-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Package upgrades #72
Package upgrades #72
Conversation
KubernetesClient shouldn't be private as your package needs it to work right? |
KubernetesClient shouldn't be private as your package needs it to work right? @vader1986 @galvesribeiro |
Yes, sorry my mistake |
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ | |||
</ItemGroup> | |||
|
|||
<ItemGroup> | |||
<PackageReference Include="KubernetesClient" Version="10.0.31" PrivateAssets="All" /> | |||
<PackageReference Include="KubernetesClient" Version="10.0.31" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was this PR, that's why I didn't upgrade:
#69
But makes sense to me. Will include that upgrade here.
LGTM? |
No description provided.