Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Versioning requirements in lar packages #7

Open
nathanielerowe opened this issue Oct 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Versioning requirements in lar packages #7

nathanielerowe opened this issue Oct 23, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@nathanielerowe
Copy link

I was recently working with a spack build of sbndcode@09_91_02_01 and found that some of their .fcl files could not run due to the addition of PFPModuleLabel in larreco's GnocchiCalorimetry. This was due to sbncode and larsoft being out of step with larreco in our spack build.

I was able to rebuild using the appropriate larreco version, and the .fcl file now runs, but is there a plan to put in stricter versioning requirements in the default larsoft spack recipes to avoid similar scenarios in the future? Or is the intent for the user to specify specific versions of all "lar" packages when concretizing? Was mainly just wondering if there was an agreed upon solution to this general problem that had not yet been implemented.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant