Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parameterize the traefik version and bump to 3.3.2 #1822

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Parameterize the traefik version and bump to 3.3.2 #1822

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

jmthomas
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jmthomas jmthomas requested a review from ryanmelt January 11, 2025 19:02
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.58%. Comparing base (e319cdb) to head (06135d7).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1822      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.56%   79.58%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         517      517              
  Lines       40739    40739              
==========================================
+ Hits        32414    32424      +10     
+ Misses       8325     8315      -10     
Flag Coverage Δ
python 84.32% <ø> (+0.06%) ⬆️
ruby-api 48.64% <ø> (ø)
ruby-backend 82.61% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jmthomas jmthomas changed the title Parameterize the traefik version and bump to 3.3.1 Parameterize the traefik version and bump to 3.3.2 Jan 15, 2025
@jmthomas jmthomas merged commit 8e78a6c into main Jan 15, 2025
26 of 28 checks passed
@jmthomas jmthomas deleted the traefik branch January 15, 2025 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants