Removes snowflake malum's fire code, adds support for Extra Spells. #1414
+8
−9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
About The Pull Request
Gee Malum, how come Aeon lets you have TWO T0 spells?
In all seriousness, this just adds support for adding spells that don't fit into available T0-4 slots. Malum's fire is basically just sacred flame but without a slot, this adds in proper support. It works as far as I can tell.
Why It's Good For The Game
Less snowflake code is good, and this allows for more creative spells in the future given how constricting a 4 spell limit can sometimes be, especially if many users cannot use every single spell (templars, looking @ you.)