You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Birli uses the same polarization convention as Cotter for backwards compatibility.
The Aips117 memo is ambiguous about which polarization convention to use.
This convention appears to currently be X as EW and Y as NS [Citation needed, it would be good to show some evidence here]
The IAU convention appears to be the opposite, X as NS and Y as EW [Note: it would be good to point to where speicifically it says this]
This is contentious topic and there are arguments for both staying consistent, and switching to the "correct" convention. Birli should be able to accommodate both options.
The plan is to:
introduce an optional command line flag that will flip from the polarisation convention
give people some time to play with this flag and provide feedback on the implications of switching convention
if the benefits outweigh the costs, then switch the default convention to IAU
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
we should add 'IAUORDER' keyword to the uvfits header which is either F for False or T for True. People could have a switch in their pipelines that just assumes this is False if the header isn't present for backwards compatibility.
See this paper here with Figure 1 showing x = North and y = East as the IAU definition (the paper also cites the source of the definition). As for written evidence as to why most uvfits seem to have x = East, I can find an example in pyuvdatahere that has x as being East (snippet of code that say the below - it's about beams, but should apply to uvfits as well I imagine): # check the x_orientation print(uvb.x_orientation) east
This is contentious topic and there are arguments for both staying consistent, and switching to the "correct" convention. Birli should be able to accommodate both options.
The plan is to:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: