You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We computed the perimeter of all lakes in Fennoscandia. However, the perimeter can vary a lot depending on how detailed the underlying polygon is. Since we have lakes from different kinds of sources, we should check if the level of detail is comparable across all of the lakes.
Otherwise there might be a danger for wrong data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good point.
When working on different countries, different data sources and different levels of detail are just a reality.
What can be done is to count the number of vertices and relate that number to the perimeter. That way we get an impression of the precision of the digitization.
If the precision effect is significant would be another question (e.g. how much does perimeter vary between really complex and simple lake geometries, and between lake geometries with different digitization scale....)
We computed the perimeter of all lakes in Fennoscandia. However, the perimeter can vary a lot depending on how detailed the underlying polygon is. Since we have lakes from different kinds of sources, we should check if the level of detail is comparable across all of the lakes.
Otherwise there might be a danger for wrong data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: