Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(EVERYONE!) Pixelfy 3.0 is not compatible with Magisk newer than 27! (OG Title) Magisk 28.1 and oos 12 not compatible with 3.0 #361

Open
Bradford1040 opened this issue Feb 14, 2025 · 8 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Bradford1040
Copy link

Device name: OnePlus 7t pro NR (HD1925)
Rom name: oxygen os
Android version: 12
Pixelify version: 3.0

Bug Description:
I updated magisk 27000 to 28.1and was stuck at fastboot, was able to get into OOS 12 recovery but had lost all my backup files so fixing that ROM was a lost cause! I used MSM unbrick back to OOS 11, and updated back to OOS 12, installed magisk 28.1 booted & flashed fine, after pixelfy install and reboot stuck at fastboot again so booted stock boot.img and it started, uninstalled 28.1 and installed 27.0 (27000) patched boot.img reboot to bootloader first booted patched image booted fine and showed rooted and pixelfy installed,so went back to bootloader and flashed, no issues

@Bradford1040 Bradford1040 added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 14, 2025
@CallMeShepard
Copy link

CallMeShepard commented Feb 15, 2025

Same bootloop issue.
For some reason couldn't get a log file from TWRP during bootloop. (I hope I'll retrieve it somehow in future)
Tried with Magisk 28.1 and Magisk 27008, but it leads to bootloop after flashing Pixelify in Magisk.
(Was enabling only Google Photo unlimited storage and Google Photo backup options)
But with Magisk 27000, as mentioned, everything works fine.

Device name: Samsung Galaxy M21 (M215F)
Rom name: OneUI 4.1
ARM64 device
Android ver.: 12
Pixelify ver.: 3.0

P.S. I managed to exit bootloop without data loss, but with TWRP and Magisk uninstalled after flashing a .tar archive with one stock boot.img.lz4 file inside it. Flashing in AP slot via Odin3 v3.14

@Bradford1040
Copy link
Author

You should be able to patch your stock boot.Img with magisk 27000, of course try booting it before you boot flash it, I am a big double check guy, my biggest issue with me device/phone it is a special device with T-Mobile branding so finding a good custom ROM is difficult, and there really is no way to TWRP mount & back the device up, I can only boot TWRP not flash to both recovery slots, I mean I can but it's basically useless for what TWRP main reason is!

@CallMeShepard
Copy link

Yeah, thanks for the recommendation, I thought about it, but the point is that TWRP for some reason couldn't get into internal storage and root (like /data/adb/ where you can remove broken Magisk modules that cause bootloop). And to make backups in general, apparently. I tried entering the command twrp decrypt <mypassword> but it notified me that there is no crypto support in this build, which is very annoying (this TWRP is from the official site, specifically for M21). I decided to try to rebuild my TWRP with support for this feature, but the result was a bootloop, but because of the recovery.

I could of course forget about it, but the funny thing is that in order to install TWRP I have to erase the data (and system won't replace TWRP with stock recovery), which makes me stumped. I wanted to backup boot with patched Magisk and also TWRP at the same time, but again the problem is that TWRP doesn't get root access, although it should. That's sucks.

The best I've been able to do so far is to revert to stock boot, as I said before, and exit bootloop with loss of TWRP and Root, but without loss of personal data. I would like TWRP to be fully functional with Magisk and perform its tasks (backup in particular) and retrieve log file to help Pixelify developers to fix that strange bootloop issue

@Bradford1040
Copy link
Author

well I always was under impression that Samsung had to use odin to do everything? I left samsung devices as I hated odin and bricked a few phones (many years ago) I have been using OnePlus phones for a long time now, this one I use is a bit of a pain (did not know going in) but found out most ways around the short falls, and its still a beast! Even though it's a 2019 flagship phone. still handles it all today with no issue! SD 855+, 12gb ram, 256 storage, 1440p 90hz screen, so todays phones are not much better, My daughter has an S21+ and its only got that 100x zoom that destroys my idea that I have a good phone LMAO! But other than that we are equal

@sanaullah22444
Copy link

"- Device platform: arm64-v8a

  • Installing: 28.1 (28100)
    Processing zip file ! Installation failed"
    I'm facing this problem in Google Pixel 3Xl device
    Android version 12

@Bradford1040
Copy link
Author

Bradford1040 commented Feb 20, 2025

I would just uninstall 28.1 and install 27.0 patch the boot.img and flash the 27 patched image

You should be able to do what I did. Just boot with un-patched boot.img

@sanaullah22444
Copy link

sanaullah22444 commented Feb 21, 2025 via email

@Bradford1040
Copy link
Author

Kindly guide me how can i install Magisk on pixel 3xl device

I would say look on XDA or ask someone in a Telegram or discord group, I am not a Pixel Owner so not 100% sure of how pixel's work to do that, I am only used to what devices I have

@Bradford1040 Bradford1040 changed the title Magisk 28.1 and oos 12 not compatible with 3.0 (EVERYONE!) Pixelfy is not compatible with Magisk newer than 27! (OG Title) Magisk 28.1 and oos 12 not compatible with 3.0 Feb 25, 2025
@Bradford1040 Bradford1040 changed the title (EVERYONE!) Pixelfy is not compatible with Magisk newer than 27! (OG Title) Magisk 28.1 and oos 12 not compatible with 3.0 (EVERYONE!) Pixelfy 3.0 is not compatible with Magisk newer than 27! (OG Title) Magisk 28.1 and oos 12 not compatible with 3.0 Feb 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants