You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not sure whether the revolution_number is supposed to change with an epoch change, but it seems like it probably should account for the revolutions that occur between the original epoch and the new epoch (assuming it's more than a partial revolution).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have one question, should we assume that the revolution starts at the current epoch or when the satellite crosses the argument of perigee? I have no idea what is the best approach here.
I don't know when a satellite's "revolution counter" starts, but I assume it is independent from the epoch of the TLE (which I assume is baed on whenever the observations from which the TLE was derived happened rather than anything inherent to the orbital parameters). I guess one could determine the reference point of the revolution counter by comparing the values from different epoch across multiple satellites. Maybe it counts how many times it has passed the ascending node???
Not sure whether the
revolution_number
is supposed to change with an epoch change, but it seems like it probably should account for the revolutions that occur between the original epoch and the new epoch (assuming it's more than a partial revolution).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: