Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
App storage functionality simplification #865
base: API_LEVEL_22
Are you sure you want to change the base?
App storage functionality simplification #865
Changes from all commits
5a0ad66
6654e6b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jarevalo-ledger >> to add preprocessor checking for
HAVE_APP_STORAGE
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We do not run processor against the
.ld
files currently.If no variable is declared in
storage_section
it will not occupy anything.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Linked to https://github.com/LedgerHQ/ledger-secure-sdk/pull/865/files#r1961794237
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Current version supports 2 approaches:
app_storage
API, backupable and restorableN_
variable (legacy approach), NOT backupable and restorableI do not see anything bad to support the both it gives the possibility to user to backuping/restoring some data. And it will work for apps that have not yet migrated to the new API (we'll need tests for all this).