You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Which problem would you like to address? Please describe.
Reference the name of a petab estimation problem in its yaml file with a petabId or modelId field.
Until now, the name of a petab is coded implicitly by the naming convention experimentalCondition_petabId.tsv, etc.
In petab_select and potentially other applications we encounter a lot of different models, which might be derived from the same base petab.
Therefore, having the petabId in the yaml would provide more flexibility in terms of renaming the tsv files (not necessary anymore) but still keeping the benefit of having a unique Id for each estimation problem
Describe the solution you would like
Inlcude a field petabId in the yaml which accepts character inputs
Describe alternatives you have considered
Additional context
We discussed this in the context of a petab_select meeting. I'm just putting it here so it's not forgotten
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @dlill , thanks for your suggestion. We are currently preparing a proposal for allowing non-SBML models in PEtab, this will also include model IDs. More details in about 2 weeks.
Hey, I am currently moving out of the sysbio-field and will probably not work with petab anymore. But to quickly answer your question, with modelId I actually meant petabId, to enable referencing the petab problem itself by an ID. This would be helpful e.g. in model selection or also in visual comparisons of different models
Which problem would you like to address? Please describe.
Reference the name of a petab estimation problem in its yaml file with a
petabId
ormodelId
field.Until now, the name of a petab is coded implicitly by the naming convention
experimentalCondition_petabId.tsv
, etc.In petab_select and potentially other applications we encounter a lot of different models, which might be derived from the same base petab.
Therefore, having the
petabId
in the yaml would provide more flexibility in terms of renaming the tsv files (not necessary anymore) but still keeping the benefit of having a unique Id for each estimation problemDescribe the solution you would like
Inlcude a field
petabId
in the yaml which accepts character inputsDescribe alternatives you have considered
Additional context
We discussed this in the context of a petab_select meeting. I'm just putting it here so it's not forgotten
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: