Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Stale Shares #15

Open
TheDarkCryptoMiner opened this issue Jul 14, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Question: Stale Shares #15

TheDarkCryptoMiner opened this issue Jul 14, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@TheDarkCryptoMiner
Copy link

TheDarkCryptoMiner commented Jul 14, 2017

Update: (ignore stale shares - will test WAN faking from other thread):

Running 9.6 - testing it out, I have noticed that I am getting a marked increase of stale shares (see screenshot)

I get the warning (as per the other issue and the doc about a local address/proxy) and ignored it, but
there is a 10% stale share in a few places - see screenshot (the empty spot in the middle is the changeover to proxy)

This may be early days, I will watch and see - this may be dag file swap related or perhaps a connection issue to ethermine - I found I had connection issues to ethermine with the "may be temporary" message.

Also, are you averse to a pull request that will allow failovers (e.g. eu1 or eu2 if main fails to connect?) in the section where it has the "may be temporary" message?

image

@drdada drdada self-assigned this Jul 14, 2017
@drdada
Copy link
Collaborator

drdada commented Jul 14, 2017

Hello,
I think you saw it but for stale share please see #7

I will see if i can enhance the proxy with a failover feature. This message is caused by a TCP disconnection.

@TheDarkCryptoMiner
Copy link
Author

Thanks. I realised #7 and had updated the issue. I am about 85% done on a pull request that has simple failover for same pool. Should finish it in the next 8 hours (afk atm)

@TheDarkCryptoMiner
Copy link
Author

Actually. I will see about running multiple instances and use those as failovers

@drdada drdada mentioned this issue Jul 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants