fix: return correct operations from coin and message inputs

[maschad]

• Closes Empty operation being returned in txSummary #2763

• Related to fix: use fuels pr-2479 to ensure correct operations are shown fuels-wallet#1419

Release notes

In this release, we:

• Fixed getInputFromAssetId so it returns the correct InputCoin and InputMessage

Summary

At the moment getContractCallOperations is currently returning empty operations on wallets that only have an InputMessage but no InputCoin , this is because getInputFromAssetId function was only returning messageInputs with the 32ZeroBytes hex, which of course excludes any input from a contract call that has a separate assetId such as a predicate call.

Notes

The best way to verify that this fix works is to use this branches build with the fuel-wallet and test it against the connectors. FuelLabs/fuels-wallet#1415 goes into greater detail on how to reproduce the scenarios.

Checklist

• I added — tests to prove my changes
• I've tested this on https://connectors.fuel.network/ with the fuel-wallet
• I updated — all the necessary docs
• I reviewed — the entire PR myself, using the GitHub UI
• I described — all breaking changes and the Migration Guide

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
fuels-ts	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jul 18, 2024 2:32pm

[petertonysmith94]

Do a contract call with an account that only have message to fund the transaction (to do that you can receive from the bridge as funds bridged will be message in fuel side)

Would it be worth adding a fuel-gauge test around this use-case?

[github-actions]

This PR is published in NPM with version 0.0.0-pr-2782-20240724204846

[maschad]

Thanks for the confirmation @Torres-ssf I was unaware that's how a spendable message could be seeded. I've added a corresponding test in 2a5abea I had to remove the zero amountPerCoin constraint as well so that we could simulate the scenario in the issue.

[danielbate]

👏🏻

[github-actions]

Coverage Report:

Lines	Branches	Functions	Statements
79.5%(+0.01%)	71.8%(+0.01%)	77.48%(+0.02%)	79.64%(+0.01%)

Changed Files:

Ok	File (✨=New File)	Lines	Branches	Functions	Statements
🔴	packages/account/src/providers/transaction-summary/input.ts	96.42% (-3.58%)	93.33% (-6.67%)	100% (+0%)	96.77% (-3.23%)
🔴	packages/account/src/providers/transaction-summary/operations.ts	95.49% (+0.95%)	71.92% (+1.02%)	92.5% (+0%)	94.16% (+0.89%)