You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Identify and count "Lost cause" students. 3 conditions: low pre-test, getting a lot of yellow without slacking, and low on post-test
Find the "superstar" students who are getting mostly stars or green and rerun the difficulty analysis without them, looking for converging evidence.
2) Amount of time CPI students spent doing topomath problems. Min, max, average times. Histogram maybe?
3) Look at solver post-test, and label students as "topomath method user" or "non-topomath method user" Then look at which type of student (never used, could have opted out, mandatory user) was in each category
4) Compare post-test scores of students who finished vs students who didn't. Cross this by mandatory/not mandatory.
We can intervene on slacking, not finishing the training, and not using the method on the exam.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One difficulty analysis is based on the yellows (already done).
Another is time/# of nodes. A fast rate could correlate with slacking.
Could we detect cases where people struggle a little and then start slacking through the rest?
If the malleable middle is spending a moderate amount of time, that's good.
We can intervene on slacking, not finishing the training, and not using the method on the exam.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: