Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add build and start scripts for frontend and backend #143

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

Sma1lboy
Copy link
Owner

@Sma1lboy Sma1lboy commented Mar 3, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added dedicated commands for building and starting both the frontend and backend, offering improved operational clarity and separation between environments.
  • Chores

    • Refined task dependencies and command configurations to enhance performance, streamline development workflows, and simplify maintenance.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates various package configuration files by adding new script entries that separately handle frontend and backend tasks. Multiple package.json files now include dedicated commands for building and starting either the frontend or backend using different command runners (pnpm, Next.js, and turbo). Additionally, the turbo configuration file was refactored to define new tasks with caching settings.

Changes

Files Change Summary
backend/package.json, llm-server/package.json, codefox-common/package.json Added backend-specific scripts ("build:backend", "start:backend") using pnpm. Additionally, llm-server/package.json includes minor formatting fixes, and codefox-common/package.json adds alias scripts for both backend and frontend builds.
frontend/package.json, package.json Added frontend-specific scripts – in frontend/package.json, "build:frontend": "next build" was added and "start:dev" was replaced by "start:frontend": "next start", while the root package.json was updated to include turbo commands for both frontend and backend builds and starts.
turbo.json Added new tasks (start:frontend, start:backend, build:frontend, build:backend) with specific caching configurations.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant Turbo
    participant FE as Frontend App
    participant BE as Backend App

    Dev->>Turbo: Run "turbo build:frontend"
    Turbo->>FE: Execute "next build"
    FE-->>Turbo: Build completed

    Dev->>Turbo: Run "turbo start:frontend"
    Turbo->>FE: Execute "next start"
    FE-->>Turbo: Startup complete

    Dev->>Turbo: Run "turbo build:backend"
    Turbo->>BE: Execute "pnpm build"
    BE-->>Turbo: Build completed

    Dev->>Turbo: Run "turbo start:backend"
    Turbo->>BE: Execute "pnpm start"
    BE-->>Turbo: Startup complete
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ZHallen122

Poem

I'm a little rabbit, hopping with delight,
New scripts abound, making build tasks light.
Frontend and backend now clearly part of the play,
Turbo and pnpm guide my code each day.
With nimble hops, I celebrate this bright array.
🐇✨ Code bounces forward in a brand new way!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1041b7 and a298a6f.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • backend/package.json (1 hunks)
  • codefox-common/package.json (1 hunks)
  • frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
  • llm-server/package.json (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • turbo.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
  • backend/package.json
  • llm-server/package.json
  • codefox-common/package.json
  • frontend/package.json
  • turbo.json
  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Install and Build Frontend

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
llm-server/package.json (1)

14-14: Minor Formatting Improvement for the Format Command
The adjustment removing trailing spaces in the "format": "prettier --write \"src/**/*.ts\"" command is a good cleanup to maintain consistency in script definitions.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48ddc99 and d1041b7.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • backend/package.json (2 hunks)
  • codefox-common/package.json (2 hunks)
  • frontend/package.json (2 hunks)
  • llm-server/package.json (2 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
  • turbo.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: autofix
  • GitHub Check: Install and Build LLM Server
  • GitHub Check: Install and Build Backend
  • GitHub Check: Install and Build Frontend
🔇 Additional comments (17)
frontend/package.json (2)

7-7: New Frontend Build Script Added
The addition of "build:frontend": "next build" clearly separates the frontend build process from the generic build command. This enhances clarity when invoking frontend-specific builds.


9-9: Renamed/Updated Start Script for Frontend
Replacing the previous "start:dev" entry with "start:frontend": "next start" ensures that the startup command more explicitly targets the production or designated frontend environment. Make sure related documentation or deployment scripts are updated accordingly.

backend/package.json (2)

11-11: New Backend Build Script Introduced
The addition of "build:backend": "pnpm build" provides a dedicated command for backend builds. Please verify that this alias (which differs from "build": "nest build") correctly triggers the complete build process for your backend services.


16-16: New Backend Start Script Added
The inclusion of "start:backend": "pnpm start" clarifies starting the backend independently from the primary start command. Confirm that pnpm start correctly resolves to the intended backend startup procedure.

codefox-common/package.json (1)

22-23: Added Build Aliases for Frontend and Backend
The new "build:frontend": "pnpm run build" and "build:backend": "pnpm run build" scripts act as aliases for the existing build process. While these do not differentiate between distinct build mechanisms, they help provide semantic clarity. Consider whether future differentiation might require separate implementations.

package.json (2)

10-11: New Turbo Build Commands for Frontend & Backend
The introduction of "build:frontend": "turbo build:frontend" and "build:backend": "turbo build:backend" leverages Turbo’s orchestration to separately trigger build processes for different parts of the application. Please ensure that the associated Turbo configuration file defines these tasks and dependency relationships correctly.


19-21: New Turbo Start Commands Added
Adding "start:frontend": "turbo start:frontend" and "start:backend": "turbo start:backend" further separates concerns by providing dedicated commands for starting different parts of the application. Verify that these commands integrate seamlessly with your overall start-up flow and that the generic "start": "turbo start" command still works as intended for fallback or unified operations.

llm-server/package.json (2)

8-9: Dedicated Backend Start Command Added
The new "start:backend": "pnpm start" entry adds a clear, dedicated command to start backend processes in the llm-server project. Ensure that this command triggers the correct startup logic intended for the backend.


11-12: New Backend Build Script Inclusion
The addition of "build:backend": "pnpm build" provides a convenient alias to build the backend portion of the application. Please double-check that the underlying build process (invoked by pnpm build) covers all necessary steps and configurations for a successful backend build.

turbo.json (8)

5-10: Improved Readability in "build" Task.
The build task's dependsOn array has been reformatted to a multi-line format, enhancing readability while preserving the original dependency logic.


13-17: Consistent Multi-line Formatting for "test" Task.
The test task now uses a multi-line array for its dependsOn property, which improves clarity without altering business logic.


18-23: Enhanced Readability in "lint" Task.
The lint task's dependsOn array is now formatted as a multi-line list. This change is aesthetic and helps maintain consistency with the other tasks.


27-32: Updated "start" Task Formatting.
The existing start task is now using a multi-line array for its dependency (^build) and explicitly sets "cache": false, aligning with the intended behavior for startup tasks.


33-38: New "start:frontend" Task Added.
The new start:frontend task correctly uses a multi-line dependsOn array with the dependency ^build and disables caching by setting "cache": false. Please verify that using "^build" as the dependency aligns with your frontend build requirements.


39-44: New "start:backend" Task Added.
The added start:backend task follows a similar pattern to the frontend counterpart, with a dependency on "^build" and caching disabled. Ensure this dependency configuration matches the intended backend startup sequence.


45-50: New "build:frontend" Task Added: Dependency Check.
The build:frontend task now depends on "^build:frontend" and enables caching. Verify that referencing ^build:frontend does not introduce a circular dependency and correctly triggers all necessary subbuilds for the frontend.


51-56: New "build:backend" Task Added: Dependency Check.
The new build:backend task is configured similarly to the frontend build task, with a dependency on "^build:backend" and caching enabled. Please confirm that this setup accurately reflects the intended build order without causing dependency issues.

@Sma1lboy Sma1lboy merged commit 7136304 into main Mar 3, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
Sma1lboy added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2025
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Added dedicated commands for building and starting both the frontend
and backend, offering improved operational clarity and separation
between environments.

- **Chores**
- Refined task dependencies and command configurations to enhance
performance, streamline development workflows, and simplify maintenance.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant