New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Possible positional freedom of xsd might be more than is implemented #80

Open

rimachaudhari opened this issue Nov 15, 2018 · 0 comments

rimachaudhari commented Nov 15, 2018 •

edited

Loading

https://github.com/RuleML/deliberation-ruleml/blob/1.03-psoa/relaxng/modules/unordered_deterministic_groups_expansion_module.rnc

argumentsForAtoms.sequence |=
  slotdepTermsForAtoms.sequence, slotTermsForAtoms.sequence,
  (((termsForAtoms.nonemptysequence.choice, repo?) | repo),
   slotdepTermsForAtoms.sequence, slotTermsForAtoms.sequence)?,
  resl?

could become

argumentsForAtoms.sequence |=
  (slotdepTermsForAtoms.sequence & slotTermsForAtoms.sequence),
  (((termsForAtoms.nonemptysequence.choice, repo?) | repo),
   (slotdepTermsForAtoms.sequence & slotTermsForAtoms.sequence))?,
  resl?

and similarly for Expr.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

greenTara mentioned this issue

Add PSOA tuples #79

Closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment