-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switch from jest to vitest #264
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for cheery-moxie-4f1121 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 4ead1f9
this new frameworks looks much better than jest
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
re-tACK fd738fd
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tACK fbc3df3
Framework looks to be better suited to our needs good deal
Abstract
Jest had some problems, like not supporting ES6 by default and having to mock some modules to make it run.
Vitest works much better out of the box, and doesn't require anything else, like the babel dependency.
TrasnferMenu tests were also added, to check for automatic price update, and the close and send event
Testing
No testing is required