Feat frontend api refactor #24
Conversation
This commit refactors the project frontend API by adding tests and fixes an issue with the backend project API where the user ID should be a number. Note: Please remove any meta information like issue references, tags, or author names from the commit message.
This commit refactors the frontend chat components to improve code organization and readability. It also fixes a bug in the voice input functionality where the transcript was not being properly cleared when stopping voice input.
This commit refactors the frontend chat components to improve code organization and readability. It also fixes a bug in the voice input functionality where the transcript was not being properly cleared when stopping voice input.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files in both the backend and frontend of the application. Key modifications include updates to ESLint configurations, the introduction of new TypeScript interfaces and enums, enhancements to GraphQL handling with subscriptions, and improvements in user authentication mechanisms. Notably, the backend now supports a publish-subscribe model for chat functionalities, while the frontend has undergone significant refactoring to streamline components and improve state management using hooks. Additionally, several files have been added to manage user authentication and project-related GraphQL queries. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 45
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
frontend/.tmuxinator/build.yml (1)
1-2: Consider using an absolute path for root directory.While
./works, consider using$HOME/path/to/frontendor similar absolute path to ensure the configuration works regardless of where it's launched from..eslintrc.js (1)
22-22: Consider using 'error' severity for no-explicit-any.While adding this rule is a good practice for type safety, consider using 'error' instead of 'warn' to enforce strict typing, especially since this is part of an API refactor where type safety is crucial.
- '@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any': 'warn', + '@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any': 'error',frontend/src/lib/model-helper.ts (1)
6-25: Architecture: Function needs significant refactoring.The current implementation has several architectural issues:
- Mixes synchronous and asynchronous operations
- No error handling for GraphQL or localStorage operations
- Violates Single Responsibility Principle by handling multiple concerns
Consider splitting this into multiple focused functions:
async function fetchModelTags(): Promise<string[]> { const result = await client.query<ModelTags>({ query: MODEL_TAGS_QUERY }); return result.data.tags; } function getStoredModel(): string | null { try { return typeof window !== 'undefined' ? localStorage.getItem('selectedModel') : null; } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to access localStorage:', error); return null; } } export async function getSelectedModel(): Promise<string> { if (typeof window === 'undefined') { return 'default'; } try { const [modelTags, storedModel] = await Promise.all([ fetchModelTags(), getStoredModel() ]); return storedModel && modelTags.includes(storedModel) ? storedModel : modelTags[0]; } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to determine model:', error); return 'gemma:2b'; } }backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts (1)
42-45: Add GraphQL schema documentation and validation.The ModelTags type could benefit from better documentation and validation.
Consider adding descriptions and validation:
@ObjectType('ModelTags') +@ObjectType({ description: 'Available AI model tags for chat completion' }) export class ModelTags { - @Field(() => [String]) + @Field(() => [String], { + description: 'List of available model identifiers', + nullable: false, + }) tags: string[]; }frontend/src/test/projectApi.spec.ts (1)
46-47: Remove unnecessary comment.The comment about removing the expect function declaration can be safely removed as it's not providing any value. The
expectfunction is globally available in Jest's testing environment and doesn't need explicit declaration.- -// Remove the expect function declarationfrontend/src/utils/client.ts (2)
30-44: Enhance authentication security measures.The current implementation has several security considerations:
- Using
localStoragefor token storage is vulnerable to XSS attacks- No validation of token format or expiration before usage
Consider these improvements:
- Use HTTP-only cookies instead of localStorage for token storage
- Add token validation before usage
- Implement token refresh logic
Would you like me to provide a more secure implementation example?
65-73: Remove or document commented code.If the hook-based implementation is intended for future use, please document the reason for keeping it. Otherwise, consider removing it to maintain code cleanliness.
frontend/package.json (1)
61-70: Excellent additions for type safety and testing!The new devDependencies significantly improve the development experience:
- GraphQL codegen tools ensure type safety between frontend and API
- Testing libraries enable proper component testing
Consider setting up:
- A pre-commit hook to run GraphQL codegen
- Minimum test coverage requirements
- Integration of generated types with your IDE for better developer experience
Also applies to: 80-80, 84-84
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-layout.tsx (1)
Line range hint
66-73: Extract cookie operations to a utility function.The cookie operations are duplicated and could be extracted to improve maintainability.
Consider creating a utility function:
const savePanelState = (key: string, value: unknown) => { document.cookie = `react-resizable-panels:${key}=${JSON.stringify(value)}`; }; // Usage in component: onLayout={(sizes: number[]) => savePanelState('layout', sizes)} onCollapse={() => { setIsCollapsed(true); savePanelState('collapsed', true); }}Also applies to: 85-92
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx (2)
39-39: Consider using a more specific state name.The
loadingstate could be renamed toisLoadingModelsormodelsFetchingto better distinguish it from theisLoadingprop and clearly indicate its purpose.- const [loading, setLoading] = React.useState(false); + const [isLoadingModels, setIsLoadingModels] = React.useState(false);
114-143: Consider adding aria-label for loading states.The UI handling of loading states is well implemented. Consider adding aria-label to improve accessibility during loading states.
<Button disabled={isLoading || loading} variant="outline" role="combobox" aria-expanded={open} + aria-label={loading ? "Loading models..." : "Select model"} className="w-[300px] justify-between" >frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsx (3)
Line range hint
32-39: Remove unused onClick prop from SidebarProps interface.The
onClickprop is defined in the interface but not used in the component implementation. Consider removing it to maintain a clean interface.interface SidebarProps { isCollapsed: boolean; messages: Message[]; - onClick?: () => void; isMobile: boolean; chatId: string; setMessages: (messages: Message[]) => void; closeSidebar?: () => void; }
Line range hint
89-102: Add error handling for chat sorting and parsing.The current implementation has several potential issues:
- The sort logic assumes messages[0] and createdAt exist, which could cause runtime errors
- JSON.parse is used without error handling
Consider implementing this safer version:
chatObjects.sort((a, b) => { - const aDate = new Date(a.messages[0].createdAt); - const bDate = new Date(b.messages[0].createdAt); + const aDate = a.messages[0]?.createdAt ? new Date(a.messages[0].createdAt) : new Date(0); + const bDate = b.messages[0]?.createdAt ? new Date(b.messages[0].createdAt) : new Date(0); return bDate.getTime() - aDate.getTime(); });And wrap the JSON.parse in a try-catch:
const chatObjects = chats.map((chat) => { const item = localStorage.getItem(chat); - return item - ? { chatId: chat, messages: JSON.parse(item) } - : { chatId: '', messages: [] }; + if (!item) return { chatId: '', messages: [] }; + try { + return { chatId: chat, messages: JSON.parse(item) }; + } catch (e) { + console.error(`Failed to parse chat ${chat}:`, e); + return { chatId: '', messages: [] }; + } });
Line range hint
183-185: Improve message content display safety and formatting.The current implementation directly displays the first message's content without proper safety checks or formatting:
- Missing null check for empty messages array
- No content length truncation
- No content sanitization
Consider implementing these safety measures:
<span className="text-xs font-normal "> - {messages.length > 0 ? messages[0].content : ''} + {messages.length > 0 && messages[0]?.content + ? messages[0].content.substring(0, 50) + (messages[0].content.length > 50 ? '...' : '') + : 'New Conversation'} </span>frontend/src/components/chat/chat-bottombar.tsx (2)
Line range hint
134-157: Enhance accessibility and user feedback for voice inputThe voice input UI could be improved in several ways:
- Add ARIA labels for screen readers
- Provide visual feedback during voice recognition
- Add tooltips explaining voice input status
Consider these improvements:
<Button className="shrink-0 relative rounded-full bg-blue-500/30 hover:bg-blue-400/30 " variant="ghost" size="icon" type="button" onClick={handleListenClick} disabled={isLoading} + aria-label={isListening ? "Stop voice input" : "Start voice input"} + title={isListening ? "Click to stop voice input" : "Click to start voice input"} > <Mic className="w-5 h-5 " /> <span className="animate-pulse absolute h-[120%] w-[120%] rounded-full bg-blue-500/30" /> + {isListening && ( + <span className="sr-only">Voice recognition is active</span> + )} </Button>🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 74-74: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Line range hint
108-112: Reconsider environment-based feature togglingDirect environment checks in components (
env === 'production') could be replaced with a more maintainable feature flag system.Consider:
- Moving feature flags to a centralized configuration
- Using a feature flag service for dynamic toggling
- Creating a wrapper component for feature-flagged functionality
Would you like help implementing a feature flag system?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 74-74: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx (3)
Line range hint
44-63: Add missing dependency to useEffect.The effect depends on
messages.lengthbut it's not included in the dependency array. This could lead to stale state and unexpected behavior.Apply this fix:
useEffect(() => { // Fetch 4 initial questions if (messages.length === 0) { const questionCount = isMobile ? 2 : 4; setInitialQuestions( INITIAL_QUESTIONS.sort(() => Math.random() - 0.5) .slice(0, questionCount) .map((message) => { return { id: '1', role: 'user', content: message.content, }; }) ); } - }, [isMobile]); + }, [isMobile, messages.length]);
Line range hint
102-143: Consider memoizing random values for consistent rendering.Using
Math.random()directly in renders and animations can cause inconsistent behavior and potential flickering during re-renders. Consider memoizing these values.Here's a suggested improvement:
+ const [randomQuestions, setRandomQuestions] = React.useState<Message[]>([]); + const [animationDelays, setAnimationDelays] = React.useState<number[]>([]); useEffect(() => { if (messages.length === 0) { const questionCount = isMobile ? 2 : 4; + const delays = Array.from({ length: questionCount }, () => Math.random() * 0.25); + setAnimationDelays(delays); - setInitialQuestions( + setRandomQuestions( INITIAL_QUESTIONS.sort(() => Math.random() - 0.5) .slice(0, questionCount) .map((message) => ({ id: '1', role: 'user', content: message.content, })) ); } }, [isMobile, messages.length]); // In the render: - const delay = Math.random() * 0.25; + const delay = animationDelays[index];
Line range hint
219-229: Enhance loading indicator accessibility.The loading indicator's accessibility could be improved by using ARIA live regions to announce loading state changes to screen readers.
Apply these improvements:
- <div className="flex gap-1"> + <div + className="flex gap-1" + role="status" + aria-live="polite" + > + <span className="sr-only">Message is being generated...</span> <span className="size-1.5 rounded-full bg-slate-700 motion-safe:animate-[bounce_1s_ease-in-out_infinite] dark:bg-slate-300"></span> <span className="size-1.5 rounded-full bg-slate-700 motion-safe:animate-[bounce_0.5s_ease-in-out_infinite] dark:bg-slate-300"></span> <span className="size-1.5 rounded-full bg-slate-700 motion-safe:animate-[bounce_1s_ease-in-out_infinite] dark:bg-slate-300"></span> </div>frontend/src/utils/requests.ts (1)
238-239: Ensure error handling is informative for 'removePackageFromProject'The error message in the
catchblock ofremovePackageFromProjectis generic. Providing more context can aid in debugging.Consider updating the error message:
catch (error) { - console.error('Error removing package from project:', error); + console.error(`Error removing package ${packageId} from project ${projectId}:`, error); throw error; }frontend/src/app/HomeContent.tsx (2)
186-186: Translate comment to maintain consistencyThe comment at line 186 is in Chinese:
// 发送订阅请求To maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase, consider translating it to English.
Apply this diff to update the comment:
- // 发送订阅请求 + // Send subscription request
90-95: Provide user feedback when WebSocket is disconnectedIn the
onSubmitfunction, if the WebSocket is not connected, the function returns without notifying the user. This might confuse users when their messages seemingly have no effect.Enhance user experience by informing the user:
if ( !input.trim() || !ws.current || ws.current.readyState !== WebSocket.OPEN ) { + if (!ws.current || ws.current.readyState !== WebSocket.OPEN) { + toast.error('WebSocket is not connected. Please try again later.'); + return; + } return; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
frontend/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (35)
- .eslintrc.js (1 hunks)
- .vscode/config.json (1 hunks)
- .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- backend/src/app.module.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts (3 hunks)
- backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts (2 hunks)
- backend/src/main.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/.eslintrc.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/.tmuxinator/build.yml (1 hunks)
- frontend/README.md (1 hunks)
- frontend/codegen.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (4 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/HomeContent.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/[id]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/api/project/route.ts (0 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/provider.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-bottombar.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/types.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql (5 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/lib/model-helper.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/test/projectApi.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/utils/apolloClient.ts (0 hunks)
- frontend/src/utils/client.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/utils/requests.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- frontend/src/app/api/project/route.ts
- frontend/src/utils/apolloClient.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- .vscode/config.json
- .vscode/settings.json
- frontend/.eslintrc.json
- frontend/README.md
- frontend/codegen.ts
- frontend/src/app/page.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
7-7: null
Images should have alternate text (alt text)(MD045, no-alt-text)
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx
[error] 215-215: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 215-215: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 215-215: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 279-279: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 280-280: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 281-281: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 288-288: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 288-288: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 294-294: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 294-294: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 303-303: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 304-304: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 305-305: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 306-306: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 330-330: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 333-333: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 336-336: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 356-356: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 359-359: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 362-362: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (38)
frontend/.tmuxinator/build.yml (1)
1-11: Verify the required dependencies and scripts.The configuration looks good and provides a clean development setup with parallel processes. However, let's verify the required dependencies are properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies and scripts are properly configured
The verification confirms that all required dependencies and scripts are correctly set up:
- The
devscript is configured asnext dev- The
generate:watchscript is configured asgraphql-codegen --watch- The codegen configuration file exists with proper GraphQL code generation setup
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the required dependencies and scripts exist # Test 1: Check if package.json exists and contains the required scripts echo "Checking package.json for required scripts..." if [ -f "frontend/package.json" ]; then # Check for dev script echo "Checking 'dev' script..." jq '.scripts.dev' frontend/package.json # Check for generate:watch script echo "Checking 'generate:watch' script..." jq '.scripts["generate:watch"]' frontend/package.json else echo "Error: package.json not found in frontend directory" fi # Test 2: Verify codegen configuration exists echo "Checking for codegen configuration..." if [ -f "frontend/codegen.ts" ]; then cat frontend/codegen.ts else echo "Error: codegen.ts not found in frontend directory" fiLength of output: 1313
frontend/src/components/types.ts (1)
13-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionStrengthen ChatRequestOptions with documentation and type constraints.
Consider adding documentation and more specific types. Also, verify if
selectedModelshould be required.+/** + * Options for initiating a chat request + */ export interface ChatRequestOptions { - selectedModel?: string; + /** Model identifier to be used for the chat */ + selectedModel: string; // Made required as it seems essential + /** Array of image URLs to be included in the chat */ images?: string[]; + /** Array of file attachments */ attachments?: Attachment[]; }Let's verify the available models and their usage:
frontend/src/app/provider.tsx (1)
7-16: Verify provider integration in the application layout.Let's ensure this provider is properly integrated and there are no duplicate providers in the application.
✅ Verification successful
Provider integration verified successfully
The RootProvider is properly integrated:
- Correctly imported and used in
layout.tsxas the main wrapper- No duplicate providers found:
ThemeProviderin provider.tsx uses a different instance than the one in theme-provider.tsxToasterin sonner.tsx is just a component, not a providerApolloProvideris only used once in provider.tsx🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for proper integration and potential duplicate providers # Check if RootProvider is properly imported in layout echo "Checking layout integration..." rg -l "RootProvider" "frontend/src/app/layout.tsx" # Check for any duplicate provider usage echo "Checking for duplicate providers..." rg -l "ThemeProvider|ApolloProvider|Toaster" "frontend/src/**/*"Length of output: 353
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's fix the pattern and check for duplicate providers properly echo "Checking for duplicate providers..." rg -l "ThemeProvider|ApolloProvider|Toaster" frontend/src/ # Let's also check the actual implementation in layout.tsx echo "Checking layout.tsx implementation..." rg -A 5 -B 5 "RootProvider" frontend/src/app/layout.tsx # Check if there are any other provider components echo "Checking for other provider components..." ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ Provider = $_'Length of output: 976
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of the other files that mention providers echo "Checking theme-provider.tsx content..." cat frontend/src/providers/theme-provider.tsx echo "Checking sonner.tsx content..." cat frontend/src/components/ui/sonner.tsxLength of output: 1483
frontend/src/lib/model-helper.ts (1)
1-4: LGTM: Import statements are correctly structured.The imports are properly organized and typed.
frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (2)
28-28: Good architectural improvement!Centralizing providers into a single
RootProvidercomponent improves maintainability and reduces complexity in the root layout.
28-28: Verify provider ordering in RootProviderSince this change consolidates multiple providers, please ensure that the provider ordering in
RootProviderfollows best practices (e.g., Apollo Provider should wrap Theme Provider if theme depends on GraphQL data).✅ Verification successful
Provider ordering in RootProvider looks correct
The provider ordering in RootProvider follows best practices with ApolloProvider wrapping ThemeProvider. This is the correct order since it allows the theme components to potentially access GraphQL data if needed. The implementation is clean and properly structured.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of RootProvider to verify provider ordering ast-grep --pattern 'export function RootProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { $$$ }'Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try to find the RootProvider implementation using ripgrep rg -l "RootProvider" --type tsx --type ts # Then let's look at its content rg -A 20 "export.*RootProvider" --type tsx --type tsLength of output: 152
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try to find the RootProvider implementation without file type filters rg -l "RootProvider" # Then examine its content rg -A 20 "export.*RootProvider"Length of output: 660
package.json (1)
28-29: LGTM! Node.js version requirement is appropriate.Setting Node.js >=18 is a good choice as it's an LTS version with modern features and security updates.
frontend/tsconfig.json (2)
13-13: LGTM: Source map configurationEnabling source maps is a good practice that will improve the debugging experience.
19-22: LGTM: GraphQL plugin configurationThe GraphQL plugin integration looks correct and aligns with the frontend API refactor objectives.
Let's verify the schema file existence and structure:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if the schema file exists in a different location or if there are any GraphQL schema files in the repository.
Let me check the content of the schema file since we found it at
frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql.
GraphQL schema file exists and is properly structured
The schema file at
frontend/src/graphql/schema.gqlexists and contains valid GraphQL type definitions, including queries, mutations, and subscriptions. The path in the tsconfig.json plugin configuration correctly points to this schema file.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the GraphQL schema file exists and is valid if [ -f "src/graphql/schema.gql" ]; then echo "Schema file exists" # Basic validation - check if it contains GraphQL type definitions if grep -q "type\|input\|enum\|interface\|union" "src/graphql/schema.gql"; then echo "Schema file contains valid GraphQL definitions" else echo "Warning: Schema file might be empty or invalid" fi else echo "Error: Schema file not found at specified path" fiLength of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any .gql or .graphql files in the repository echo "Searching for GraphQL schema files:" fd -e gql -e graphql # Search for any GraphQL type definitions in any file echo -e "\nSearching for files containing GraphQL type definitions:" rg -l "type\s+\w+\s*\{|input\s+\w+\s*\{|enum\s+\w+\s*\{|interface\s+\w+\s*\{|union\s+\w+\s*"Length of output: 1012
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the schema file echo "Content of frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql:" cat frontend/src/graphql/schema.gqlLength of output: 2404
backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts (3)
24-24: LGTM! Consistent field naming.The renaming of
system_fingerprinttosystemFingerprintfollows proper camelCase convention.
39-39: LGTM! Consistent field naming.The renaming of
finish_reasontofinishReasonfollows proper camelCase convention.
Line range hint
1-47: Great job on improving naming consistency!The changes to adopt camelCase naming throughout the GraphQL types improve code consistency and align with TypeScript/JavaScript conventions. This standardization will make the codebase more maintainable.
backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts (2)
1-8: LGTM! Import statements are properly organized.The new imports support the added ModelTags functionality and are all utilized in the code.
35-39:⚠️ Potential issueSeveral improvements needed for the modelTags query implementation.
- The hardcoded model tags should be moved to a configuration file for better maintainability.
- Error handling should be implemented to handle potential failures.
- The method lacks documentation explaining its purpose and usage.
Consider refactoring to:
+ /** Returns available AI model tags that can be used for chat completion */ @Query(() => ModelTags) async modelTags() { - //TODO: model tags api - return { tags: ['gpt-3', 'gpt-4', 'davinci'] }; + try { + // Import from configuration + const { AVAILABLE_MODELS } = process.env; + const models = AVAILABLE_MODELS?.split(',') || ['gpt-3', 'gpt-4']; + return { tags: models }; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error fetching model tags:', error); + throw new Error('Failed to fetch model tags'); + } }Let's check if there's an existing configuration for model tags:
frontend/src/test/projectApi.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-45: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive coverage!The test suite follows good testing practices:
- Proper setup flow with project creation first
- Logical test order from creation to deletion
- Good use of Jest's assertions
- Comprehensive coverage of CRUD operations
frontend/src/components/chat/chat.tsx (3)
Line range hint
28-83: Implementation looks good!The Chat component is well-structured, with proper prop handling and consistent error propagation to child components. The implementation follows React best practices and maintains good type safety.
3-5: Verify type definitions consistency after import path change.The change from importing types from 'ai/react' to '../types' suggests a move to local type definitions. Let's verify the type definitions are consistent.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the type definitions in ../types match the original definitions # Test 1: Check if the type definitions exist in the new location rg -t typescript "export (type|interface) (Message|ChatRequestOptions)" # Test 2: Check for any remaining references to the old import path rg -t typescript "from ['\"]ai/react['\"]"
19-19: Verify error handling consistency across chat components.The change from
undefined | Errortonull | Errorfor the error prop is a breaking change that affects error handling. While this change makes error states more explicit, we should ensure all components using ChatProps have been updated accordingly.✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
The error prop type change is consistent with its usage across components
The search results show that all relevant components (
HomeContent.tsx,[id]/page.tsx,chat-layout.tsx) are already usingError | nulltype for their error states, which aligns with the ChatProps interface change. No inconsistencies were found in the error handling approach across the chat components.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error prop usage consistency across chat components # Test 1: Find all components using ChatProps rg -t typescript "ChatProps[\s]*[,}]" # Test 2: Check error prop handling in these components ast-grep --pattern 'error: (undefined | Error)'Length of output: 314
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find ChatProps usage and error handling # Find files containing ChatProps rg "ChatProps" # Find error prop type definitions and usage rg "error.*Error" -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 10197
frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql (3)
55-57: LGTM! Well-designed type for model tags.The new
ModelTagstype and query are well-structured:
- Non-nullable array of non-nullable strings (
[String!]!) is appropriate for tags- Query return type is non-nullable, indicating this is required data
Also applies to: 95-95
73-73: Verify backend handling for non-nullable path field.The
pathfield inProjecttype is now non-nullable (String!). This is a breaking change that requires verification:
- Ensure the backend always provides a path value
- Verify no existing projects have null paths in the database
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find backend resolver implementation for Project type # to verify path field handling echo "Searching for Project resolver implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements Resolver$_<Project> { $$$ }'
7-7: Verify client-side query updates for renamed fields.The field renames from snake_case to camelCase follow GraphQL conventions but are breaking changes:
finish_reason→finishReasonsystem_fingerprint→systemFingerprintAlso applies to: 17-17
frontend/package.json (2)
Line range hint
16-60: Verify impact of AI package removals.The removal of AI-related packages (ai, langchain, ollama-ai-provider) suggests a significant change in functionality.
Let's check for any remaining references to these packages:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining imports of removed packages echo "Checking for remaining AI package imports:" rg -l "from 'ai'|from 'langchain'|from 'ollama-ai-provider'" echo "Checking for potential missed cleanup:" rg -l "AI|LangChain|Ollama" "src/"
23-23: Verify the necessity of @nestjs/common in frontend.The addition of @nestjs/common is unusual for a frontend project as it's primarily a backend framework. This might indicate incorrect dependency placement or unconventional usage.
Let's check for NestJS usage in the frontend:
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-layout.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM! Well-organized imports and type separation.The reorganization of imports and moving the Message type to a separate types file improves code organization and maintainability.
Also applies to: 10-11
49-50: LGTM! Clean component signature.The component properly uses the ChatLayoutProps interface, making the contract clear and type-safe.
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx (3)
7-18: LGTM! Clean import organization and type definition.The imports are well-organized and the new
ModelTagsinterface is clearly defined.
81-91: LGTM! Well-structured event handlers.The event handlers are concise and handle their responsibilities well. The localStorage check is a good practice for SSR compatibility.
56-61: Verify GraphQL schema compatibility.Let's verify that the GraphQL query matches the schema definition.
✅ Verification successful
GraphQL schema is compatible with the query
The
modelTagsquery in the component matches the schema definition:
- Schema defines
modelTags: ModelTags!as a query fieldModelTagstype hastags: [String!]!field- The query structure in the component exactly matches this schema
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for modelTags type definition in schema files rg -t graphql "type\s+ModelTags" # Search for modelTags query definition rg -t graphql "modelTags.*ModelTags"Length of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for schema files with common extensions fd "\.(gql|graphql)$" # Search for modelTags in any file that might contain GraphQL schema rg "type\s+ModelTags" # Search for modelTags query definition in any file rg "modelTags.*ModelTags" # Look for any GraphQL schema related files fd "schema" --type fLength of output: 545
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the exact schema definition to verify the structure cat frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql # Also check the type definition to ensure full compatibility cat frontend/src/graphql/type.tsxLength of output: 21452
frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsx (1)
30-30: Verify Message type compatibility with previous implementation.The Message type import has been moved from 'ai/react' to a local definition. Ensure that the local type definition maintains compatibility with any existing code that relied on the previous type definition.
✅ Verification successful
Message type change is compatible with existing usage
The local Message type definition in
./types.tsmatches the usage pattern in sidebar.tsx, containing essential fields (id, role, content) and maintaining the same structure as previously used. The change from 'ai/react' to local types is a safe refactoring that doesn't impact type compatibility, as evidenced by:
- The type is used consistently for array declarations and state management
- The interface includes all necessary fields for chat functionality
- No breaking changes in the type structure are observed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Message type definition and usage # Check if the type file exists and compare type definitions # Test 1: Verify the types file exists fd "types.ts" frontend/src/components # Test 2: Check the Message type definition rg -A 5 "type Message|interface Message" frontend/src/componentsLength of output: 449
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the previous Message type from ai/react package # by checking git history and any remaining usages # Check git history for previous Message type import git log -p frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsx | rg -B2 -A2 "import.*Message.*ai/react" # Find any remaining imports of Message from ai/react rg "import.*Message.*ai/react" # Find all usages of Message type in sidebar.tsx to verify compatibility rg "Message(\[|\]|\{|\}|<|>| )" frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsxLength of output: 1024
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-bottombar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
87-92: Verify state synchronization between voice input and loadingThe effect to stop voice input on loading is good, but consider these edge cases:
- What happens if loading starts while processing transcript?
- Is there a potential flash of incorrect input state?
Let's check for similar patterns in other components:
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 74-74: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx (1)
12-12: LGTM! Good refactoring of type imports.Moving the
Messagetype to a dedicated types file improves code organization and maintainability.frontend/src/utils/requests.ts (2)
1-241: Well-structured GraphQL operations and robust TypeScript typingsThe code introduces GraphQL queries and mutations with appropriate TypeScript typings and error handling. The use of
TypedDocumentNodeenhances type safety when working with GraphQL operations.
53-57: Validate 'projectPackages' type consistencyIn the
UpsertProjectMutationVariables, theprojectPackagesfield is defined asArray<string> | null. Ensure that this type aligns with the expected input on the server side. IfprojectPackagesshould contain objects withidandcontent, the type may need to be updated.Run the following script to check for type consistency:
frontend/src/app/[id]/page.tsx (5)
10-25: Good Addition of TypeScript Interfaces for ClarityDefining the
ChatStreamResponseandAttachmentinterfaces enhances type safety and code clarity when handling chat stream responses and attachments.
33-44: Efficient State Management and InitializationThe use of
useStateanduseRefhooks for managing state and references is appropriate. Initializing states likemessages,input,isLoading,error, andcurrentAssistantMessagehelps in maintaining the component's state effectively.
64-69: Potential Security Risk: Storing Messages in Local StorageStoring chat messages in
localStoragemay expose sensitive user information, aslocalStorageis accessible via JavaScript and can be exploited through XSS attacks.[security]
Consider using more secure storage mechanisms like IndexedDB with proper security measures or storing messages on the server side and fetching them as needed. If client-side storage is necessary, ensure data is encrypted and implement robust XSS protections.
214-256: State Updates May Cause Race ConditionsUsing the state inside an asynchronous callback without proper synchronization may lead to race conditions.
Ensure that
setMessagesuses functional updates to safely update state based on the previous state.Confirm that the state updates are correctly encapsulated.
173-179: Attachments Should Be Validated Before SendingThe code assumes
base64Imagesare correctly formatted and safe to send.Add validation to ensure that each image in
base64Imagesis a valid base64-encoded string and meets size and type requirements.
| export interface Message { | ||
| id: string; | ||
| role: 'user' | 'assistant'; | ||
| content: string; | ||
| createdAt?: string; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the Message interface with documentation and additional type safety.
- Add JSDoc comments to document the interface and its properties
- Consider using a more specific type for
id(e.g., UUID) - Consider adding 'system' to role types if system messages are planned
- Consider using a more specific type for
createdAt(e.g., ISO 8601 string)
+/**
+ * Represents a chat message in the system
+ */
export interface Message {
+ /** Unique identifier for the message */
id: string;
+ /** Role of the message sender */
role: 'user' | 'assistant';
+ /** Content of the message */
content: string;
+ /** ISO 8601 timestamp of when the message was created */
- createdAt?: string;
+ createdAt?: `${number}-${number}-${number}T${number}:${number}:${number}Z`;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export interface Message { | |
| id: string; | |
| role: 'user' | 'assistant'; | |
| content: string; | |
| createdAt?: string; | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Represents a chat message in the system | |
| */ | |
| export interface Message { | |
| /** Unique identifier for the message */ | |
| id: string; | |
| /** Role of the message sender */ | |
| role: 'user' | 'assistant'; | |
| /** Content of the message */ | |
| content: string; | |
| /** ISO 8601 timestamp of when the message was created */ | |
| createdAt?: `${number}-${number}-${number}T${number}:${number}:${number}Z`; | |
| } |
| export interface Attachment { | ||
| contentType: string; | ||
| url: string; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the Attachment interface with stronger typing and additional metadata.
The interface could benefit from more specific types and additional properties commonly needed for attachments.
+/**
+ * Represents a file attachment in the chat
+ */
export interface Attachment {
- contentType: string;
+ /** MIME type of the attachment */
+ contentType: `${string}/${string}`; // e.g., 'image/png'
+ /** URL where the attachment can be accessed */
url: string;
+ /** Original filename of the attachment */
+ filename?: string;
+ /** Size of the attachment in bytes */
+ size?: number;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export interface Attachment { | |
| contentType: string; | |
| url: string; | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Represents a file attachment in the chat | |
| */ | |
| export interface Attachment { | |
| /** MIME type of the attachment */ | |
| contentType: `${string}/${string}`; // e.g., 'image/png' | |
| /** URL where the attachment can be accessed */ | |
| url: string; | |
| /** Original filename of the attachment */ | |
| filename?: string; | |
| /** Size of the attachment in bytes */ | |
| size?: number; | |
| } |
frontend/src/app/provider.tsx
Outdated
| 'use client'; | ||
| import client from '@/utils/client'; | ||
| import { ApolloProvider } from '@apollo/client'; | ||
| import { ThemeProvider } from 'next-themes'; | ||
| import { Toaster } from 'sonner'; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add TypeScript types for imports and verify client utility location.
The imports look good, but there are some TypeScript-related improvements that could be made:
- Consider adding explicit type imports for the Apollo Client
- The client utility import might be better placed in a dedicated 'apollo' or 'graphql' directory instead of generic utils
'use client';
-import client from '@/utils/client';
+import type { ApolloClient, NormalizedCacheObject } from '@apollo/client';
+import client from '@/lib/apollo/client';
import { ApolloProvider } from '@apollo/client';
import { ThemeProvider } from 'next-themes';
import { Toaster } from 'sonner';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| 'use client'; | |
| import client from '@/utils/client'; | |
| import { ApolloProvider } from '@apollo/client'; | |
| import { ThemeProvider } from 'next-themes'; | |
| import { Toaster } from 'sonner'; | |
| 'use client'; | |
| import type { ApolloClient, NormalizedCacheObject } from '@apollo/client'; | |
| import client from '@/lib/apollo/client'; | |
| import { ApolloProvider } from '@apollo/client'; | |
| import { ThemeProvider } from 'next-themes'; | |
| import { Toaster } from 'sonner'; |
frontend/src/app/provider.tsx
Outdated
| export const RootProvider = ({ children }) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <ApolloProvider client={client}> | ||
| <ThemeProvider attribute="class" defaultTheme="dark"> | ||
| {children} | ||
| <Toaster /> | ||
| </ThemeProvider> | ||
| </ApolloProvider> | ||
| ); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add TypeScript types and configure provider options.
The component structure is good, but it needs proper TypeScript typing and could benefit from explicit configuration:
- Add TypeScript interface for the component props
- Consider adding explicit theme configuration
- Configure Toaster with specific options for consistency
+interface RootProviderProps {
+ children: React.ReactNode;
+}
+
-export const RootProvider = ({ children }) => {
+export const RootProvider: React.FC<RootProviderProps> = ({ children }) => {
return (
<ApolloProvider client={client}>
- <ThemeProvider attribute="class" defaultTheme="dark">
+ <ThemeProvider
+ attribute="class"
+ defaultTheme="dark"
+ themes={['light', 'dark']}
+ enableSystem={true}
+ >
{children}
- <Toaster />
+ <Toaster
+ position="top-right"
+ expand={false}
+ richColors
+ closeButton
+ />
</ThemeProvider>
</ApolloProvider>
);
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const RootProvider = ({ children }) => { | |
| return ( | |
| <ApolloProvider client={client}> | |
| <ThemeProvider attribute="class" defaultTheme="dark"> | |
| {children} | |
| <Toaster /> | |
| </ThemeProvider> | |
| </ApolloProvider> | |
| ); | |
| }; | |
| interface RootProviderProps { | |
| children: React.ReactNode; | |
| } | |
| export const RootProvider: React.FC<RootProviderProps> = ({ children }) => { | |
| return ( | |
| <ApolloProvider client={client}> | |
| <ThemeProvider | |
| attribute="class" | |
| defaultTheme="dark" | |
| themes={['light', 'dark']} | |
| enableSystem={true} | |
| > | |
| {children} | |
| <Toaster | |
| position="top-right" | |
| expand={false} | |
| richColors | |
| closeButton | |
| /> | |
| </ThemeProvider> | |
| </ApolloProvider> | |
| ); | |
| }; |
| allowedHeaders: [ | ||
| 'Content-Type', | ||
| 'Accept', | ||
| 'Authorization', | ||
| 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin', | ||
| 'Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary CORS headers from allowedHeaders
The Access-Control-Allow-* headers are response headers that should be handled by the browser, not request headers. They should not be in the allowedHeaders list.
Apply this fix:
allowedHeaders: [
'Content-Type',
'Accept',
'Authorization',
- 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin',
- 'Access-Control-Allow-Credentials',
],📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| allowedHeaders: [ | |
| 'Content-Type', | |
| 'Accept', | |
| 'Authorization', | |
| 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin', | |
| 'Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', | |
| ], | |
| allowedHeaders: [ | |
| 'Content-Type', | |
| 'Accept', | |
| 'Authorization', | |
| ], |
| TParent = {}, | ||
| TContext = {}, | ||
| TArgs = {}, | ||
| > = | ||
| | (( | ||
| ...args: any[] | ||
| ) => SubscriptionObject<TResult, TKey, TParent, TContext, TArgs>) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using '{}' as a type in generic defaults
In the SubscriptionResolver type, {} is used as the default for TParent, TContext, and TArgs. This practice can decrease type safety. Replace {} with unknown or more specific types.
Apply the following diff:
export type SubscriptionResolver<
TResult,
TKey extends string,
- TParent = {},
- TContext = {},
- TArgs = {},
+ TParent = unknown,
+ TContext = unknown,
+ TArgs = unknown,
> =📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| TParent = {}, | |
| TContext = {}, | |
| TArgs = {}, | |
| > = | |
| | (( | |
| ...args: any[] | |
| ) => SubscriptionObject<TResult, TKey, TParent, TContext, TArgs>) | |
| TParent = unknown, | |
| TContext = unknown, | |
| TArgs = unknown, | |
| > = | |
| | (( | |
| ...args: any[] | |
| ) => SubscriptionObject<TResult, TKey, TParent, TContext, TArgs>) |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 279-279: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 280-280: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 281-281: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
| export type IsTypeOfResolverFn<T = {}, TContext = {}> = ( | ||
| obj: T, | ||
| context: TContext, | ||
| info: GraphQLResolveInfo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using '{}' as default types in IsTypeOfResolverFn
In the IsTypeOfResolverFn, {} is used as the default for T and TContext. Replace {} with unknown or specific types to improve type safety.
Apply the following diff:
-export type IsTypeOfResolverFn<T = {}, TContext = {}> = (
+export type IsTypeOfResolverFn<T = unknown, TContext = unknown> = (
obj: T,
context: TContext,
info: GraphQLResolveInfo
) => boolean | Promise<boolean>;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type IsTypeOfResolverFn<T = {}, TContext = {}> = ( | |
| obj: T, | |
| context: TContext, | |
| info: GraphQLResolveInfo | |
| export type IsTypeOfResolverFn<T = unknown, TContext = unknown> = ( | |
| obj: T, | |
| context: TContext, | |
| info: GraphQLResolveInfo |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 294-294: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 294-294: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx
Outdated
| Subscription: {}; | ||
| UpsertProjectInput: UpsertProjectInput; | ||
| User: User; | ||
| }>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using '{}' as default types in QueryResolvers
In the QueryResolvers type, {} is used for ParentType. Replace {} with unknown or a specific type to enhance type safety.
Apply the following diff:
-export type QueryResolvers<
- ContextType = any,
- ParentType extends ResolversParentTypes['Query'] = ResolversParentTypes['Query'],
+export type QueryResolvers<
+ ContextType = any,
+ ParentType extends ResolversParentTypes['Query'] = unknown,
> = {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 362-362: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
backend/interceptor/LoggingInterceptor.ts (2)
11-13: Consider using a more specific logger context name.
While 'GraphQLRequest' works, a more specific name like 'GraphQLInterceptor' or 'GraphQLLoggingInterceptor' would better identify the source of the logs in a larger application.
- private readonly logger = new Logger('GraphQLRequest');
+ private readonly logger = new Logger('GraphQLLoggingInterceptor');1-28: Consider enhancing the interceptor with production-ready features.
To make this interceptor more suitable for production environments, consider implementing:
- Request correlation IDs for distributed tracing
- Integration with APM tools (e.g., New Relic, Datadog)
- Structured logging format (JSON) for better log aggregation
- Rate limiting or sampling for high-traffic environments
These enhancements would improve observability and maintainability in production. Would you like me to provide implementation examples for any of these features?
backend/src/user/user.resolver.ts (2)
Line range hint 39-41: Consider implementing authentication using HTTP headers.
The TODO comment suggests using header authorization, which is indeed a better approach. Currently, the token is being passed as a parameter which is not as secure or standard-compliant.
Consider:
- Using
@UseGuards()decorator with a custom AuthGuard - Implementing JWT authentication using the Authorization header
- Using NestJS's built-in passport integration
Would you like me to provide an example implementation of the header-based authentication?
Security measures need to be implemented for authentication flow
Based on the code analysis:
- The
logoutendpoint is indeed unprotected - there's no@UseGuardsdecorator while other endpoints in the project useProjectGuard - No rate limiting implementation was found in the codebase
- Token invalidation is implemented via
JwtCacheServicewhich handles token storage and removal, but the implementation could be improved:- Tokens are verified but there's no expiration check
- The cache implementation uses SQLite which may not be optimal for token blacklisting at scale
Recommendations:
- Add
@UseGuards(AuthGuard)to the logout endpoint - Implement rate limiting using
@nestjs/throttlerpackage - Consider using Redis or a similar in-memory store for token blacklisting instead of SQLite for better performance and automatic expiration support
- Add token expiration validation in the logout flow
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint 23-41: Review authentication flow security.
The authentication flow could benefit from additional security measures:
- The
logoutmethod is exposed as a public Query without authentication guards - Consider adding rate limiting for login attempts
- Token invalidation strategy during logout should be carefully implemented
Let's check if rate limiting is implemented elsewhere:
Consider:
- Adding
@UseGuards(AuthGuard)to protect the logout endpoint - Implementing rate limiting using
@nestjs/throttler - Using Redis or similar for token blacklisting during logout
Let's verify each security concern separately to provide a comprehensive analysis.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for rate limiting implementation
rg -l "RateLimit|ThrottlerGuard|@Throttle" --type ts
Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for authentication guards on logout and other endpoints
rg -A 2 "@UseGuards|@Public" --type ts
# Check for token invalidation/blacklisting implementation
rg -A 5 "logout|invalidate.*token|blacklist.*token" --type ts
# Look for any security-related configurations
fd "security|auth" -e ts -e js | xargs cat
Length of output: 24530
frontend/src/app/globals.css (3)
13-13: Maintain consistent comment language.
While the color values are well-structured, the comments mix English and Chinese languages. Consider standardizing all comments to English for better maintainability and collaboration.
- --primary: 8 100% 60%; /* #FF5533 */
+ --primary: 8 100% 60%; /* Primary orange-red (#FF5533) */
- --accent: 8 100% 60%; /* 设置强调色也为橙红色 */
+ --accent: 8 100% 60%; /* Accent color matching primary */
- --ring: 8 100% 60%; /* 设置聚焦环也使用主色调 */
+ --ring: 8 100% 60%; /* Focus ring using primary color */Also applies to: 19-19, 25-25
36-49: Dark mode color scheme implementation looks good.
The dark mode adjustments appropriately reduce saturation and brightness while maintaining the theme. The HSL values are well-calibrated for dark mode visibility.
Consider standardizing comments to English:
- /* 深色模式下的橙红色调整 */
+ /* Dark mode color adjustments */
- --primary: 8 90% 55%; /* 稍微调暗和降低饱和度 */
+ --primary: 8 90% 55%; /* Reduced brightness and saturation */
- --accent: 8 90% 55%; /* 深色模式下的强调色 */
+ --accent: 8 90% 55%; /* Dark mode accent color */
- --ring: 8 90% 55%; /* 深色模式下的聚焦环 */
+ --ring: 8 90% 55%; /* Dark mode focus ring */Line range hint 71-99: Scrollbar styling implementation is well-crafted.
The semi-transparent theme colors and smooth transitions create a polished user experience. The implementation properly handles hover states and visibility.
Consider grouping transition properties in a single line for better readability:
- transition:
- width 0.3s,
- height 0.3s,
- visibility 0.3s;
+ transition: width 0.3s, height 0.3s, visibility 0.3s;frontend/tailwind.config.ts (1)
30-39: Consider using HSL format for consistency
While the color scale is well-structured, consider using HSL format for the new primary color shades to maintain consistency with other color definitions in the config (which use HSL format).
Example conversion:
- 50: '#FFF5F2',
+ 50: 'hsl(10, 100%, 98%)',frontend/src/app/login/page.tsx (2)
14-21: Remove unused destructured value.
The isAuthenticated value is destructured from useAuth but never used in the component.
- const { login, isLoading, isAuthenticated, validateToken } = useAuth();
+ const { login, isLoading, validateToken } = useAuth();68-72: Enhance error message accessibility.
The error message container should have proper ARIA attributes for screen readers.
- {error && (
- <div className="mb-4 p-3 text-sm text-red-500 bg-red-50 rounded-lg">
+ {error && (
+ <div
+ role="alert"
+ aria-live="polite"
+ className="mb-4 p-3 text-sm text-red-500 bg-red-50 rounded-lg">
{error}
</div>
)}frontend/src/app/register/page.tsx (1)
60-63: Remove debug console.log statement.
Remove the console.log statement as it appears to be debug code.
const handleEnterChat = () => {
- console.log('enter');
router.push('/');
};frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts (2)
73-95: Ensure consistent error handling in handleLogin.
The error handling in handleLogin could be enhanced by logging the error or providing more user-friendly messages. This will improve debugging and user experience.
Consider updating the catch block:
} catch (error) {
- toast.error(error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Login failed');
+ console.error('Login error:', error);
+ toast.error('An unexpected error occurred during login. Please try again.');
return {
success: false,
error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Login failed',
};
}97-102: Consider making handleLogout asynchronous if necessary.
If future changes require asynchronous operations in handleLogout, it might be beneficial to define it as an async function now for consistency.
Optionally update the function signature:
-const handleLogout = () => {
+const handleLogout = async () => {frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx (2)
2-2: Remove unused import 'gql' from '@apollo/client'
The gql import on line 2 is not used in this file. Removing it will clean up the code and eliminate any unnecessary dependencies.
Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-import { gql } from '@apollo/client';135-143: Standardize field naming to camelCase for consistency
The field project_id in the ProjectPackages type is in snake_case, whereas other fields use camelCase (e.g., userId in the Project type on line 131). To maintain consistent naming conventions across your schema, consider renaming project_id to projectId.
Apply this diff to rename the field:
export type ProjectPackages = {
__typename: 'ProjectPackages';
content: Scalars['String']['output'];
createdAt: Scalars['Date']['output'];
id: Scalars['ID']['output'];
isActive: Scalars['Boolean']['output'];
isDeleted: Scalars['Boolean']['output'];
- project_id: Scalars['ID']['output'];
+ projectId: Scalars['ID']['output'];
updatedAt: Scalars['Date']['output'];
};Ensure to update all references to this field throughout the codebase, including any resolvers or queries that utilize project_id.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
- backend/interceptor/LoggingInterceptor.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/package.json (1 hunks)
- backend/src/app.module.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/src/auth/auth.service.ts (2 hunks)
- backend/src/user/user.resolver.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/globals.css (5 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/login/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/provider.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/register/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/auth.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql (6 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/lib/storage.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/tailwind.config.ts (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- backend/package.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- backend/src/app.module.ts
- frontend/src/app/provider.tsx
- frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx
[error] 206-206: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 206-206: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 206-206: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 243-243: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 243-243: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 243-243: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 247-247: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 247-247: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 253-253: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 253-253: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 257-257: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 257-257: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 257-257: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 257-257: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 282-282: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 285-285: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 288-288: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 308-308: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 311-311: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 314-314: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (16)
frontend/src/lib/storage.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM! Well-structured enum for storage keys.
Using an enum for localStorage keys is a good TypeScript practice as it provides type safety, prevents typos, and makes refactoring easier.
1-3: Consider security implications of storing tokens.
Storing access tokens in localStorage makes them vulnerable to XSS attacks. Consider using sessionStorage instead, as it provides better security by clearing tokens when the browser session ends.
Let's check if there are any security measures in place:
frontend/src/graphql/auth.ts (3)
11-15: Consider rate limiting for token validation.
The token validation endpoint could be susceptible to brute force attempts. Consider implementing rate limiting if not already in place.
Let's check for existing rate limiting:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for rate limiting implementation
# Look for rate limiting configurations
echo "Checking rate limiting implementations..."
rg -A 5 "rateLimit|throttle|@UseGuards"3-9: Verify error handling in useAuth hook.
While the mutation structure is correct, ensure that the useAuth hook properly handles login failures and token storage.
Let's check the error handling implementation:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error handling in useAuth hook
# Check error handling patterns in useAuth
echo "Checking error handling in useAuth..."
rg -A 10 "useAuth.*catch|error.*login"1-22: LGTM! Well-structured GraphQL operations.
The GraphQL operations are well-defined with proper typing and follow consistent naming conventions.
Let's verify the integration points:
✅ Verification successful
GraphQL operations are properly integrated and implemented
The verification results show:
- All GraphQL operations are properly integrated in the
useAuthhook with corresponding implementations - Backend resolvers and services handle all operations (
login,checkToken,registerUser) - Input types are used consistently across frontend and backend
- Comprehensive test coverage exists for auth operations
- Proper error handling and success flows are implemented
Key integration points verified:
- Frontend:
useAuthhook properly uses all three operations with correct input types - Backend: Auth resolver and service implement all required operations
- Tests: Both unit and integration tests cover the authentication flows
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify GraphQL schema definitions and resolver implementations
# Test 1: Check if input types are properly defined in schema
echo "Checking input type definitions..."
rg -A 5 "input (LoginUserInput|CheckTokenInput|RegisterUserInput)"
# Test 2: Check resolver implementations
echo "Checking resolver implementations..."
rg -A 5 "(login|checkToken|registerUser).*\{"
# Test 3: Verify useAuth hook integration
echo "Checking useAuth hook usage..."
rg -A 5 "useAuth.*LOGIN_MUTATION|REGISTER_MUTATION|CHECK_TOKEN_QUERY"
Length of output: 11274
frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (2)
9-10: LGTM: Metadata updates reflect new project identity.
The metadata changes from "Ollama UI" to "Codefox" and updated description accurately reflect the project's new identity as a dev project generator.
4-4: Verify RootProvider implementation and migration.
The consolidation of providers into a single RootProvider component improves code organization. However, we should verify that all previous provider functionality is properly migrated.
Let's verify the RootProvider implementation:
Also applies to: 28-28
✅ Verification successful
RootProvider implementation is correctly migrated and functional
The verification shows that:
RootProviderproperly wraps the application with all necessary providers:ApolloProviderfor GraphQLThemeProviderfor dark/light theme managementToasterfor notifications
- Previous provider functionality is maintained with proper imports from their respective sources:
- Theme provider from 'next-themes'
- Toaster from 'sonner'
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify RootProvider implementation and previous provider functionality
# Check RootProvider implementation
echo "Checking RootProvider implementation..."
rg -A 10 "export.*RootProvider" frontend/src/app/provider.tsx
# Verify if previous providers are properly migrated
echo "Checking for any remaining direct usage of previous providers..."
rg "ThemeProvider|Toaster" frontend/src/
Length of output: 1655
backend/interceptor/LoggingInterceptor.ts (1)
1-9: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and complete.
All necessary dependencies are properly imported for the interceptor implementation.
backend/src/user/user.resolver.ts (1)
47-47: LGTM! Field rename follows TypeScript/JavaScript conventions.
The change from access_token to accessToken aligns with standard camelCase naming conventions in TypeScript/JavaScript.
frontend/tailwind.config.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Modern import syntax adoption
The change from require() to import statement improves type safety and aligns with modern TypeScript practices.
88-88: LGTM! Clean plugin configuration
The plugin configuration correctly uses the imported tailwindAnimate module.
backend/src/auth/auth.service.ts (2)
51-51: LGTM! Consistent with TypeScript naming conventions.
The change from access_token to accessToken in the return type follows standard camelCase naming conventions and maintains consistency across the codebase.
69-72: Verify frontend compatibility with the renamed token property.
The implementation correctly uses the new accessToken property name. However, this change might affect frontend code that expects the access_token property.
Let's verify the frontend compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Frontend code is already using accessToken property name
The frontend codebase is already aligned with the backend changes:
- GraphQL schema in
frontend/src/graphql/schema.gqldefinesaccessToken: String! - Auth-related code in
frontend/src/graphql/auth.tsusesaccessToken - Storage utilities in
frontend/src/lib/storage.tsuseaccessTokenconstant - Authentication hook in
frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.tsconsistently usesaccessToken
No compatibility issues found as the frontend is already using the camelCase accessToken property name throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check frontend code for references to the old token property name
# Search for 'access_token' string in frontend files
echo "Checking frontend files for 'access_token' references..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -g '!build' -g '!*.lock' -g '!*.log' 'access_token' ./frontend/
# Search for API response handling in frontend
echo "Checking frontend API/GraphQL handling..."
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -g '!build' -g '!*.lock' -g '!*.log' 'login.*response' ./frontend/
Length of output: 420
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search strategy
# 1. Check if frontend directory exists and list its structure
echo "Frontend directory structure:"
fd . frontend/ -t d
# 2. Search for authentication-related files
echo -e "\nAuthentication-related files:"
fd -t f "(auth|login)" frontend/
# 3. Search for token-related patterns with broader terms
echo -e "\nToken-related patterns in frontend:"
rg -i "token" frontend/ -g "!{node_modules,dist,build}/**"
# 4. Look for HTTP/API client setup files
echo -e "\nAPI client setup files:"
fd -t f "(api|http|axios|fetch)" frontend/
Length of output: 8028
frontend/src/app/login/page.tsx (1)
1-12: LGTM! Clean imports and well-defined interface.
The imports are appropriate and the LoginFormData interface is well-structured for the form data requirements.
frontend/src/app/register/page.tsx (1)
16-20: Enhance form validation and security measures.
Consider adding:
- Password requirements (minimum length, complexity)
- Email format validation
- Input sanitization
- Rate limiting for registration attempts
frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx (1)
1-438: The type definitions are comprehensive and well-structured
The code provides a robust framework for type-safe interactions with the backend. The explicit type definitions enhance maintainability and clarity across the application.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 206-206: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 206-206: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 206-206: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 243-243: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 243-243: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 243-243: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 247-247: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 247-247: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 253-253: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 253-253: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 257-257: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 257-257: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 257-257: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 257-257: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 282-282: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 285-285: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 288-288: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 308-308: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 311-311: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 314-314: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
| return next.handle(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding request timing and error handling to the response pipeline.
The current implementation doesn't track request completion or handle errors in the response pipeline.
- return next.handle();
+ return next.handle().pipe(
+ tap({
+ error: (error) => {
+ this.logger.error(
+ `Operation failed: ${error.message}`,
+ error.stack
+ );
+ }
+ })
+ );Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| intercept(context: ExecutionContext, next: CallHandler): Observable<any> { | ||
| const ctx = GqlExecutionContext.create(context); | ||
| const { operation, fieldName } = ctx.getInfo(); | ||
| const variables = ctx.getContext().req.body.variables; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for malformed requests.
The context extraction could fail if the request is malformed. Consider adding try-catch blocks to handle potential errors gracefully.
intercept(context: ExecutionContext, next: CallHandler): Observable<any> {
+ try {
const ctx = GqlExecutionContext.create(context);
const { operation, fieldName } = ctx.getInfo();
const variables = ctx.getContext().req.body.variables;
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error(`Failed to extract GraphQL context: ${error.message}`);
+ throw error;
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| this.logger.log( | ||
| `${operation.operation.toUpperCase()} \x1B[33m${fieldName}\x1B[39m${ | ||
| variables ? ` Variables: ${JSON.stringify(variables)}` : '' | ||
| }`, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance logging implementation with security and maintainability improvements.
Several suggestions to improve the logging implementation:
- Sanitize sensitive information in variables before logging
- Consider removing ANSI color codes for better log parsing
- Add request timing information for performance monitoring
Here's an improved implementation:
- this.logger.log(
- `${operation.operation.toUpperCase()} \x1B[33m${fieldName}\x1B[39m${
- variables ? ` Variables: ${JSON.stringify(variables)}` : ''
- }`,
- );
+ const sanitizedVariables = this.sanitizeVariables(variables);
+ const startTime = Date.now();
+
+ this.logger.log({
+ type: operation.operation.toUpperCase(),
+ field: fieldName,
+ variables: sanitizedVariables,
+ timestamp: new Date().toISOString()
+ });
+
+ return next.handle().pipe(
+ tap(() => {
+ const duration = Date.now() - startTime;
+ this.logger.log(`Operation completed in ${duration}ms`);
+ })
+ );
// Add this method to the class
private sanitizeVariables(variables: any): any {
if (!variables) return undefined;
const sensitiveFields = ['password', 'token', 'secret'];
return Object.entries(variables).reduce((acc, [key, value]) => {
acc[key] = sensitiveFields.includes(key.toLowerCase()) ? '[REDACTED]' : value;
return acc;
}, {});
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| destructivel: { | ||
| DEFAULT: 'hsl(var(--destructive))', | ||
| foreground: 'hsl(var(--destructive-foreground))', | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in destructive color key name
The key destructivel appears to be a typographical error and should be destructive.
- destructivel: {
+ destructive: {
DEFAULT: 'hsl(var(--destructive))',
foreground: 'hsl(var(--destructive-foreground))',
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| destructivel: { | |
| DEFAULT: 'hsl(var(--destructive))', | |
| foreground: 'hsl(var(--destructive-foreground))', | |
| }, | |
| destructive: { | |
| DEFAULT: 'hsl(var(--destructive))', | |
| foreground: 'hsl(var(--destructive-foreground))', | |
| }, |
| const accessToken = this.jwtService.sign(payload); | ||
| this.jwtCacheService.storeToken(accessToken); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing token management configuration.
While the current implementation is functional, consider these improvements:
- Make the JWT token expiration time configurable via ConfigService
- Add structured error logging in the validateToken method
Here's a suggested implementation:
const payload = { userId: user.id, username: user.username };
-const accessToken = this.jwtService.sign(payload);
+const accessToken = this.jwtService.sign(payload, {
+ expiresIn: this.configService.get('JWT_EXPIRATION', '1h'),
+});And in the validateToken method:
try {
await this.jwtService.verifyAsync(params.token);
return this.jwtCacheService.isTokenStored(params.token);
} catch (error) {
- console.log(error);
+ Logger.error('Token validation failed', {
+ error: error.message,
+ token: params.token.substring(0, 10) + '...',
+ });
return false;
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| const checkAuth = async () => { | ||
| const result = await validateToken(); | ||
| if (result.success) { | ||
| router.push('/'); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| checkAuth(); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consolidate duplicate authentication effects.
This useEffect appears to duplicate the authentication check from lines 22-28. Consider consolidating these checks into a single effect to avoid unnecessary API calls and potential race conditions.
- useEffect(() => {
- const checkAuth = async () => {
- const result = await validateToken();
- if (result.success) {
- router.push('/');
- }
- };
- checkAuth();
- }, []);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
frontend/src/app/register/page.tsx
Outdated
| const handleCreateAccount = async () => { | ||
| if (formData.name && formData.email && formData.password) { | ||
| setStep('success'); | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| const success = await register({ | ||
| username: formData.name, | ||
| email: formData.email, | ||
| password: formData.password, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (success) { | ||
| setStep('congrats'); | ||
| setTimeout(() => { | ||
| router.push('/'); | ||
| }, 2000); | ||
| } else { | ||
| setStep('form'); | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| setStep('form'); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve form submission flow and error handling.
- Move the
setStep('success')after successful API response to avoid false positives - Add specific error handling and user feedback
- Implement proper loading state management
const handleCreateAccount = async () => {
if (formData.name && formData.email && formData.password) {
- setStep('success');
try {
const success = await register({
username: formData.name,
email: formData.email,
password: formData.password,
});
if (success) {
+ setStep('success');
setStep('congrats');
setTimeout(() => {
router.push('/');
}, 2000);
} else {
setStep('form');
+ // Add user feedback
}
} catch (error) {
setStep('form');
+ // Add specific error handling
}
}
};Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| const { data } = await checkToken({ | ||
| input: { token }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix variable passing in checkToken function call.
When using refetch from useQuery, variables should be passed under the variables key. Currently, the token is being passed incorrectly.
Apply this diff to correct the variable passing:
-const { data } = await checkToken({
- input: { token },
-});
+const { data } = await checkToken({
+ variables: {
+ input: { token },
+ },
+});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { data } = await checkToken({ | |
| input: { token }, | |
| }); | |
| const { data } = await checkToken({ | |
| variables: { | |
| input: { token }, | |
| }, | |
| }); |
frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts
Outdated
| return { | ||
| isAuthenticated, | ||
| isLoading: loginLoading || registerLoading, | ||
| login: handleLogin, | ||
| register: handleRegister, | ||
| logout: handleLogout, | ||
| validateToken, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Expose isLoading for validateToken operation.
Currently, isLoading does not account for the loading state of the validateToken function. Including this state can help manage UI feedback during token validation.
Consider modifying the state management:
const [isValidating, setIsValidating] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => {
validateToken();
}, []);
const validateToken = async () => {
+ setIsValidating(true);
// existing code
+ setIsValidating(false);
};
return {
isAuthenticated,
- isLoading: loginLoading || registerLoading,
+ isLoading: loginLoading || registerLoading || isValidating,
login: handleLogin,
register: handleRegister,
logout: handleLogout,
validateToken,
};Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts
Outdated
| const handleRegister = async (credentials: { | ||
| username: string; | ||
| email: string; | ||
| password: string; | ||
| }) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const { data } = await register({ | ||
| variables: { | ||
| input: credentials, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (data?.registerUser?.username) { | ||
| toast.success('Registration successful'); | ||
| return await handleLogin({ | ||
| username: credentials.username, | ||
| password: credentials.password, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| return { success: false }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| toast.error( | ||
| error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Registration failed' | ||
| ); | ||
| return { | ||
| success: false, | ||
| error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Registration failed', | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential registration errors more gracefully.
In handleRegister, if the registration fails but no error is thrown, the function returns { success: false } without any feedback to the user.
Apply this diff to provide user feedback when registration fails without an exception:
if (data?.registerUser?.username) {
toast.success('Registration successful');
return await handleLogin({
username: credentials.username,
password: credentials.password,
});
}
+toast.error('Registration failed. Please check your details and try again.');
return { success: false };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const handleRegister = async (credentials: { | |
| username: string; | |
| email: string; | |
| password: string; | |
| }) => { | |
| try { | |
| const { data } = await register({ | |
| variables: { | |
| input: credentials, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (data?.registerUser?.username) { | |
| toast.success('Registration successful'); | |
| return await handleLogin({ | |
| username: credentials.username, | |
| password: credentials.password, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| return { success: false }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| toast.error( | |
| error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Registration failed' | |
| ); | |
| return { | |
| success: false, | |
| error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Registration failed', | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| const handleRegister = async (credentials: { | |
| username: string; | |
| email: string; | |
| password: string; | |
| }) => { | |
| try { | |
| const { data } = await register({ | |
| variables: { | |
| input: credentials, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (data?.registerUser?.username) { | |
| toast.success('Registration successful'); | |
| return await handleLogin({ | |
| username: credentials.username, | |
| password: credentials.password, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| toast.error('Registration failed. Please check your details and try again.'); | |
| return { success: false }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| toast.error( | |
| error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Registration failed' | |
| ); | |
| return { | |
| success: false, | |
| error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Registration failed', | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| }; |
This commit modifies the `.gitignore` file to exclude the `database.sqlite` file from version control. This file should not be tracked as it is a local database file and can be generated when needed.
This commit updates the import statement for the GraphQL queries and mutations in the useAuth.ts file to use the new request.ts file instead of the deprecated auth.ts file. This ensures that the code is using the correct GraphQL queries and mutations for authentication.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.gitignore (1)
17-18: Consider consolidating the database patterns.
The specific pattern ./backend/src/database.sqlite is already covered by the recursive pattern */**/database.sqlite. Having both patterns increases maintenance overhead.
*/**/database.sqlite
-./backend/src/database.sqlitefrontend/src/graphql/request.ts (1)
24-30: Consider adding pagination and error handling to GET_MODEL_TAGS.
For better scalability and error handling:
- Add pagination to handle large sets of tags
- Include error handling fields in the response
- Consider adding a more specific type for tags (e.g., enum if the values are predetermined)
export const GET_MODEL_TAGS = gql`
query GetModelTags {
modelTags {
tags
+ pageInfo {
+ hasNextPage
+ endCursor
+ }
+ error {
+ code
+ message
+ }
}
}
`;
export interface ModelTagsData {
modelTags: {
- tags: string[];
+ tags: ModelTag[];
+ pageInfo?: {
+ hasNextPage: boolean;
+ endCursor: string;
+ };
+ error?: {
+ code: string;
+ message: string;
+ };
};
}
+export type ModelTag = 'gpt-3.5-turbo' | 'gpt-4' | 'claude-2' | string;Also applies to: 31-35
backend/src/user/user.service.ts (1)
Line range hint 13-28: Consider optimizing the chat retrieval strategy.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Loading all chats and filtering in memory could be inefficient for users with many chats
- Lazy loading might lead to N+1 query problems
- Missing error handling for invalid userId
Consider this more efficient implementation:
- async getUserChats(userId: string): Promise<User | null> {
+ async getUserChats(userId: string): Promise<User> {
+ try {
const user = await this.userRepository.findOne({
where: { id: userId, isDeleted: false },
- relations: ['chats'], // Load 'chats' relation, even though it's lazy
+ relations: {
+ chats: true
+ },
+ select: {
+ id: true,
+ chats: {
+ id: true,
+ isDeleted: false
+ }
+ }
});
- if (user) {
- // Resolve the lazy-loaded 'chats' relation and filter out soft-deleted chats
- const chats = await user.chats;
- user.chats = chats.filter((chat) => !chat.isDeleted);
+ if (!user) {
+ throw new NotFoundException(`User with ID "${userId}" not found`);
}
return user;
+ } catch (error) {
+ if (error instanceof NotFoundException) {
+ throw error;
+ }
+ throw new InternalServerErrorException('Failed to retrieve user chats');
+ }
}This implementation:
- Filters deleted chats at the database level
- Eagerly loads the filtered chats to avoid N+1 queries
- Adds proper error handling
- Uses more specific types
Don't forget to add these imports:
import { NotFoundException, InternalServerErrorException } from '@nestjs/common';frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts (1)
73-95: Implement additional security measures for login.
Consider adding rate limiting and clearing sensitive data after use.
Recommendations:
- Implement client-side rate limiting for login attempts
- Clear credentials from memory after use
- Consider adding device fingerprinting for suspicious activity detection
Example implementation for clearing credentials:
const handleLogin = async (credentials: LoginUserInput) => {
try {
const result = await login({
variables: {
input: credentials,
},
});
// Clear sensitive data
credentials.password = '';
// Rest of the implementation...
} catch (error) {
// Error handling...
}
};📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- backend/src/app.module.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/src/auth/auth.service.ts (2 hunks)
- backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts (2 hunks)
- backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/src/user/user.service.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/hooks/useModels.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/request.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql (4 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- backend/src/app.module.ts
- backend/src/auth/auth.service.ts
- backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts
- backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts
- frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx
[error] 215-215: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 215-215: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 215-215: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 279-279: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 280-280: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 281-281: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 288-288: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 288-288: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 294-294: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 294-294: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 303-303: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 304-304: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 305-305: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 306-306: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 330-330: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 333-333: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 336-336: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 356-356: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 359-359: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 362-362: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.gitignore (1)
15-15: LGTM! Good addition for recursive model ignoring.
The recursive pattern ensures that models/ directories are ignored at any depth in the project structure.
frontend/src/app/hooks/useModels.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.
The imports follow a good organization pattern, separating local and third-party dependencies.
1-1: Verify GraphQL query implementation.
Let's ensure the GET_MODEL_TAGS query is properly implemented and returns the expected data structure.
✅ Verification successful
GraphQL query implementation is properly structured
The verification confirms that:
- The
GET_MODEL_TAGSquery is correctly defined to fetchmodelTags.tags - The
ModelTagsDatainterface properly types the response withmodelTags.tagsas string array - The implementation aligns with the hook's import and usage expectations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the GraphQL query implementation
# Test: Search for GET_MODEL_TAGS query definition
rg -A 5 "GET_MODEL_TAGS.*=.*gql"
# Test: Search for ModelTagsData type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface ModelTagsData {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 628
frontend/src/graphql/request.ts (1)
1-35: Verify GraphQL operations against schema definitions.
Let's verify that these operations match the schema definitions and that all required fields are included.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual schema and type definitions to verify the operations.
GraphQL operations match schema definitions
After verifying the schema and type definitions:
LOGIN_MUTATIONmatches theloginmutation with correctLoginUserInputtype andLoginResponsereturn typeCHECK_TOKEN_QUERYmatches thecheckTokenquery with correctCheckTokenInputtype and Boolean return typeREGISTER_MUTATIONmatches theregisterUsermutation with correctRegisterUserInputtype andUserreturn typeGET_MODEL_TAGSmatches themodelTagsquery in the schema with correct return type structure- The
ModelTagsDatainterface correctly represents the response type
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for GraphQL schema files and verify operation types
# Look for schema files
echo "Searching for GraphQL schema files..."
fd -e graphql -e gql
# Check for type definitions
echo "Checking for type definitions..."
rg -l "type LoginUserInput|type RegisterUserInput|type CheckTokenInput"
# Verify return types
echo "Checking return type definitions..."
rg -l "type User|type ModelTags"
Length of output: 496
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check schema definitions
echo "=== Schema Definitions ==="
cat frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql
echo -e "\n=== Type Definitions ==="
cat frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx
Length of output: 22423
backend/src/user/user.service.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-11: LGTM! Well-structured class setup with proper dependency injection.
The implementation follows NestJS best practices with proper decorators and type-safe repository injection.
Line range hint 13-28: Verify the chat relationship configuration.
Let's ensure the User model's chat relationship is properly configured and that this change doesn't affect existing queries.
✅ Verification successful
Chat relationship is properly configured and handling is consistent
The verification shows that:
- The User model correctly defines a lazy-loaded OneToMany relationship with Chat (
@OneToMany(() => Chat, (chat) => chat.chat.user, { lazy: true })) - Chat model has the corresponding ManyToOne relationship back to User
- The
isDeletedfiltering ingetUserChatsis consistent with the soft-delete pattern used throughout the codebase - Other chat-related queries in chat.resolver.ts and chat.service.ts handle chats appropriately within their contexts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify User model configuration and related queries
# Check User model's chat relationship definition
echo "Checking User model configuration..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class User {
$$$
@$_($$$)
chats: $_
$$$
}'
# Look for other chat-related queries that might need similar isDeleted handling
echo "Checking other chat-related queries..."
rg -l "userRepository.*findOne.*chat" --type ts
Length of output: 292
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to verify the chat relationship
# 1. Search for User entity definition with more relaxed pattern
echo "Searching for User entity definition..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class User {
$$$
}'
# 2. Look for relationship decorators related to chats
echo "Searching for relationship decorators..."
rg "@(OneToMany|ManyToMany|ManyToOne).*chat" -A 2 --type ts
# 3. Search for chat-related queries with broader pattern
echo "Searching for chat-related queries..."
rg "\.chats.*" -A 2 --type ts
# 4. Look for TypeORM repository queries involving chats
echo "Searching for repository queries..."
rg "Repository.*chat" -i -A 2 --type ts
Length of output: 3176
frontend/src/app/hooks/useModels.ts
Outdated
| export const useModels = () => { | ||
| const { data, loading, error } = useQuery<ModelTagsData>(GET_MODEL_TAGS); | ||
|
|
||
| if (error) { | ||
| toast.error('Failed to load models'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| models: data?.modelTags.tags || [], | ||
| loading, | ||
| error, | ||
| }; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Several improvements needed for robustness and performance.
The hook implementation could benefit from the following enhancements:
- Move error toast to useEffect to prevent showing on every render
- Add type safety for the returned object
- Memoize the returned object to prevent unnecessary re-renders
- Include error details in the toast message
Here's the suggested implementation:
+interface UseModelsResult {
+ models: string[];
+ loading: boolean;
+ error: Error | undefined;
+}
export const useModels = () => {
const { data, loading, error } = useQuery<ModelTagsData>(GET_MODEL_TAGS);
- if (error) {
- toast.error('Failed to load models');
- }
+ React.useEffect(() => {
+ if (error) {
+ toast.error(`Failed to load models: ${error.message}`);
+ }
+ }, [error]);
- return {
- models: data?.modelTags.tags || [],
- loading,
- error,
- };
+ return React.useMemo<UseModelsResult>(
+ () => ({
+ models: data?.modelTags.tags || [],
+ loading,
+ error,
+ }),
+ [data?.modelTags.tags, loading, error]
+ );
};Don't forget to add the React import:
+import * as React from 'react';
import { GET_MODEL_TAGS, ModelTagsData } from '@/graphql/request';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const useModels = () => { | |
| const { data, loading, error } = useQuery<ModelTagsData>(GET_MODEL_TAGS); | |
| if (error) { | |
| toast.error('Failed to load models'); | |
| } | |
| return { | |
| models: data?.modelTags.tags || [], | |
| loading, | |
| error, | |
| }; | |
| }; | |
| import * as React from 'react'; | |
| import { GET_MODEL_TAGS, ModelTagsData } from '@/graphql/request'; | |
| interface UseModelsResult { | |
| models: string[]; | |
| loading: boolean; | |
| error: Error | undefined; | |
| } | |
| export const useModels = () => { | |
| const { data, loading, error } = useQuery<ModelTagsData>(GET_MODEL_TAGS); | |
| React.useEffect(() => { | |
| if (error) { | |
| toast.error(`Failed to load models: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, [error]); | |
| return React.useMemo<UseModelsResult>( | |
| () => ({ | |
| models: data?.modelTags.tags || [], | |
| loading, | |
| error, | |
| }), | |
| [data?.modelTags.tags, loading, error] | |
| ); | |
| }; |
| import { gql } from '@apollo/client'; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding operation-specific types.
To improve type safety and developer experience, consider creating separate types for the variables and responses of each operation.
import { gql } from '@apollo/client';
export interface LoginMutationVariables {
input: LoginUserInput;
}
export interface LoginMutationResponse {
login: {
accessToken: string;
user: User;
};
}
// Add similar types for other operations| export const REGISTER_MUTATION = gql` | ||
| mutation RegisterUser($input: RegisterUserInput!) { | ||
| registerUser(input: $input) { | ||
| username | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| `; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Align REGISTER_MUTATION response with LOGIN_MUTATION.
For consistency and to avoid additional API calls, consider returning the same data shape as the login mutation, including the access token.
export const REGISTER_MUTATION = gql`
mutation RegisterUser($input: RegisterUserInput!) {
registerUser(input: $input) {
- username
+ accessToken
+ user {
+ id
+ username
+ email
+ roles
+ }
}
}
`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const REGISTER_MUTATION = gql` | |
| mutation RegisterUser($input: RegisterUserInput!) { | |
| registerUser(input: $input) { | |
| username | |
| } | |
| } | |
| `; | |
| export const REGISTER_MUTATION = gql` | |
| mutation RegisterUser($input: RegisterUserInput!) { | |
| registerUser(input: $input) { | |
| accessToken | |
| user { | |
| id | |
| username | |
| roles | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| `; |
| export const LOGIN_MUTATION = gql` | ||
| mutation Login($input: LoginUserInput!) { | ||
| login(input: $input) { | ||
| accessToken | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| `; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider expanding LOGIN_MUTATION response fields.
The mutation currently only returns accessToken. Consider including additional user data that might be needed for client-side state management (e.g., userId, email, roles) to avoid additional API calls.
export const LOGIN_MUTATION = gql`
mutation Login($input: LoginUserInput!) {
login(input: $input) {
accessToken
+ user {
+ id
+ username
+ email
+ roles
+ }
}
}
`;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts
Outdated
| import { | ||
| LoginResponse, | ||
| LoginUserInput, | ||
| RegisterUserInput, | ||
| } from '@/graphql/type'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing type safety for GraphQL responses.
The imported types only cover input types. Consider defining and importing response types for better type safety across GraphQL operations.
Add response types:
interface CheckTokenResponse {
checkToken: boolean;
}
interface RegisterResponse {
registerUser: {
username: string;
};
}
frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts
Outdated
| } catch (error) { | ||
| localStorage.removeItem(LocalStore.accessToken); | ||
| setIsAuthenticated(false); | ||
| toast.error('Authentication error, please login again'); | ||
| return { | ||
| success: false, | ||
| error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Authentication error', | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling specificity in validateToken.
The catch block could provide more specific error messages based on different error types (e.g., network errors vs. validation errors).
Consider this improvement:
} catch (error) {
localStorage.removeItem(LocalStore.accessToken);
setIsAuthenticated(false);
- toast.error('Authentication error, please login again');
+ let errorMessage = 'Authentication error, please login again';
+ if (error instanceof Error) {
+ if (error.message.includes('network')) {
+ errorMessage = 'Network error. Please check your connection';
+ } else if (error.message.includes('expired')) {
+ errorMessage = 'Session expired. Please login again';
+ }
+ }
+ toast.error(errorMessage);
return {
success: false,
- error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Authentication error',
+ error: errorMessage,
};
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| } catch (error) { | |
| localStorage.removeItem(LocalStore.accessToken); | |
| setIsAuthenticated(false); | |
| toast.error('Authentication error, please login again'); | |
| return { | |
| success: false, | |
| error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Authentication error', | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| localStorage.removeItem(LocalStore.accessToken); | |
| setIsAuthenticated(false); | |
| let errorMessage = 'Authentication error, please login again'; | |
| if (error instanceof Error) { | |
| if (error.message.includes('network')) { | |
| errorMessage = 'Network error. Please check your connection'; | |
| } else if (error.message.includes('expired')) { | |
| errorMessage = 'Session expired. Please login again'; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| toast.error(errorMessage); | |
| return { | |
| success: false, | |
| error: errorMessage, | |
| }; | |
| } |
| Mutation: ResolverTypeWrapper<{}>; | ||
| Project: ResolverTypeWrapper<Project>; | ||
| ProjectPackages: ResolverTypeWrapper<ProjectPackages>; | ||
| Query: ResolverTypeWrapper<{}>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace '{}' with 'unknown' in 'Query' type
Using {} as a type can reduce type safety because it represents "any non-nullable value". Replace {} with unknown or a more specific type to enhance type safety.
Apply this diff:
-export type Query = ResolverTypeWrapper<{}>;
+export type Query = ResolverTypeWrapper<unknown>;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Query: ResolverTypeWrapper<{}>; | |
| Query: ResolverTypeWrapper<unknown>; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 333-333: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
| Query: ResolverTypeWrapper<{}>; | ||
| RegisterUserInput: RegisterUserInput; | ||
| String: ResolverTypeWrapper<Scalars['String']['output']>; | ||
| Subscription: ResolverTypeWrapper<{}>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace '{}' with 'unknown' in 'Subscription' type
Using {} as a type can reduce type safety because it represents "any non-nullable value". Replace {} with unknown or a more specific type to enhance type safety.
Apply this diff:
-export type Subscription = ResolverTypeWrapper<{}>;
+export type Subscription = ResolverTypeWrapper<unknown>;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Subscription: ResolverTypeWrapper<{}>; | |
| Subscription: ResolverTypeWrapper<unknown>; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 336-336: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
| LoginUserInput: LoginUserInput; | ||
| Menu: ResolverTypeWrapper<Menu>; | ||
| ModelTags: ResolverTypeWrapper<ModelTags>; | ||
| Mutation: ResolverTypeWrapper<{}>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace '{}' with 'unknown' in 'Mutation' type
Using {} as a type can reduce type safety because it represents "any non-nullable value". Replace {} with unknown or a more specific type to enhance type safety.
Apply this diff:
-export type Mutation = ResolverTypeWrapper<{}>;
+export type Mutation = ResolverTypeWrapper<unknown>;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 330-330: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
| accessToken?: Resolver<ResolversTypes['String'], ParentType, ContextType>; | ||
| __isTypeOf?: IsTypeOfResolverFn<ParentType, ContextType>; | ||
| }>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The changes are consistent with the GraphQL schema, but test files need updates
The GraphQL schema correctly uses accessToken in the LoginResponse type, but there are two test files that still use the old access_token format:
backend/src/auth/auth.spec.tsbackend/src/user/__tests__/user.resolver.spec.ts
These test files need to be updated to match the schema definition.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify consistent usage of 'accessToken' across the codebase
The access_token field has been renamed to accessToken. Please verify that all usages of access_token have been updated to accessToken throughout the codebase to maintain consistency.
Run the following script to identify any remaining occurrences of access_token:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find any instances of 'access_token' in the codebase. Expect no matches.
rg 'access_token'
Length of output: 207
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context around these occurrences to understand if they are test files
# and also look for any GraphQL schema definitions that might be relevant
# Check the context of access_token occurrences
echo "=== Checking context of access_token occurrences ==="
rg -B 2 -A 2 'access_token'
# Look for GraphQL schema definitions related to access tokens
echo -e "\n=== Checking GraphQL schema definitions ==="
fd -e graphql -e gql . -x cat {}
Length of output: 4071
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 28
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
frontend/src/graphql/request.ts (1)
11-15: Add explicit return type to CHECK_TOKEN_QUERY.
The query should explicitly specify the return type for better documentation and type safety.
export const CHECK_TOKEN_QUERY = gql`
query CheckToken($input: CheckTokenInput!) {
- checkToken(input: $input)
+ checkToken(input: $input) {
+ isValid: Boolean!
+ }
}
`;frontend/README.md (1)
1-2: Enhance development setup instructions.
The note about tmuxinator should include:
- Installation instructions
- Configuration steps
- Command to start the development environment
-we are using tmuxinator if you want to watch both codegen and dev server
+## Development Setup
+
+We use tmuxinator to manage multiple development processes:
+- GraphQL code generation (watch mode)
+- Development server
+
+### Prerequisites
+1. Install tmuxinator: `gem install tmuxinator`
+2. Copy the tmuxinator configuration: `cp .tmuxinator/build.yml ~/.tmuxinator/`
+
+### Starting Development
+Run `tmuxinator start build` to launch both the code generation and development serverfrontend/src/app/hooks/useModels.ts (1)
3-3: Add type definition for LocalStore.
The LocalStore import lacks type information. Consider defining an enum or const object for storage keys to ensure type safety and maintainability.
export const LocalStore = {
models: 'models',
} as const;📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- frontend/README.md (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/HomeContent.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/[id]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/hooks/useModels.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/request.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/lib/client.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/lib/model-helper.ts (0 hunks)
- frontend/src/lib/storage.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- frontend/src/lib/model-helper.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx
- frontend/src/lib/storage.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx
[error] 284-284: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 284-284: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 284-284: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 348-348: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 349-349: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 350-350: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 357-357: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 357-357: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 363-363: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 363-363: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 372-372: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 373-373: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 374-374: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 375-375: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 400-400: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 404-404: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 408-408: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 430-430: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 434-434: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 437-437: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
frontend/src/graphql/request.ts (2)
3-9: Previous review comments are still applicable.
The suggestions about adding operation-specific types and expanding the LOGIN_MUTATION response fields remain valid. Implementing these changes would improve type safety and reduce unnecessary API calls.
16-22: Previous review comment about REGISTER_MUTATION response alignment is still applicable.
The suggestion to align REGISTER_MUTATION response with LOGIN_MUTATION remains valid. This would provide consistency and avoid additional API calls.
frontend/src/app/hooks/useModels.ts (1)
64-81: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
The previous review comment about error handling improvements is still valid.
The error handling and return logic could be improved as suggested in the previous review.
Additionally, consider these improvements:
- Add explicit return type
- Handle potential race conditions between cache and fresh data
+interface UseModelsResult {
+ models: string[];
+ loading: boolean;
+ error: Error | null;
+}
-export const useModels = () => {
+export const useModels = (): UseModelsResult => {
// ... existing code ...
if (!shouldUpdateCache()) {
return {
models: getCachedModels(),
loading: false,
error: null,
};
}
+ const models = loading ? getCachedModels() : (data?.getAvailableModelTags || getCachedModels());
return {
- models: data?.getAvailableModelTags || getCachedModels(),
+ models,
loading,
error,
};
};frontend/src/app/[id]/page.tsx (4)
4-9: Imports are well-organized and necessary dependencies are included
The import statements correctly include all the necessary dependencies for this component, ensuring that all hooks and types are available.
10-29: TypeScript interfaces enhance type safety
Defining the ChatStreamResponse and Attachment interfaces improves the type safety of the code and makes the data structures clear.
69-85:
Potential multiple WebSocket reconnections
The reconnection logic in ws.current.onerror and ws.current.onclose calls initWebSocket without checking if a new connection is already being established. This may lead to multiple WebSocket instances and unexpected behavior.
Introduce a reconnection flag to prevent multiple simultaneous reconnection attempts:
+ let isReconnecting = false;
const initWebSocket = () => {
+ if (isReconnecting) return;
+ isReconnecting = true;
ws.current = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:8080/graphql');
ws.current.onopen = () => {
console.log('WebSocket connected');
+ isReconnecting = false;
};
ws.current.onerror = (error) => {
console.error('WebSocket error:', error);
toast.error('Connection error. Retrying...');
setTimeout(initWebSocket, 3000);
};
ws.current.onclose = () => {
console.log('WebSocket closed');
setTimeout(initWebSocket, 3000);
};
};This ensures that only one reconnection attempt is in progress at any time.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
134-142:
Subscription ID mismatch in stop function
The stop function sends a message with id: params.id, which might not match the subscription ID used when starting the subscription, potentially causing the stop command to fail.
Store the subscription ID when starting the subscription and use the same ID in the stop function:
+ const subscriptionIdRef = useRef<string | null>(null);
In `onSubmit` function:
- id: Date.now().toString(),
+ const subscriptionId = Date.now().toString();
+ subscriptionIdRef.current = subscriptionId;
+ id: subscriptionId,
In `stop` function:
- id: params.id,
+ id: subscriptionIdRef.current,This ensures that the stop message correctly references the active subscription.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx (1)
284-287: Avoid using {} as a type; replace with unknown or specific types
Using {} as a type implies "any non-nullable value" and can reduce type safety. This issue has been previously addressed in past review comments.
Also applies to: 348-351, 357-360, 363-366, 372-376
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 284-284: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 284-284: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 284-284: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
| export const GET_MODEL_TAGS = gql` | ||
| query GetAvailableModelTags { | ||
| getAvailableModelTags | ||
| } | ||
| `; | ||
|
|
||
| export interface ModelTagsData { | ||
| getAvailableModelTags: string[]; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling fields to GET_MODEL_TAGS query.
While the current implementation is functional, consider adding error handling fields to handle cases where model tags might be unavailable.
export const GET_MODEL_TAGS = gql`
query GetAvailableModelTags {
- getAvailableModelTags
+ getAvailableModelTags {
+ tags: [String!]!
+ error: String
+ }
}
`;
export interface ModelTagsData {
- getAvailableModelTags: string[];
+ getAvailableModelTags: {
+ tags: string[];
+ error?: string;
+ };
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| </div> | ||
| - we are using tmuxinator if you want to watch both codegen and dev server | ||
|
|
||
| struct for now |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix unclear documentation text.
The text "struct for now" appears to be a placeholder or incomplete documentation. Consider removing it or replacing it with a proper description.
| src/ | ||
| ├── app/ | ||
| │ ├── hooks/ # React Hooks | ||
| │ │ ├── useAuth.ts # 认证相关 hook |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maintain consistent language in documentation.
Some comments are in Chinese (e.g., "认证相关 hook") while others are in English. For better international collaboration and maintainability, consider using a single language consistently throughout the documentation.
Apply this change to translate Chinese comments to English:
-│ │ ├── useAuth.ts # 认证相关 hook
+│ │ ├── useAuth.ts # Authentication related hookAlso applies to: 11-14
| - we are using tmuxinator if you want to watch both codegen and dev server | ||
|
|
||
| struct for now | ||
|
|
||
| ```plain | ||
|
|
||
| src/ | ||
| ├── app/ | ||
| │ ├── hooks/ # React Hooks | ||
| │ │ ├── useAuth.ts # 认证相关 hook | ||
| │ │ ├── useChatStore.ts # 聊天状态管理 | ||
| │ │ ├── useLocalStorageData.ts # 本地存储数据管理 | ||
| │ │ ├── useModels.ts # AI模型选择和缓存管理 | ||
| │ │ └── useSpeechRecognition.ts # 语音识别功能 | ||
| │ ├── login/ # 登录页面 | ||
| │ ├── register/ # 注册页面 | ||
| │ └── components/ # 共享组件 | ||
| │ | ||
| ├── graphql/ | ||
| │ ├── request.ts # GraphQL 查询/变更定义 | ||
| │ │ ├── auth.ts # 认证相关查询 | ||
| │ │ ├── chat.ts # 聊天相关查询 | ||
| │ │ └── models.ts # 模型相关查询 | ||
| │ ├── schema.graphql # GraphQL Schema定义 | ||
| │ └── type.tsx # 由 schema 生成的 TypeScript 类型 | ||
| │ | ||
| ├── lib/ | ||
| │ ├── client.ts # Apollo Client 配置 | ||
| │ │ ├── apolloClient.ts # Apollo Client 实例设置 | ||
| │ │ └── errorHandling.ts # 错误处理中间件 | ||
| │ ├── storage.ts # 存储相关枚举和常量 | ||
| │ │ ├── LocalStore.ts # localStorage keys | ||
| │ │ └── SessionStore.ts # sessionStorage keys | ||
| │ └── utils.ts # 通用工具函数 | ||
| │ | ||
| └── test/ | ||
| ├── utils/ # 测试工具函数 | ||
| │ ├── client.ts # 测试用 Apollo Client | ||
| │ └── requests.ts # 测试用请求方法 | ||
| └── __tests__/ # 测试用例 | ||
| └── hooks/ # Hooks 测试 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Restore essential README sections.
Based on the AI summary, several crucial sections have been removed from the README:
- Project introduction and overview
- Features list
- Setup requirements
- Complete deployment instructions
- Environment variable configuration
Consider restoring these sections to maintain comprehensive documentation for new contributors and users.
Would you like me to help generate a template for these missing sections?
| lastUpdate: number; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const CACHE_DURATION = 30 * 60 * 1000; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making cache duration configurable.
The cache duration is hardcoded. Consider moving it to environment variables or configuration to allow easier adjustments across environments.
-const CACHE_DURATION = 30 * 60 * 1000;
+const CACHE_DURATION = Number(process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_MODELS_CACHE_DURATION) || 30 * 60 * 1000;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const CACHE_DURATION = 30 * 60 * 1000; | |
| const CACHE_DURATION = Number(process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_MODELS_CACHE_DURATION) || 30 * 60 * 1000; |
| __isTypeOf?: IsTypeOfResolverFn<ParentType, ContextType>; | ||
| }>; | ||
|
|
||
| export type Resolvers<ContextType = any> = ResolversObject<{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace ContextType = any with a specific type in Resolvers
Specifying a concrete type for ContextType improves type safety across the resolver mappings. Use a specific type or unknown if necessary.
Apply the following diff:
-export type Resolvers<ContextType = any> = ResolversObject<{
+export type Resolvers<ContextType = unknown> = ResolversObject<{📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type Resolvers<ContextType = any> = ResolversObject<{ | |
| export type Resolvers<ContextType = unknown> = ResolversObject<{ |
| export type UserResolvers< | ||
| ContextType = any, | ||
| ParentType extends | ||
| ResolversParentTypes['User'] = ResolversParentTypes['User'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use a specific type instead of any for ContextType in UserResolvers
Using a concrete type for ContextType enhances type safety. If the exact type is unknown, consider using unknown.
Apply the following diff:
export type UserResolvers<
- ContextType = any,
+ ContextType = unknown,
ParentType extends ResolversParentTypes['User'] = ResolversParentTypes['User'],
> = ResolversObject<{📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type UserResolvers< | |
| ContextType = any, | |
| ParentType extends | |
| ResolversParentTypes['User'] = ResolversParentTypes['User'], | |
| export type UserResolvers< | |
| ContextType = unknown, | |
| ParentType extends | |
| ResolversParentTypes['User'] = ResolversParentTypes['User'], |
| export type SubscriptionResolvers< | ||
| ContextType = any, | ||
| ParentType extends | ||
| ResolversParentTypes['Subscription'] = ResolversParentTypes['Subscription'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance type safety by replacing ContextType = any in SubscriptionResolvers
Replacing any with a specific type or unknown improves type safety and helps catch potential errors during development.
Apply the following diff:
export type SubscriptionResolvers<
- ContextType = any,
+ ContextType = unknown,
ParentType extends ResolversParentTypes['Subscription'] = ResolversParentTypes['Subscription'],
> = ResolversObject<{📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type SubscriptionResolvers< | |
| ContextType = any, | |
| ParentType extends | |
| ResolversParentTypes['Subscription'] = ResolversParentTypes['Subscription'], | |
| export type SubscriptionResolvers< | |
| ContextType = unknown, | |
| ParentType extends | |
| ResolversParentTypes['Subscription'] = ResolversParentTypes['Subscription'], |
| export type QueryResolvers< | ||
| ContextType = any, | ||
| ParentType extends | ||
| ResolversParentTypes['Query'] = ResolversParentTypes['Query'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Specify a concrete type for ContextType in QueryResolvers
Using any for ContextType can reduce type safety. Replace any with a more specific type or unknown if the type is not yet determined.
Apply the following diff:
export type QueryResolvers<
- ContextType = any,
+ ContextType = unknown,
ParentType extends ResolversParentTypes['Query'] = ResolversParentTypes['Query'],
> = ResolversObject<{📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type QueryResolvers< | |
| ContextType = any, | |
| ParentType extends | |
| ResolversParentTypes['Query'] = ResolversParentTypes['Query'], | |
| export type QueryResolvers< | |
| ContextType = unknown, | |
| ParentType extends | |
| ResolversParentTypes['Query'] = ResolversParentTypes['Query'], |
| export type MutationResolvers< | ||
| ContextType = any, | ||
| ParentType extends | ||
| ResolversParentTypes['Mutation'] = ResolversParentTypes['Mutation'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace ContextType = any with a specific type to enhance type safety
Using any as a default type reduces type safety and may mask potential issues. Consider specifying a more precise type for ContextType or use unknown if the exact type is not yet defined.
Apply the following diff:
export type MutationResolvers<
- ContextType = any,
+ ContextType = unknown,
ParentType extends ResolversParentTypes['Mutation'] = ResolversParentTypes['Mutation'],
> = ResolversObject<{📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type MutationResolvers< | |
| ContextType = any, | |
| ParentType extends | |
| ResolversParentTypes['Mutation'] = ResolversParentTypes['Mutation'], | |
| export type MutationResolvers< | |
| ContextType = unknown, | |
| ParentType extends | |
| ResolversParentTypes['Mutation'] = ResolversParentTypes['Mutation'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 58
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (26)
backend/src/decorator/jwt-auth.decorator.ts (2)
1-1: Enhance the documentation comment.
The current comment is too basic. Consider adding a comprehensive JSDoc comment that explains the decorator's purpose, usage, and any requirements.
-//function decorator for JWTAuth
+/**
+ * Decorator that applies JWT authentication guard to a route handler or controller.
+ *
+ * @description
+ * This decorator automatically validates JWT tokens in the request's Authorization header.
+ * If the token is invalid or missing, the request will be rejected.
+ *
+ * @example
+ * ```typescript
+ * @JWTAuth()
+ * async getProtectedResource() {
+ * // This endpoint is now protected by JWT authentication
+ * }
+ * ```
+ */5-7: Add explicit return type for better type safety.
The decorator function would benefit from explicit return type annotation for better maintainability and type checking.
-export function JWTAuth() {
+export function JWTAuth(): MethodDecorator & ClassDecorator {
return applyDecorators(UseGuards(JWTAuthGuard));
}frontend/src/app/RootProvider.tsx (2)
9-9: Add TypeScript types for better type safety.
The component lacks proper TypeScript typing for its props.
Consider adding proper TypeScript types:
-export const RootProvider = ({ children }) => {
+export const RootProvider = ({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) => {15-15: Consider adding toast configuration.
The Toaster component could benefit from default configuration options.
- <Toaster />
+ <Toaster
+ position="top-right"
+ expand={false}
+ richColors
+ closeButton
+ />backend/interceptor/LoggingInterceptor.ts (1)
1-33: Consider implementing request tracing.
To improve observability, consider adding request tracing capabilities to track requests across different services.
You could:
- Generate a unique trace ID for each request
- Add correlation IDs if provided in the request headers
- Pass these through the context for consistent logging
Would you like me to provide an example implementation?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: autofix
[warning] 21-21:
'error' is defined but never used
backend/src/chat/chat.module.ts (1)
28-31: Consider extracting PubSub configuration to a separate constant.
While the implementation is correct, consider these architectural improvements:
- Extract the PubSub token to a shared constants file to ensure consistency across the application
- Consider making the PubSub configuration environment-aware for different deployment scenarios
Here's how you could improve this:
// src/common/constants.ts
export const PUB_SUB = 'PUB_SUB';// src/chat/pubsub.provider.ts
import { Provider } from '@nestjs/common';
import { PubSub } from 'graphql-subscriptions';
import { PUB_SUB } from '../common/constants';
export const PubSubProvider: Provider = {
provide: PUB_SUB,
useFactory: () => {
// This factory pattern allows for future configuration based on environment
return new PubSub();
},
};Then in your module:
- {
- provide: 'PUB_SUB',
- useValue: new PubSub(),
- },
+ PubSubProvider,backend/src/guard/jwt-auth.guard.ts (1)
1-13: Consider adjusting the file location to match the import comment.
The file comment suggests the path should be guards/jwt-auth.guard.ts, but the actual file is in backend/src/guard/jwt-auth.guard.ts. Consider moving the file to maintain consistency with the comment, or update the comment to reflect the actual path.
The class declaration and dependency injection are well-implemented following NestJS best practices.
backend/src/decorator/get-auth-token.decorator.ts (4)
Line range hint 1-7: JwtService should be injected via dependency injection
The current implementation creates a new JwtService instance on every request. This bypasses NestJS's dependency injection system and could lead to inconsistent JWT configurations.
Consider refactoring to use constructor injection in a custom decorator factory:
import { Inject } from '@nestjs/common';
export const GetUserIdFromToken = createParamDecorator(
async (data: unknown, context: ExecutionContext) => {
const jwtService = Inject(JwtService);
// ... rest of the code
},
);Line range hint 9-20: Standardize error handling between decorators
The GetAuthToken decorator silently returns null for invalid/missing tokens while GetUserIdFromToken throws exceptions. This inconsistency could lead to unexpected behavior and harder debugging.
Consider aligning the error handling approach:
export const GetAuthToken = createParamDecorator(
(data: unknown, context: ExecutionContext) => {
const gqlContext = GqlExecutionContext.create(context);
const request = gqlContext.getContext().req;
const authHeader = request.headers.authorization;
- if (authHeader && authHeader.split(' ')[0] === 'Bearer') {
- return authHeader.split(' ')[1];
- }
- return null;
+ if (!authHeader || !authHeader.startsWith('Bearer ')) {
+ throw new UnauthorizedException('Authorization token is missing or invalid');
+ }
+ return authHeader.split(' ')[1];
},
);Line range hint 1-45: Consider implementing a centralized authentication service
The current implementation spreads authentication logic across decorators, which could lead to inconsistent authentication behavior and makes it harder to maintain security policies.
Consider:
- Creating an
AuthServiceto centralize token handling, verification, and user extraction - Implementing a custom
AuthGuardthat uses this service - Using metadata decorators to specify authentication requirements
- Adding an auth module configuration for JWT settings
Example architecture:
@Injectable()
class AuthService {
constructor(
private jwtService: JwtService,
private configService: ConfigService,
) {}
async validateToken(token: string): Promise<UserPayload> {
// Centralized token validation
}
}
@Injectable()
class GqlAuthGuard extends AuthGuard {
constructor(private authService: AuthService) {}
async canActivate(context: ExecutionContext) {
// Centralized guard logic
}
}
// Usage in resolvers
@Resolver()
class ChatResolver {
@Query()
@UseGuards(GqlAuthGuard)
async getChats(@CurrentUser() user: UserPayload) {
// Resolver logic
}
}Security: Use JWT verification from centralized auth module instead of local decoding
The codebase has proper JWT verification implemented in the auth module and guards, with correct secret configuration and expiration checks. However, the GetUserIdFromToken decorator is using unsafe decode() instead of the secure implementation.
- Replace the local JWT decoding in
backend/src/decorator/get-auth-token.decorator.tswith the properly configuredJwtServicefrom the auth module:
- const jwtService = new JwtService({});
- const decodedToken: any = jwtService.decode(token);
+ @Inject(JwtService)
+ private readonly jwtService: JwtService;
+ try {
+ const decodedToken = this.jwtService.verify(token);
+ if (!decodedToken.userId) {
+ throw new UnauthorizedException('Invalid token payload');
+ }
+ return decodedToken.userId;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new UnauthorizedException('Invalid or expired token');
+ }🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint 22-45: Critical: Implement proper JWT verification
The current implementation only decodes the JWT without verifying its signature or expiration, which poses a significant security risk. An attacker could forge tokens with arbitrary user IDs.
Implement proper JWT verification:
export const GetUserIdFromToken = createParamDecorator(
(data: unknown, context: ExecutionContext) => {
const ctx = GqlExecutionContext.create(context);
const request = ctx.getContext().req;
const authHeader = request.headers.authorization;
if (!authHeader || !authHeader.startsWith('Bearer ')) {
throw new UnauthorizedException('Authorization token is missing or invalid');
}
const token = authHeader.split(' ')[1];
const jwtService = new JwtService({
+ secret: process.env.JWT_SECRET_KEY,
});
- const decodedToken: any = jwtService.decode(token);
+ try {
+ const decodedToken = jwtService.verify(token);
+ if (!decodedToken.userId) {
+ throw new UnauthorizedException('Invalid token payload');
+ }
+ return decodedToken.userId;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new UnauthorizedException('Invalid or expired token');
+ }
- if (!decodedToken || !decodedToken.userId) {
- throw new UnauthorizedException('Invalid token');
- }
- return decodedToken.userId;
},
);Additionally:
- Move JWT configuration to a centralized config service
- Consider adding token blacklisting for logged-out users
- Add rate limiting to prevent brute force attacks
Let's check if JWT verification is properly implemented elsewhere:
Let me check the JWT verification implementation in the found files to make a complete assessment.
Let me check the JWT configuration in the auth module to ensure proper secret configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for JWT verification in the codebase
rg -l "verify.*token" --type ts
# Check for potential JWT decode usage without verification
ast-grep --pattern 'jwtService.decode($$$)'
Length of output: 354
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check JWT verification implementation in auth service
rg -A 10 "verify.*token" backend/src/auth/auth.service.ts
# Check JWT verification in guards
rg -A 10 "verify.*token" backend/src/guard/jwt-auth.guard.ts
rg -A 10 "verify.*token" backend/src/guard/project.guard.ts
rg -A 10 "verify.*token" backend/src/guard/chat.guard.ts
# Check JWT configuration
rg "JwtModule.register" --type ts
Length of output: 3556
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check JWT configuration in auth module
rg -A 10 "JwtModule.registerAsync" backend/src/auth/auth.module.ts
# Check if JWT secret is properly configured
rg "JWT_SECRET" --type ts
Length of output: 553
backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts (1)
56-66: Consider adding field descriptions for better API documentation.
While the implementation is correct, adding @Field descriptions would improve the GraphQL API documentation and make it more self-documenting.
Example improvement:
@ObjectType('ChatCompletionChoiceType')
class ChatCompletionChoice {
- @Field()
+ @Field({ description: 'Index of the choice in the array of choices' })
index: number;
- @Field(() => ChatCompletionDelta)
+ @Field(() => ChatCompletionDelta, {
+ description: 'The delta containing content changes in this chunk'
+ })
delta: ChatCompletionDelta;
- @Field({ nullable: true })
+ @Field({
+ nullable: true,
+ description: 'Reason why the chat completion finished, if applicable'
+ })
finishReason: string | null;
}frontend/src/graphql/request.ts (1)
85-99: Consider pagination for chat messages.
The getUserChats query includes nested messages which could lead to performance issues with large chat histories.
Consider implementing pagination for messages:
export const GET_USER_CHATS = gql`
query GetUserChats {
getUserChats {
id
title
createdAt
- messages {
+ messages(first: Int, after: String) {
+ edges {
+ cursor
+ node {
id
content
role
createdAt
+ }
+ }
+ pageInfo {
+ hasNextPage
+ endCursor
+ }
}
}
}
`;frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx (1)
70-78: Enhance loading states and accessibility.
Consider the following improvements:
- Extract repeated loading text to a constant
- Add aria-busy attribute during loading
- Add aria-label to provide more context about the model selection
+const LOADING_TEXT = 'Loading models...';
+const NO_MODELS_TEXT = 'No models available';
<Button
disabled={modelsLoading}
variant="outline"
role="combobox"
aria-expanded={open}
+ aria-busy={modelsLoading}
+ aria-label="Select AI model"
className="w-[300px] justify-between"
>
- {modelsLoading ? 'Loading models...' : currentModel || 'Loading models...'}
+ {modelsLoading ? LOADING_TEXT : currentModel || LOADING_TEXT}
<CaretSortIcon className="ml-2 h-4 w-4 shrink-0 opacity-50" />
</Button>
// ...
{modelsLoading ? (
<Button variant="ghost" disabled className="w-full">
- Loading models...
+ {LOADING_TEXT}
</Button>
) : models.length > 0 ? (
// ...
) : (
<Button variant="ghost" disabled className="w-full">
- No models available
+ {NO_MODELS_TEXT}
</Button>
)}Also applies to: 83-87, 99-101
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-layout.tsx (1)
Line range hint 94-114: Consider using React Context to avoid prop drilling.
The Chat component receives many props that are passed through multiple levels. Consider using React Context to manage chat-related state and handlers, which would simplify the component tree and make it easier to maintain.
// Example ChatContext
const ChatContext = React.createContext<ChatContextType | undefined>(undefined);
function ChatProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
const chatState = useChatState(); // Use the custom hook suggested earlier
return <ChatContext.Provider value={chatState}>{children}</ChatContext.Provider>;
}
// Updated Chat component
function Chat({ chatId, isMobile }: { chatId: string; isMobile: boolean }) {
const { state, handlers, refs } = useContext(ChatContext);
// ... rest of the component
}frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts (1)
40-45: Document the skip pattern for CHECK_TOKEN_QUERY.
The skip: true pattern is used here to prevent automatic query execution, allowing manual control through refetch. Consider adding a comment to explain this pattern for future maintainers.
const { refetch: checkToken } = useQuery<{ checkToken: boolean }>(
CHECK_TOKEN_QUERY,
{
+ // Skip automatic execution, query will be triggered manually via refetch
skip: true,
}backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts (3)
1-32: LGTM! Consider making the logger name more specific.
The import organization and dependency injection setup look good. The switch to JWT authentication is a positive change for standardization.
Consider making the logger name more specific to better identify the source of logs:
- private readonly logger = new Logger('ChatResolver');
+ private readonly logger = new Logger(ChatResolver.name);Line range hint 88-103: Improve error handling and remove implementation comment.
The implementation comment suggests potential technical debt, and the error handling could be more specific.
Consider these improvements:
@Query(() => [String], { nullable: true })
async getAvailableModelTags(
@GetUserIdFromToken() userId: string,
): Promise<string[]> {
try {
const response = await this.chatProxyService.fetchModelTags();
- return response.models.data.map((model) => model.id); // Adjust based on model structure
+ return response.models.data.map((model) => model.id);
} catch (error) {
- throw new Error('Failed to fetch model tags');
+ this.logger.error('Failed to fetch model tags:', {
+ error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : error,
+ userId
+ });
+ throw new Error('Unable to retrieve available models. Please try again later.');
}
}Line range hint 107-128: Address the TODO comment for message updates.
The comment indicates missing functionality for message updates.
Would you like me to help create a new resolver for message updates? This could include functionality for:
- Editing message content
- Updating message metadata
- Managing message status
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-bottombar.tsx (1)
117-151: Enhance accessibility and animation support.
While the button states are well-handled, consider these improvements:
- Add aria labels for voice and send buttons
- Add reduced motion support for the pulse animation
- Extract common button properties to reduce duplication
Apply these changes:
<Button
className="shrink-0 relative rounded-full bg-blue-500/30 hover:bg-blue-400/30 "
variant="ghost"
size="icon"
type="button"
+ aria-label={isListening ? "Stop voice input" : "Start voice input"}
onClick={handleListenClick}
>
<Mic className="w-5 h-5 " />
- <span className="animate-pulse absolute h-[120%] w-[120%] rounded-full bg-blue-500/30" />
+ <span className="absolute h-[120%] w-[120%] rounded-full bg-blue-500/30 motion-safe:animate-pulse" />
</Button>
<Button
className="shrink-0 rounded-full"
variant="ghost"
size="icon"
type="submit"
+ aria-label="Send message"
disabled={!input.trim() || isListening}
>
<SendHorizonal className="w-5 h-5 " />
</Button>frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx (1)
Line range hint 198-218: Improve loading state accessibility.
The loading indicator should be more accessible with proper ARIA attributes.
-<div className="flex gap-1">
+<div
+ className="flex gap-1"
+ role="status"
+ aria-label="Loading response"
+>
<span className="size-1.5 rounded-full bg-slate-700 motion-safe:animate-[bounce_1s_ease-in-out_infinite] dark:bg-slate-300"></span>
<span className="size-1.5 rounded-full bg-slate-700 motion-safe:animate-[bounce_0.5s_ease-in-out_infinite] dark:bg-slate-300"></span>
<span className="size-1.5 rounded-full bg-slate-700 motion-safe:animate-[bounce_1s_ease-in-out_infinite] dark:bg-slate-300"></span>
+ <span className="sr-only">Loading...</span>
</div>frontend/src/app/HomeContent.tsx (2)
131-136: Enhance error handling in subscription
The current error handling could provide more context to users. Consider extracting the error message from the GraphQL error object:
onError: (error) => {
- toast.error('Connection error. Please try again.');
+ const errorMessage = error.message || 'Connection error. Please try again.';
+ console.error('Subscription error details:', error);
+ toast.error(errorMessage);
setStreamStatus(StreamStatus.IDLE);
finishChatResponse();
}254-258: Enhance subscription error monitoring
The current error monitoring could be more comprehensive:
useEffect(() => {
if (subError) {
- console.error('Subscription error:', subError);
+ console.error('Subscription error:', {
+ message: subError.message,
+ networkError: subError.networkError,
+ graphQLErrors: subError.graphQLErrors,
+ });
+ // Consider reporting to error monitoring service
+ // errorReportingService.captureError(subError);
}
}, [subError]);frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx (1)
205-205: Use camelCase for field names
The field project_id uses snake_case naming convention. Consider using camelCase to maintain consistency with TypeScript/JavaScript conventions.
Apply this diff:
- project_id: Scalars['ID']['output'];
+ projectId: Scalars['ID']['output'];frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsx (2)
135-137: Handle the scenario when no chats are available
When sortedChats is empty, no message is displayed to the user. Consider adding a message to indicate that there are no chats.
Apply this diff to display a message when there are no chats:
{sortedChats.length > 0 ? (
<div>
{sortedChats.map((chat) => {
// existing code
})}
</div>
) : (
+ <p className="text-muted-foreground px-4">No chats available.</p>
)}165-165: Avoid unnecessary preventDefault in button click handler
The onClick handler calls e.preventDefault(), but since the button is not inside a form or anchor tag, this may not be necessary.
Consider removing the preventDefault call:
<Button
variant="ghost"
className="flex justify-end items-center"
- onClick={(e) => e.preventDefault()}
>📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (34)
- backend/interceptor/LoggingInterceptor.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/package.json (1 hunks)
- backend/src/app.module.ts (2 hunks)
- backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts (3 hunks)
- backend/src/chat/chat.module.ts (2 hunks)
- backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts (3 hunks)
- backend/src/chat/chat.service.ts (5 hunks)
- backend/src/chat/dto/chat.input.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/src/decorator/get-auth-token.decorator.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/src/decorator/jwt-auth.decorator.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/src/guard/jwt-auth.guard.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/src/project/project.resolver.ts (1 hunks)
- backend/src/user/user.model.ts (0 hunks)
- backend/src/user/user.resolver.ts (2 hunks)
- backend/src/user/user.service.ts (2 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (5 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/AuthProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/HomeContent.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/RootProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/[id]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/hooks/useAuth.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/register/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-bottombar.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-layout.tsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx (4 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/user-settings.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/request.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql (7 hunks)
- frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/lib/client.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- backend/src/user/user.model.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- backend/src/project/project.resolver.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- backend/src/app.module.ts
- backend/src/user/user.resolver.ts
- backend/src/user/user.service.ts
- frontend/src/app/layout.tsx
- frontend/src/app/register/page.tsx
- frontend/src/components/chat/chat.tsx
- frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: autofix
backend/interceptor/LoggingInterceptor.ts
[warning] 21-21:
'error' is defined but never used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx
[error] 19-19: This expression always returns false, because the string is converted and will never match
This call convert the string to lower case
... but this value is not in lower case
Unsafe fix: Use lower case string value.
(lint/correctness/noStringCaseMismatch)
[error] 25-25: This expression always returns false, because the string is converted and will never match
This call convert the string to lower case
... but this value is not in lower case
Unsafe fix: Use lower case string value.
(lint/correctness/noStringCaseMismatch)
frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx
[error] 293-293: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 293-293: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 293-293: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 357-357: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 358-358: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 359-359: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 366-366: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 366-366: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 372-372: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 372-372: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 381-381: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 382-382: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 383-383: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 384-384: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 409-409: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 413-413: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 418-418: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 440-440: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 444-444: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 447-447: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (33)
backend/src/decorator/jwt-auth.decorator.ts (1)
5-7: Verify the JWT guard implementation.
The decorator looks correct, but let's verify that the referenced JWTAuthGuard is properly implemented with the necessary JWT validation logic.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the JWT implementation.
Let me check one more aspect to verify the complete JWT implementation.
JWT guard implementation is properly implemented and secure
The JWT authentication implementation is correctly structured with:
- A properly implemented
JWTAuthGuardthat validates tokens usingJwtService - Secure token extraction from Authorization header with Bearer scheme
- Proper error handling for missing/invalid tokens
- JWT module configuration with secret and expiration
- Integration with NestJS's dependency injection system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the JWT guard implementation
# Test 1: Check if JWTAuthGuard exists and extends AuthGuard
echo "Checking JWTAuthGuard implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export class JWTAuthGuard extends AuthGuard {
$$$
}'
# Test 2: Check for proper JWT validation setup
echo "Checking JWT validation setup..."
rg -l "JWT|JsonWebToken" --type ts
Length of output: 485
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual implementation of JWTAuthGuard
echo "Checking JWTAuthGuard implementation details..."
rg -A 10 "export class JWTAuthGuard" backend/src/guard/jwt-auth.guard.ts
# Check JWT configuration in auth module
echo "Checking JWT configuration in auth module..."
rg "JwtModule" -A 5 backend/src/auth/auth.module.ts
# Check JWT strategy implementation
echo "Looking for JWT strategy..."
fd "jwt.strategy" --type f --exec rg -l "class.*Strategy"
Length of output: 1513
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the rest of the JWTAuthGuard implementation
echo "Checking complete JWTAuthGuard implementation..."
cat backend/src/guard/jwt-auth.guard.ts
# Check auth service for JWT-related methods
echo "Checking AuthService JWT handling..."
rg -A 5 "class AuthService" backend/src/auth/auth.service.ts
Length of output: 1455
backend/src/chat/dto/chat.input.ts (1)
25-27: Document the breaking change and expected model values.
The addition of a required model field is a breaking change that will affect existing clients. Additionally, there's no documentation about what values are acceptable for this field.
Let's check if this breaking change is documented:
Consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to document expected model values:
/**
* @field model - Specifies the AI model to use for chat responses
* @example "gpt-3.5-turbo", "gpt-4"
*/
@Field()
model: string;- Using an enum instead of string to restrict possible values:
@Field(() => ChatModel)
model: ChatModel;frontend/src/app/RootProvider.tsx (2)
1-8: LGTM: Imports and client directive are correctly structured.
The 'use client' directive is appropriately placed at the top, and all necessary providers are imported.
11-18: Provider nesting order looks good.
The provider hierarchy is well-structured:
- ApolloProvider for GraphQL operations
- AuthProvider for authentication state
- ThemeProvider for theming
Let's verify the client configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the Apollo client configuration to ensure it's properly set up.
Let me check one more thing to verify the complete setup of links and middleware:
Apollo client configuration is properly set up with correct provider nesting
The verification confirms that:
- Apollo client is correctly configured with proper authentication middleware
- Auth token handling is implemented in the middleware
- Request logging and error handling are in place
- The provider nesting order in RootProvider.tsx aligns with the client configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the Apollo Client configuration includes proper authentication handling
rg -l "new ApolloClient" | xargs rg -A 10 "authLink|setContext"
Length of output: 296
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full Apollo client configuration
rg -l "new ApolloClient" | xargs rg -B 10 -A 10 "new ApolloClient"
Length of output: 515
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete setup of Apollo links and middleware
rg -B 20 -A 5 "const authMiddleware = setContext|const authMiddleware = new ApolloLink"
Length of output: 1552
backend/interceptor/LoggingInterceptor.ts (3)
1-13: LGTM! Clean and well-structured class declaration.
The imports are appropriate and the class is properly decorated with @Injectable().
25-29: Enhance logging implementation for security and observability.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Sensitive data in variables could be exposed in logs
- ANSI colors can interfere with log parsing
- Structured logging would be more machine-readable
The previous review comment suggesting sanitization and structured logging format is still valid and applicable.
31-32: Add request timing and error handling to the response pipeline.
The current implementation doesn't track request completion time or handle errors in the response pipeline.
The previous review comment suggesting response pipeline improvements with timing and error handling is still valid and applicable.
backend/src/chat/chat.module.ts (1)
14-14: LGTM: Clean import of PubSub.
The import statement follows NestJS best practices.
backend/src/guard/jwt-auth.guard.ts (1)
15-32: Verify the impact on existing chat functionality.
The AI summary mentions this guard replaces ChatGuard in ChatResolver. Let's verify the integration.
✅ Verification successful
The new JWTAuthGuard is not a direct replacement for ChatGuard - both serve different purposes
The verification reveals that ChatGuard and JWTAuthGuard have distinct responsibilities:
- ChatGuard performs chat-specific authorization (verifying user's access to specific chats)
- JWTAuthGuard only handles token validation
Current implementation correctly uses both:
@JWTAuth()for basic authenticationChatGuardfor chat-specific authorization where needed
The changes to jwt-auth.guard.ts are safe and don't impact existing chat functionality as they serve complementary purposes rather than replacing each other.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the usage of JWTAuthGuard and ChatGuard in resolvers
echo "Checking for ChatGuard usage that might need updating:"
rg "ChatGuard" -l
echo -e "\nChecking for JWTAuth decorator usage:"
rg "@JWTAuth" -l
echo -e "\nChecking resolver files for guard usage:"
rg "UseGuards.*JWTAuthGuard" -l
Length of output: 551
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation and usage in the relevant files
echo "=== ChatGuard implementation ==="
cat backend/src/guard/chat.guard.ts
echo -e "\n=== JWTAuth decorator implementation ==="
cat backend/src/decorator/jwt-auth.decorator.ts
echo -e "\n=== Chat resolver implementation ==="
cat backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts
echo -e "\n=== Chat module implementation ==="
cat backend/src/chat/chat.module.ts
Length of output: 10723
frontend/src/app/AuthProvider.tsx (1)
1-10: LGTM! Clean imports and interface definition.
The imports are well-organized and the TypeScript interface is properly defined.
backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts (1)
21-28: LGTM! Well-structured enum implementation.
The StreamStatus enum is well-defined with clear states and properly registered for GraphQL usage.
backend/package.json (1)
43-44: LGTM: GraphQL subscription dependencies added correctly.
The addition of graphql-subscriptions and graphql-ws is appropriate for implementing real-time features with GraphQL subscriptions.
frontend/package.json (2)
63-72: LGTM! Comprehensive testing and development tooling.
The added development dependencies provide a solid foundation for:
- GraphQL type generation and IDE support
- React component testing
- Development workflow improvements
Also applies to: 82-82, 86-86
13-14: Verify GraphQL code generation configuration.
The new GraphQL code generation scripts require proper configuration. Ensure that codegen.ts or codegen.yml exists with the correct schema path and output settings.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the configuration content to ensure it's properly set up.
Let me verify if the schema file exists at the specified path.
GraphQL code generation is properly configured
The setup is complete with:
- Valid
codegen.tsconfiguration file - Proper schema file at
src/graphql/schema.gql - Correct plugins and settings for TypeScript and React Apollo
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for GraphQL codegen config
if [ -f "frontend/codegen.ts" ] || [ -f "frontend/codegen.yml" ]; then
echo "GraphQL codegen config found"
else
echo "Warning: Missing GraphQL codegen configuration"
fi
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of codegen.ts
cat frontend/codegen.ts
Length of output: 774
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the GraphQL schema file exists
if [ -f "frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql" ]; then
echo "Schema file exists"
head -n 5 frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql
else
echo "Warning: Schema file not found at specified path"
fi
Length of output: 318
frontend/src/graphql/request.ts (2)
11-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance CHECK_TOKEN_QUERY response type.
The query returns a boolean but doesn't handle potential error scenarios.
Consider expanding the response to include error information:
export const CHECK_TOKEN_QUERY = gql`
query CheckToken($input: CheckTokenInput!) {
- checkToken(input: $input)
+ checkToken(input: $input) {
+ isValid: Boolean!
+ error: String
+ }
}
`;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
1-139: Verify sensitive data handling.
Several operations handle sensitive data (auth tokens, user information).
Let's verify proper handling of sensitive data:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I have sufficient information about error handling and input validation in the codebase.
Sensitive data handling is properly implemented
The codebase demonstrates robust handling of sensitive data through:
-
Proper error handling that avoids leaking sensitive details:
- Authentication errors use
UnauthorizedExceptionwith generic messages - Login/registration errors are sanitized before reaching the client
- GraphQL errors are filtered through an error link that logs but doesn't expose internals
- Authentication errors use
-
Input validation and sanitization:
- Login/registration DTOs have validation rules (evidenced by validation tests)
- GraphQL inputs are typed and validated before processing
- Token validation occurs at multiple layers (guards, services)
-
Secure error responses:
- Authentication errors return standardized messages
- API errors are logged server-side but sanitized for client responses
- GraphQL error handling prevents exposure of internal details
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential sensitive data exposure in error responses
echo "Checking for error handling in operations that return sensitive data..."
rg -l "login|register|user|email|token" | xargs rg "error|Error|exception|Exception"
# Check for proper input sanitization
echo "Checking for input validation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'input: $input'
Length of output: 30405
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-topbar.tsx (1)
32-32: Verify error handling in useModels hook.
The component relies on the useModels hook for data fetching, but we should ensure proper error handling is implemented in the hook.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling in useModels hook is properly implemented
The hook has comprehensive error handling:
- Uses toast notifications for GraphQL errors
- Gracefully handles cache parsing errors with fallback to empty array
- Returns error state to components for handling
- Implements fallback to cached data when network requests fail
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the useModels hook implementation to verify error handling
echo "Searching for useModels hook implementation..."
rg -t typescript -t javascript "export.*useModels.*=" -A 10
Length of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for useModels hook implementation with proper file extension
echo "Searching for useModels hook implementation..."
rg -t ts -t tsx -t js -t jsx "export.*useModels.*=" -A 10
# Also search for any file containing useModels
echo -e "\nSearching for files containing useModels..."
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "useModels"
Length of output: 904
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of useModels hook
echo "Content of useModels hook implementation:"
cat frontend/src/app/hooks/useModels.ts
Length of output: 1900
frontend/src/components/user-settings.tsx (3)
31-36: LGTM! Well-structured logout handler
The logout handler is properly memoized and correctly handles both navigation and authentication state cleanup.
95-100: LGTM! Well-implemented logout menu item
The logout menu item is properly implemented with appropriate styling and event handling.
105-105: LGTM! Proper memoization
The component is correctly memoized, which can help prevent unnecessary re-renders.
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-layout.tsx (2)
Line range hint 29-46: LGTM! Clean prop handling and state initialization.
The component properly handles default values and uses TypeScript effectively.
48-57: Previous review comment about resize event optimization is still applicable.
backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts (2)
34-44: LGTM! Well-structured subscription setup.
The subscription implementation with proper filtering and resolving functions ensures messages are correctly routed to their respective chat streams.
Line range hint 130-157: LGTM! Well-structured chat mutations.
The chat mutations are properly implemented with appropriate authentication and clear method signatures.
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-bottombar.tsx (1)
66-73: Previous review comment is still applicable.
The voice input methods still need the improvements suggested in the previous review regarding error handling, ESLint comments, and transcript updates.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 72-72: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
frontend/src/components/chat/chat-list.tsx (2)
41-52: LGTM! Well-implemented scroll behavior.
The scroll implementation with setTimeout and proper cleanup is a good approach for smooth scrolling.
39-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a constant instead of state for initial questions.
The initialQuestions state setter is never used, suggesting this could be a constant instead of state.
-const [initialQuestions, setInitialQuestions] = React.useState<Message[]>([]);
+const initialQuestions: Message[] = INITIAL_QUESTIONS;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
frontend/src/app/HomeContent.tsx (1)
1-38: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.
The imports are well-organized, and the type definitions are clear and properly structured. The StreamStatus enum and interfaces provide good type safety for the chat functionality.
frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx (2)
1-29: LGTM! Well-structured utility types
The utility types are well-defined and provide good type safety for the GraphQL schema.
735-741: Verify chat stream subscription implementation
The chat stream subscription is set up correctly in the type system, but ensure that the actual implementation:
- Properly handles backpressure for streaming responses
- Implements cleanup on unsubscribe
- Has error handling for stream failures
Run this script to check the subscription implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Chat stream implementation is properly handled
The implementation in ChatProxyService has all the necessary components for safe stream handling:
- ✓ Backpressure handling through a chunk queue system
- ✓ Proper cleanup with unsubscribe on completion and errors
- ✓ Comprehensive error handling including:
- Stream error handling with logging
- Chunk parsing error handling
- Proper error propagation through iterator's throw method
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find the chat stream subscription implementation
# Look for subscription resolver implementation
echo "=== Searching for chat stream subscription implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "chatStream.*Subscription"
# Look for stream handling patterns
echo -e "\n=== Checking stream handling patterns ==="
rg -A 5 "new AsyncIterator|yield|return cleanup"
Length of output: 905
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the subscription resolver implementation more broadly
echo "=== Searching for subscription resolver implementation ==="
rg -A 15 "Subscription: {"
# Look for chat stream implementation patterns
echo -e "\n=== Searching for chat stream implementation ==="
rg -A 15 "chatStream.*subscribe"
# Look for AsyncIterator or PubSub patterns
echo -e "\n=== Checking PubSub and AsyncIterator patterns ==="
rg -A 10 "PubSub|AsyncIterator"
# Search for any chat stream related files
echo -e "\n=== Looking for chat stream related files ==="
fd -t f chat.*stream
Length of output: 3597
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the chat stream implementation in the resolver
echo "=== Checking chat stream resolver implementation ==="
rg -A 20 "@Subscription.*chatStream" backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts
# Look at the ChatProxyService stream implementation
echo -e "\n=== Examining ChatProxyService stream implementation ==="
rg -A 20 "streamChat.*CustomAsyncIterableIterator" backend/src/chat/chat.service.ts
# Check for error handling patterns
echo -e "\n=== Looking for error handling patterns ==="
rg -A 10 "catch|error|throw" backend/src/chat/chat.service.ts
Length of output: 3218
frontend/src/app/[id]/page.tsx (2)
149-152: Message ID Should Be Unique for Each Message
Using params.id as the message id may cause conflicts if multiple messages share the same chatId.
The previous review comment about ensuring unique message IDs still applies. Please update the message ID generation to prevent potential conflicts.
38-41: Handle Potential Undefined Models in Initial State
When initializing selectedModel, there's a possibility that models[0] is undefined if the models have not been loaded yet.
Refer to the previous review comment regarding handling the initial state when models are not yet loaded.
backend/src/chat/chat.service.ts (1)
102-108: Properly handling chunk parsing and status assignment
Parsing the JSON string and validating the chunk with isValidChunk is correctly implemented. Adding the status: StreamStatus.STREAMING property to each chunk ensures consistent status handling in the streaming process.
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | |||
| //function decorator for JWTAuth | |||
| import { applyDecorators, UseGuards } from '@nestjs/common'; | |||
| import { JWTAuthGuard } from 'src/guard/jwt-auth.guard'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update the import path to use relative notation.
Using 'src/' in import paths can be problematic as it assumes the directory structure. Consider using relative paths or configuring path aliases in your TypeScript configuration.
-import { JWTAuthGuard } from 'src/guard/jwt-auth.guard';
+import { JWTAuthGuard } from '../../guard/jwt-auth.guard';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { JWTAuthGuard } from 'src/guard/jwt-auth.guard'; | |
| import { JWTAuthGuard } from '../../guard/jwt-auth.guard'; |
|
|
||
| @Field() | ||
| model: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add input validation for the new model field and restore message validation.
The addition of the required model field without validation could lead to potential security issues. Additionally, the removal of validation from the message field (as noted in the summary) reduces the robustness of the input handling.
Apply this diff to add proper validation:
@InputType('ChatInputType')
export class ChatInput {
@Field()
chatId: string;
+
@Field()
+ @IsString()
+ @MinLength(1)
+ @MaxLength(2000)
message: string;
@Field()
+ @IsString()
+ @MinLength(1)
model: string;
}Don't forget to import the validation decorators:
import { IsString, MinLength, MaxLength } from 'class-validator';| <ThemeProvider attribute="class" defaultTheme="dark"> | ||
| {children} | ||
| <Toaster /> | ||
| </ThemeProvider> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding theme configuration options.
While the default theme is set to "dark", consider making it configurable and adding system theme support.
- <ThemeProvider attribute="class" defaultTheme="dark">
+ <ThemeProvider
+ attribute="class"
+ defaultTheme="dark"
+ enableSystem
+ themes={['light', 'dark']}
+ >📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <ThemeProvider attribute="class" defaultTheme="dark"> | |
| {children} | |
| <Toaster /> | |
| </ThemeProvider> | |
| <ThemeProvider | |
| attribute="class" | |
| defaultTheme="dark" | |
| enableSystem | |
| themes={['light', 'dark']} | |
| > | |
| {children} | |
| <Toaster /> | |
| </ThemeProvider> |
| try { | ||
| variables = ctx.getContext().req.body.variables; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| variables = ''; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling in variable extraction.
The current implementation silently fails and sets variables to an empty string, which might hide important debugging information.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
try {
variables = ctx.getContext().req.body.variables;
} catch (error) {
- variables = '';
+ this.logger.warn(
+ `Failed to extract variables: ${error.message}`,
+ error.stack,
+ );
+ variables = undefined;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| try { | |
| variables = ctx.getContext().req.body.variables; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| variables = ''; | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| variables = ctx.getContext().req.body.variables; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.logger.warn( | |
| `Failed to extract variables: ${error.message}`, | |
| error.stack, | |
| ); | |
| variables = undefined; | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: autofix
[warning] 21-21:
'error' is defined but never used
| async canActivate(context: ExecutionContext): Promise<boolean> { | ||
| const gqlContext = GqlExecutionContext.create(context); | ||
| const { req } = gqlContext.getContext(); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add security headers to prevent common web vulnerabilities.
Consider adding security-related headers to the response to enhance protection against various attacks.
[security]
Add the following security middleware to your main.ts:
app.use(helmet({
crossOriginEmbedderPolicy: false,
contentSecurityPolicy: {
directives: {
'default-src': ["'self'"],
'script-src': ["'self'"],
'style-src': ["'self'"],
'frame-ancestors': ["'none'"],
},
},
}));| // TODO: don't remove rn | ||
| if (jsonStr === '[DONE]') { | ||
| isDone = true; | ||
| if (resolveNextChunk) { | ||
| resolveNextChunk({ done: true, value: undefined }); | ||
| resolveNextChunk = null; | ||
| } | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| // if (jsonStr === '[DONE]') { | ||
| // const doneChunk: ChatCompletionChunk = { | ||
| // id: 'done', | ||
| // object: 'chat.completion.chunk', | ||
| // created: Date.now(), | ||
| // model: '', | ||
| // systemFingerprint: null, | ||
| // choices: [], | ||
| // status: StreamStatus.DONE, | ||
| // }; | ||
|
|
||
| // if (resolveNextChunk) { | ||
| // resolveNextChunk({ done: false, value: doneChunk }); | ||
| // resolveNextChunk = null; | ||
| // } else { | ||
| // chunkQueue.push(doneChunk); | ||
| // } | ||
| // return; | ||
| // } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove commented-out code for better maintainability
There is a large block of commented-out code from lines 82-100. Leaving such code can clutter the codebase and make maintenance harder. If this code is no longer needed, please remove it. If you need to keep it for future reference, consider using version control to retrieve it when necessary. Additionally, the TODO comment on line 78 ("don't remove rn") is unclear. Please clarify its purpose or remove it if it's outdated.
| if (!isDone) { | ||
| const doneChunk: ChatCompletionChunk = { | ||
| id: 'done', | ||
| object: 'chat.completion.chunk', | ||
| created: Date.now(), | ||
| model: 'gpt-3.5-turbo', | ||
| systemFingerprint: null, | ||
| choices: [], | ||
| status: StreamStatus.DONE, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor duplicated 'doneChunk' creation into a separate method
The doneChunk object is created identically in both the 'end' handler (lines 128-135) and the 'error' handler (lines 158-165). To improve maintainability and reduce duplication, consider extracting this logic into a private method.
Apply this diff to create a new method and use it in both places:
+ private createDoneChunk(): ChatCompletionChunk {
+ return {
+ id: 'done',
+ object: 'chat.completion.chunk',
+ created: Date.now(),
+ model: 'gpt-3.5-turbo',
+ systemFingerprint: null,
+ choices: [],
+ status: StreamStatus.DONE,
+ };
+ }
// In the 'end' handler
- const doneChunk: ChatCompletionChunk = {
- id: 'done',
- object: 'chat.completion.chunk',
- created: Date.now(),
- model: 'gpt-3.5-turbo',
- systemFingerprint: null,
- choices: [],
- status: StreamStatus.DONE,
- };
+ const doneChunk = this.createDoneChunk();
// In the 'error' handler
- const doneChunk: ChatCompletionChunk = {
- id: 'done',
- object: 'chat.completion.chunk',
- created: Date.now(),
- model: 'gpt-3.5-turbo',
- systemFingerprint: null,
- choices: [],
- status: StreamStatus.DONE,
- };
+ const doneChunk = this.createDoneChunk();Also applies to: 156-164
| @@ -267,6 +322,7 @@ | |||
| const chat = await this.chatRepository.findOne({ | |||
| where: { id: upateChatTitleInput.chatId, isDeleted: false }, | |||
| }); | |||
| new Logger('chat').log('chat', chat); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Instantiate Logger at class level and avoid redundant logging
You're creating a new Logger('chat') instance inside the updateChatTitle method on line 325. To follow best practices, instantiate the logger as a class-level property. This ensures consistent logging and avoids unnecessary instantiation. Also, be cautious when logging entire objects like chat, as it may include sensitive information.
Apply this diff to move the logger to the class level and adjust the logging:
+ private readonly logger = new Logger('ChatService');
// Inside the updateChatTitle method
- new Logger('chat').log('chat', chat);
+ this.logger.log(`Updating chat title for chatId: ${chat?.id}`);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| //if the chat id not exist, dont save this messages | ||
| if (!chat) { | ||
| return null; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct comment grammar and reconsider error handling in 'saveMessage'
The comment on line 341 has grammatical errors. It should be corrected for clarity.
Also, currently, if the chat does not exist, saveMessage returns null. Depending on how this method is used, it might be better to throw an error to notify the caller that the chat was not found, instead of returning null, which might lead to unexpected behavior if not handled properly.
Apply this diff to fix the comment:
-//if the chat id not exist, dont save this messages
+// If the chat ID does not exist, do not save the messageConsider updating the error handling strategy:
if (!chat) {
- return null;
+ throw new Error('Chat not found');
}Ensure that the calling code is updated to handle this exception appropriately.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| //if the chat id not exist, dont save this messages | |
| if (!chat) { | |
| return null; | |
| } | |
| // If the chat ID does not exist, do not save the message | |
| if (!chat) { | |
| throw new Error('Chat not found'); | |
| } |
| private isValidChunk(chunk: any): boolean { | ||
| return ( | ||
| chunk && | ||
| typeof chunk.id === 'string' && | ||
| typeof chunk.object === 'string' && | ||
| typeof chunk.created === 'number' && | ||
| typeof chunk.model === 'string' | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance validation in 'isValidChunk' to include all expected properties
The isValidChunk method currently checks for id, object, created, and model properties. Since ChatCompletionChunk also includes status and choices, consider updating the validation to include these properties to ensure all chunks are fully validated.
Apply this diff to enhance validation:
return (
chunk &&
typeof chunk.id === 'string' &&
typeof chunk.object === 'string' &&
typeof chunk.created === 'number' &&
typeof chunk.model === 'string' &&
+ typeof chunk.status === 'string' &&
+ Array.isArray(chunk.choices)
);Additionally, you might want to validate that chunk.status is a valid StreamStatus value.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private isValidChunk(chunk: any): boolean { | |
| return ( | |
| chunk && | |
| typeof chunk.id === 'string' && | |
| typeof chunk.object === 'string' && | |
| typeof chunk.created === 'number' && | |
| typeof chunk.model === 'string' | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| private isValidChunk(chunk: any): boolean { | |
| return ( | |
| chunk && | |
| typeof chunk.id === 'string' && | |
| typeof chunk.object === 'string' && | |
| typeof chunk.created === 'number' && | |
| typeof chunk.model === 'string' && | |
| typeof chunk.status === 'string' && | |
| Array.isArray(chunk.choices) | |
| ); | |
| } |
#9
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
LoginPagecomponent for user authentication.AuthProviderfor managing authentication state across the application.RootProviderto wrap components with necessary context providers.ChatBottombarwith voice input functionality.useModelshook for fetching model tags with caching.LocalStoreenum for consistent local storage references.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style
Tests
Chores