Please add back DIP721 Namespace in v2

[skilesare]

We have a significant amount of work done that relies on the standard being namespace. We really want to support the standard and having namespace enables us to do so without having to choose between supporting both EXT and DIP721. We are working on a superset that theoretically supports both standards as well as adding significant functionality.

[ozwaldorf]

We have brought this issue up internally, and should see some action about it soon.

[ozwaldorf]

See #64 and #65

[ozwaldorf]

Done!

[skilesare]

You can see https://ic.rocks/principal/twdpa-6qaaa-aaaaj-adeuq-cai where we have started to implement compatibility. Right now most Namespaced functions fit, but we are a standard away from that not being the case. For token Id ogy.nftforgood_uffc.0 = 506430908665478095819351049143682116677979599480674593646805032275093264206530900893573380022711374121328107580256897573662199432890795996497345744496072800665191463600997076590297474522763231280 (I think…Icrocks doesn’t like long numbers)…not at a computer right now.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 9:42 AM ossian ***@***.***> wrote: We have brought this issue up internally, and should see some action about it soon. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#59 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE5COYHIJRJX7RZX2RAUK3VHVBF5ANCNFSM5TMORFUA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Austin Fatheree twitter: @afat http://twitter.com/afat