Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confusion about the swin transformer code. #5

Open
guoyage opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Confusion about the swin transformer code. #5

guoyage opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@guoyage
Copy link

guoyage commented May 22, 2024

Hello author, thank you for your wonderful research. I have a small problem. As can be seen from the research results of your paper, swin transformer module has a great impact on the performance of your model. When I try to adopt swin transformer module, I find that your code is missing the relevant codes of self.weights. I used a simple linear layer instead, but the results are not ideal. I hope you can clarify the source code of your self.weights, looking forward to your reply.

@FranklinNotOld
Copy link
Collaborator

FranklinNotOld commented Nov 11, 2024

Do you mean there's lack of a pre-trained weight in Informer part? If so, the Informer could be trained during the teacher training process. Or you could provide the complete error message of 'self.weights' so I can check whether I miss something.

@Petrichor625
Copy link
Owner

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out and for your interest in our work!

It appears that an earlier upload may have included files from a related project, which could have caused the missing components you encountered. We apologize for any confusion this may have caused. We have now uploaded the correct, complete version of the code, including all necessary modules and weights.

Please pull the latest version, and feel free to reach out if you have any further questions or encounter any other challenges—we’re here to support you.

Thank you again for your understanding and patience, and we’re excited to see your work with the updated code!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants