure may differ - The code shows
mkdirSyncusage but the relative path may not resolve correctly in different environments
Recommendations:
- Use an environment variable or configuration file to define the cache directory path
- Consider using an absolute path or a path relative to the user's home directory for the cache
- Ensure the cache directory is created with proper error handling
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the correctness of CLIENT_CACHE_DIR path resolution
The CLIENT_CACHE_DIR is defined using path.resolve(__dirname, '../../frontend/.codefox-client/.cache'). Ensure that __dirname resolves to the expected directory at runtime, especially if the code is packaged or the directory structure changes. This will prevent potential issues with path resolution in different environments.
Run the following script to verify the resolved path:
Check if the output path matches the intended location of the client cache directory.
Let me verify the directory structure and related configurations to ensure this path resolution is correct.
Let me check one more thing to verify how this cache directory is being used and created.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that CLIENT_CACHE_DIR resolves to the correct path.
# Print the resolved CLIENT_CACHE_DIR path.
node -e "console.log(require('path').resolve(__dirname, '../../frontend/.codefox-client/.cache'));"
Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual directory structure and package.json
fd -t d frontend
fd -t d .codefox-client
cat package.json || true
cat backend/package.json || true
Length of output: 3288
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other references to this cache directory
rg -g '!*.{lock,md}' -i "codefox-client.*cache"
Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the build configuration and deployment scripts for path handling
fd -e ts -e js -t f config
fd -t f tsconfig.json
cat backend/tsconfig.json || true
Length of output: 876
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any file system operations or cache directory creation logic
rg -g '*.{ts,js}' "mkdir|ensureDir.*codefox-client"
ast-grep --pattern 'fs.$_($$$codefox$$$)'
Length of output: 349
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the frontend directory structure and configuration
ls -la frontend/ 2>/dev/null || true
cat frontend/package.json || true
Length of output: 4234
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
backend/src/config/common-path.ts (1)
46-49: Consider using environment variables for database paths.The database path is hardcoded within the application directory. For better flexibility across different environments (development, staging, production), consider making the database location configurable through environment variables.
frontend/src/config/common-path.ts (3)
2-2: Remove unused import 'os'The
osmodule is imported but not used in the code. Consider removing it to keep the code clean.
65-67: Consider using a more secure hash algorithmThe
hashUserIdfunction uses MD5, which is not recommended for security-sensitive applications due to vulnerabilities. If the hash is used for directory naming and collisions are acceptable, this may be fine. Otherwise, consider using SHA-256 for better security and collision resistance.Apply this diff to use SHA-256:
- return createHash('md5').update(userId).digest('hex'); + return createHash('sha256').update(userId).digest('hex');
70-70: Rename the 'exists' function to avoid confusionExporting a function named
existsmight cause confusion with other global functions or deprecated Node.js methods. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive likefileExists.Apply this diff:
-export const exists = (filePath: string): boolean => existsSync(filePath); +export const fileExists = (filePath: string): boolean => existsSync(filePath);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
backend/src/config/common-path.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/config/common-path.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
backend/src/config/common-path.ts (3)
7-8: LGTM: Well-defined constants for application paths.
The constants APP_NAME and ROOT_DIR are appropriately defined and follow the standard pattern for application configuration.
11-16: LGTM: Well-implemented directory creation utility.
The ensureDir utility function follows best practices with proper error handling and recursive directory creation.
78-90: LGTM: Well-structured project paths accessor.
The getProjectStructure function provides a clean and type-safe way to access all project-related paths in a single call.
frontend/src/config/common-path.ts (1)
1-4: Verify Node.js module usage in frontend code
The code imports Node.js modules like 'path', 'fs-extra', and 'crypto', which are not available in a browser environment. Please confirm that this code is intended to run in a Node.js environment (e.g., Electron or server-side rendering).
| path.join(this.getProjectPath(projectId), 'generated'), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static getProjectTestsDir(projectId: string): string { | ||
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getProjectPath(projectId), 'tests')); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Database | ||
| */ | ||
| public static getDatabaseDir(): string { | ||
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'data')); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static getDatabasePath(): string { | ||
| this.getDatabaseDir(); // Ensure database directory exists | ||
| return path.join(this.getDatabaseDir(), 'codefox.db'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Configuration | ||
| */ | ||
| public static getConfigDir(): string { | ||
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'config')); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static getConfigPath(configName: string): string { | ||
| this.getConfigDir(); // Ensure config directory exists | ||
| return path.join(this.getConfigDir(), `${configName}.json`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Cache | ||
| */ | ||
| public static getCacheDir(): string { | ||
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'cache')); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Logs | ||
| */ | ||
| public static getLogsDir(): string { | ||
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'logs')); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Temporary files | ||
| */ | ||
| public static getTempDir(): string { | ||
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'temp')); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Templates | ||
| */ | ||
| public static getTemplatesDir(): string { | ||
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'templates')); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static getPromptTemplatePath(templateName: string): string { | ||
| this.getTemplatesDir(); // Ensure templates directory exists | ||
| return path.join(this.getTemplatesDir(), `${templateName}.txt`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Utility Methods | ||
| */ | ||
| public static resolvePath(...pathSegments: string[]): string { | ||
| const resolvedPath = path.join(this.getRootDir(), ...pathSegments); | ||
| return this.ensureDir(path.dirname(resolvedPath)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static exists(filePath: string): boolean { | ||
| return existsSync(filePath); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static async cleanTempDir(): Promise<void> { | ||
| const tempDir = this.getTempDir(); | ||
| const files = await promises.readdir(tempDir); | ||
| await Promise.all( | ||
| files.map((file) => promises.unlink(path.join(tempDir, file))), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static getProjectStructure(projectId: string): { | ||
| root: string; | ||
| src: string; | ||
| generated: string; | ||
| tests: string; | ||
| } { | ||
| return { | ||
| root: this.getProjectPath(projectId), | ||
| src: this.getProjectSourceDir(projectId), | ||
| generated: this.getProjectGeneratedDir(projectId), | ||
| tests: this.getProjectTestsDir(projectId), | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling to cleanTempDir function.
The function should handle potential errors during directory cleanup:
- Check if tempDir exists before reading
- Handle errors during file deletion
- Consider adding logging for debugging purposes
export const cleanTempDir = async (): Promise<void> => {
const tempDir = getTempDir();
+ if (!existsSync(tempDir)) {
+ return;
+ }
const files = await promises.readdir(tempDir);
- await Promise.all(
- files.map((file) => promises.unlink(path.join(tempDir, file))),
- );
+ try {
+ await Promise.all(
+ files.map(async (file) => {
+ const filePath = path.join(tempDir, file);
+ try {
+ await promises.unlink(filePath);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error(`Failed to delete ${filePath}:`, error);
+ }
+ }),
+ );
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to clean temp directory:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const cleanTempDir = async (): Promise<void> => { | |
| const tempDir = getTempDir(); | |
| const files = await promises.readdir(tempDir); | |
| await Promise.all( | |
| files.map((file) => promises.unlink(path.join(tempDir, file))), | |
| ); | |
| /** | |
| * Internal helper to ensure a directory exists before returning its path | |
| * @param dirPath The directory path to check/create | |
| * @returns The same directory path | |
| */ | |
| private static ensureDir(dirPath: string): string { | |
| if (!existsSync(path.dirname(dirPath))) { | |
| this.ensureDir(path.dirname(dirPath)); | |
| } | |
| if (!existsSync(dirPath)) { | |
| mkdirSync(dirPath, { recursive: true }); | |
| } | |
| return dirPath; | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Root Directory | |
| */ | |
| public static getRootDir(): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(CodeFoxPaths.ROOT_DIR); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Models Directory | |
| */ | |
| public static getModelsDir(): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'models')); | |
| } | |
| public static getModelPath(modelName: string): string { | |
| return path.join(this.getModelsDir(), modelName); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Projects Directory | |
| */ | |
| public static getProjectsDir(): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'projects')); | |
| } | |
| public static getProjectPath(projectId: string): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getProjectsDir(), projectId)); | |
| } | |
| public static getProjectSourceDir(projectId: string): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getProjectPath(projectId), 'src')); | |
| } | |
| public static getProjectGeneratedDir(projectId: string): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir( | |
| path.join(this.getProjectPath(projectId), 'generated'), | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| public static getProjectTestsDir(projectId: string): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getProjectPath(projectId), 'tests')); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Database | |
| */ | |
| public static getDatabaseDir(): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'data')); | |
| } | |
| public static getDatabasePath(): string { | |
| this.getDatabaseDir(); // Ensure database directory exists | |
| return path.join(this.getDatabaseDir(), 'codefox.db'); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Configuration | |
| */ | |
| public static getConfigDir(): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'config')); | |
| } | |
| public static getConfigPath(configName: string): string { | |
| this.getConfigDir(); // Ensure config directory exists | |
| return path.join(this.getConfigDir(), `${configName}.json`); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Cache | |
| */ | |
| public static getCacheDir(): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'cache')); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Logs | |
| */ | |
| public static getLogsDir(): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'logs')); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Temporary files | |
| */ | |
| public static getTempDir(): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'temp')); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Templates | |
| */ | |
| public static getTemplatesDir(): string { | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.join(this.getRootDir(), 'templates')); | |
| } | |
| public static getPromptTemplatePath(templateName: string): string { | |
| this.getTemplatesDir(); // Ensure templates directory exists | |
| return path.join(this.getTemplatesDir(), `${templateName}.txt`); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Utility Methods | |
| */ | |
| public static resolvePath(...pathSegments: string[]): string { | |
| const resolvedPath = path.join(this.getRootDir(), ...pathSegments); | |
| return this.ensureDir(path.dirname(resolvedPath)); | |
| } | |
| public static exists(filePath: string): boolean { | |
| return existsSync(filePath); | |
| } | |
| public static async cleanTempDir(): Promise<void> { | |
| const tempDir = this.getTempDir(); | |
| const files = await promises.readdir(tempDir); | |
| await Promise.all( | |
| files.map((file) => promises.unlink(path.join(tempDir, file))), | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| public static getProjectStructure(projectId: string): { | |
| root: string; | |
| src: string; | |
| generated: string; | |
| tests: string; | |
| } { | |
| return { | |
| root: this.getProjectPath(projectId), | |
| src: this.getProjectSourceDir(projectId), | |
| generated: this.getProjectGeneratedDir(projectId), | |
| tests: this.getProjectTestsDir(projectId), | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| export const cleanTempDir = async (): Promise<void> => { | |
| const tempDir = getTempDir(); | |
| if (!existsSync(tempDir)) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| const files = await promises.readdir(tempDir); | |
| try { | |
| await Promise.all( | |
| files.map(async (file) => { | |
| const filePath = path.join(tempDir, file); | |
| try { | |
| await promises.unlink(filePath); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error(`Failed to delete ${filePath}:`, error); | |
| } | |
| }), | |
| ); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to clean temp directory:', error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }; |
| // Vector Database (INDEX) Path | ||
| export const getIndexDir = (): string => | ||
| ensureDir(path.join(getRootDir(), 'INDEX')); | ||
| export const getIndexFilePath = (indexFileName: string): string => | ||
| path.join(getIndexDir(), indexFileName); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The verification confirms that the INDEX directory is hardcoded to be created under the user's home directory (~/.APP_NAME/INDEX). This is problematic for Docker deployments because:
- Container's home directory is ephemeral and data will be lost when container restarts
- No environment variable override is available for the path configuration
- No Docker volume configurations were found in the repository
Recommendations:
- Make the ROOT_DIR configurable via environment variable with home directory as fallback
- Add documentation for required volume mounts in Docker deployments
- Consider moving to a more container-friendly default location like
/data/APP_NAME
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify vector database compatibility with Docker deployments.
The INDEX directory path is set relative to the user's home directory. This might cause issues in containerized environments where the home directory might not be persistent or accessible.
Let me gather more information about how the INDEX directory is being used and if there are any Docker-related configurations.
Let me check one more thing - the definition of ROOT_DIR constant which is crucial for understanding the base path configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Docker-related files and INDEX path usage
rg -g 'Dockerfile*' -g 'docker-compose*' "INDEX|index"
rg -g '!*.{lock,md}' "getIndexDir|getIndexFilePath"
Length of output: 512
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Docker-related files
fd -e dockerfile -e yml -e yaml
# Check the implementation of getRootDir which is used in getIndexDir
rg -A 5 "getRootDir" backend/src/config/common-path.ts
# Check for any volume mounts or persistent storage configurations
fd -e dockerfile -e yml -e yaml -x grep -l "volume\|VOLUME\|persist"
Length of output: 1636
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the ROOT_DIR definition
rg "ROOT_DIR.*=" backend/src/config/common-path.ts
# Check if there are any environment variables being used for path configuration
rg -g '!*.{lock,md}' "process.env.*(?:DIR|PATH|ROOT)"
Length of output: 166
frontend/src/config/common-path.ts
Outdated
| export const writeProjectContent = async ( | ||
| userId: string, | ||
| projectId: string, | ||
| fileName: string, | ||
| content: string | ||
| ): Promise<void> => { | ||
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | ||
| await promises.writeFile(contentPath, content, 'utf8'); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const readProjectContent = async ( | ||
| userId: string, | ||
| projectId: string, | ||
| fileName: string | ||
| ): Promise<string> => { | ||
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | ||
| return promises.readFile(contentPath, 'utf8'); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const deleteProjectContent = async ( | ||
| userId: string, | ||
| projectId: string, | ||
| fileName: string | ||
| ): Promise<void> => { | ||
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | ||
| if (existsSync(contentPath)) { | ||
| await promises.unlink(contentPath); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Adjust content file operations to use updated paths
After including the 'content' directory in getProjectContentPath, ensure that writeProjectContent, readProjectContent, and deleteProjectContent handle the updated path correctly. This change will maintain consistency in where content files are stored.
frontend/src/config/common-path.ts
Outdated
| export const getProjectContentPath = ( | ||
| userId: string, | ||
| projectId: string, | ||
| fileName: string | ||
| ): string => { | ||
| return path.join(getProjectCacheDir(userId, projectId), fileName); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Include 'content' directory in 'getProjectContentPath'
The getProjectContentPath function does not include the 'content' directory in its returned path, while getProjectStructure adds it. This inconsistency might lead to files being stored in unexpected locations. Please ensure the 'content' directory is included consistently across all functions.
Apply this diff to include the 'content' directory:
- return path.join(getProjectCacheDir(userId, projectId), fileName);
+ return path.join(getProjectCacheDir(userId, projectId), 'content', fileName);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const getProjectContentPath = ( | |
| userId: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| fileName: string | |
| ): string => { | |
| return path.join(getProjectCacheDir(userId, projectId), fileName); | |
| }; | |
| export const getProjectContentPath = ( | |
| userId: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| fileName: string | |
| ): string => { | |
| return path.join(getProjectCacheDir(userId, projectId), 'content', fileName); | |
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
frontend/src/config/common-path.ts (3)
5-7: Consider making paths configurable via environment variablesThe hard-coded paths might not work correctly in production builds or different deployment environments. Consider making these paths configurable through environment variables.
Example approach:
-const FRONTEND_ROOT_DIR = path.resolve(__dirname, '../.codefox-client'); +const FRONTEND_ROOT_DIR = process.env.CODEFOX_CLIENT_DIR || path.resolve(__dirname, '../.codefox-client');
20-55: LGTM! Consider adding integration testsThe directory management functions are well-structured and follow a clear hierarchy. The content directory issue from previous reviews has been properly addressed.
Consider adding integration tests to verify the directory structure creation:
describe('Directory Structure', () => { it('should create nested directory structure', async () => { const userId = 'test-user'; const projectId = 'test-project'; const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, 'test.txt'); expect(existsSync(path.dirname(contentPath))).toBe(true); }); });
58-60: Consider using a more robust hashing algorithmWhile MD5 is sufficient for directory naming, consider using a more modern algorithm like SHA-256 for better collision resistance.
-return createHash('md5').update(userId).digest('hex'); +return createHash('sha256').update(userId).digest('hex').substring(0, 32);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
backend/src/config/common-path.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/config/common-path.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
frontend/src/config/common-path.ts (1)
10-15: LGTM!
The utility function is well-implemented with proper error handling and TypeScript typing.
backend/src/config/common-path.ts (2)
11-16: LGTM! Well-structured utility function.
The ensureDir function is well-implemented, following the single responsibility principle and providing consistent directory creation behavior throughout the module.
81-93: LGTM! Well-structured project accessor.
The getProjectStructure function is well-implemented with:
- Clear type definitions
- Reuse of existing functions
- Convenient access to all project-related paths
| // ----------- We need path traverse Protection after we decide how we read and store the file !!!!!!!!!!!!! ------------ | ||
| // ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the analysis of the code, I can now provide a final response:
Critical: Path traversal protection needed for file operations
The codebase shows active file operations in common-path.ts without path traversal protection:
writeProjectContent,readProjectContent, anddeleteProjectContentfunctions operate on files using user-providedfileName- No path sanitization is implemented despite the warning comment
Implement path traversal protection immediately before the file operations:
function sanitizePath(fileName: string): string {
// Normalize and verify the path is just a filename
const normalized = path.normalize(fileName);
if (normalized.includes(path.sep) || normalized.includes('..')) {
throw new Error('Invalid filename: must not contain path separators or traversal sequences');
}
return normalized;
}Add this to all file operation functions:
const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, sanitizePath(fileName));🔗 Analysis chain
Critical: Implement path traversal protection
The comment indicates a known security vulnerability. Path traversal attacks could allow access to files outside the intended directory structure.
Let's verify current path handling:
Consider implementing this protection immediately:
function sanitizePath(filePath: string): string {
const normalized = path.normalize(filePath);
if (normalized.includes('..')) {
throw new Error('Path traversal detected');
}
return normalized;
}The first script will help us understand the current implementation in common-path.ts. The second will find any existing path sanitization functions, and the third will show file operations that might need path protection.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential path traversal vulnerabilities
rg -l "\.\./" .
rg -l "\.\.\\\" .
Length of output: 1138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual path handling implementation in common-path.ts
cat frontend/src/config/common-path.ts
# Also check for any path handling/sanitization functions
rg -n "(?i)(sanitize|normalize|validate).*path" .
# Check file system operations that might be vulnerable
rg -n "(readFile|writeFile|readdir|access|stat)" .
Length of output: 25024
| // Utility Functions for File Operations | ||
| export const writeProjectContent = async ( | ||
| userId: string, | ||
| projectId: string, | ||
| fileName: string, | ||
| content: string | ||
| ): Promise<void> => { | ||
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | ||
| await fsPromises.writeFile(contentPath, content, 'utf8'); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const readProjectContent = async ( | ||
| userId: string, | ||
| projectId: string, | ||
| fileName: string | ||
| ): Promise<string> => { | ||
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | ||
| return fsPromises.readFile(contentPath, 'utf8'); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const deleteProjectContent = async ( | ||
| userId: string, | ||
| projectId: string, | ||
| fileName: string | ||
| ): Promise<void> => { | ||
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | ||
| if (existsSync(contentPath)) { | ||
| await fsPromises.unlink(contentPath); | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and add content validation
The file operations are well-implemented but could benefit from additional safeguards.
Consider adding:
- Content size limits
- Better error handling
- File type validation
export const writeProjectContent = async (
userId: string,
projectId: string,
fileName: string,
content: string
): Promise<void> => {
+ if (content.length > 10_000_000) { // 10MB limit
+ throw new Error('Content exceeds size limit');
+ }
const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName);
- await fsPromises.writeFile(contentPath, content, 'utf8');
+ try {
+ await fsPromises.writeFile(contentPath, content, 'utf8');
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to write content: ${error.message}`);
+ }
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Utility Functions for File Operations | |
| export const writeProjectContent = async ( | |
| userId: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| fileName: string, | |
| content: string | |
| ): Promise<void> => { | |
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | |
| await fsPromises.writeFile(contentPath, content, 'utf8'); | |
| }; | |
| export const readProjectContent = async ( | |
| userId: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| fileName: string | |
| ): Promise<string> => { | |
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | |
| return fsPromises.readFile(contentPath, 'utf8'); | |
| }; | |
| export const deleteProjectContent = async ( | |
| userId: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| fileName: string | |
| ): Promise<void> => { | |
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | |
| if (existsSync(contentPath)) { | |
| await fsPromises.unlink(contentPath); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| // Utility Functions for File Operations | |
| export const writeProjectContent = async ( | |
| userId: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| fileName: string, | |
| content: string | |
| ): Promise<void> => { | |
| if (content.length > 10_000_000) { // 10MB limit | |
| throw new Error('Content exceeds size limit'); | |
| } | |
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | |
| try { | |
| await fsPromises.writeFile(contentPath, content, 'utf8'); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to write content: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| export const readProjectContent = async ( | |
| userId: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| fileName: string | |
| ): Promise<string> => { | |
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | |
| return fsPromises.readFile(contentPath, 'utf8'); | |
| }; | |
| export const deleteProjectContent = async ( | |
| userId: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| fileName: string | |
| ): Promise<void> => { | |
| const contentPath = getProjectContentPath(userId, projectId, fileName); | |
| if (existsSync(contentPath)) { | |
| await fsPromises.unlink(contentPath); | |
| } | |
| }; |
| // ----------- We need path traverse Protection after we decide how we read and store the file !!!!!!!!!!!!! ------------ | ||
| // ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Implement path traversal protection.
The comment indicates a known security vulnerability. Path traversal attacks could allow unauthorized access to files outside the intended directory structure.
Consider implementing:
- Path normalization
- Path validation against allowed directories
- Sanitization of user inputs
Would you like me to help implement a secure path validation utility that can be used across all path-related functions?
| private static readonly ROOT_DIR = path.join( | ||
| os.homedir(), | ||
| `.${CodeFoxPaths.APP_NAME}`, | ||
| import { createHash } from 'crypto'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused import.
The createHash import from 'crypto' is not used anywhere in the file and should be removed.
-import { createHash } from 'crypto';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { createHash } from 'crypto'; |
| export const getDatabaseDir = (): string => | ||
| ensureDir(path.join(getRootDir(), 'data')); | ||
| export const getDatabasePath = (): string => | ||
| path.join(getDatabaseDir(), 'codefox.db'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Make database path configurable.
The database path is hardcoded to 'codefox.db'. Consider making it configurable through environment variables to support different environments and deployment scenarios.
+const DB_NAME = process.env.CODEFOX_DB_NAME || 'codefox.db';
export const getDatabasePath = (): string =>
- path.join(getDatabaseDir(), 'codefox.db');
+ path.join(getDatabaseDir(), DB_NAME);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const getDatabaseDir = (): string => | |
| ensureDir(path.join(getRootDir(), 'data')); | |
| export const getDatabasePath = (): string => | |
| path.join(getDatabaseDir(), 'codefox.db'); | |
| const DB_NAME = process.env.CODEFOX_DB_NAME || 'codefox.db'; | |
| export const getDatabaseDir = (): string => | |
| ensureDir(path.join(getRootDir(), 'data')); | |
| export const getDatabasePath = (): string => | |
| path.join(getDatabaseDir(), DB_NAME); |
| export const getTempDir = (): string => { | ||
| const tempDir = path.join(ROOT_DIR, 'temp'); | ||
| if (!existsSync(tempDir)) { | ||
| mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true }); | ||
| } | ||
| return tempDir; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Maintain consistency with directory creation pattern.
The getTempDir function implements its own directory check and creation logic, deviating from the established pattern of using ensureDir. Consider refactoring to maintain consistency:
-export const getTempDir = (): string => {
- const tempDir = path.join(ROOT_DIR, 'temp');
- if (!existsSync(tempDir)) {
- mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true });
- }
- return tempDir;
-};
+export const getTempDir = (): string =>
+ ensureDir(path.join(getRootDir(), 'temp'));Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor