Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): bump bytes from 1.9.0 to 1.10.0 #488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 10, 2025

Bumps bytes from 1.9.0 to 1.10.0.

Release notes

Sourced from bytes's releases.

Bytes v1.10.0

1.10.0 (February 3rd, 2025)

Added

  • Add feature to support platforms without atomic CAS (#467)
  • try_get_* methods for Buf trait (#753)
  • Implement Buf::chunks_vectored for Take (#617)
  • Implement Buf::chunks_vectored for VecDeque<u8> (#708)

Fixed

  • Remove incorrect guarantee for chunks_vectored (#754)
  • Ensure that tests pass under panic=abort (#749)
Changelog

Sourced from bytes's changelog.

1.10.0 (February 3rd, 2025)

Added

  • Add feature to support platforms without atomic CAS (#467)
  • try_get_* methods for Buf trait (#753)
  • Implement Buf::chunks_vectored for Take (#617)
  • Implement Buf::chunks_vectored for VecDeque<u8> (#708)

Fixed

  • Remove incorrect guarantee for chunks_vectored (#754)
  • Ensure that tests pass under panic=abort (#749)
Commits
  • e0f3a25 chore: prepare bytes v1.10.0 (#766)
  • 16fd473 Add feature to support platforms without atomic CAS (#467)
  • 71824b0 ci: test AArch64 and run tests instead of build in cross job (#763)
  • 7a87660 Use [lints] to address unexpected_cfgs lint (#762)
  • 3ab876f Try get methods for Buf trait (#753)
  • a1b1208 Disable test_bytes_vec_alloc test on miri (#755)
  • aae4969 Add specialized Buf::chunks_vectored for Take (#617)
  • 103d7bf Remove incorrect guarantee for chunks_vectored (#754)
  • 16cc574 Implement Buf::chunks_vectored for VecDeque\<u8> (#708)
  • 0e9e4fc Expand Buf tests (#747)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Feb 10, 2025
@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 15:52
@dependabot dependabot bot added the rust Pull requests that update Rust code label Feb 10, 2025
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Regression Detector (DogStatsD)

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 8b522032-5a2c-4724-a958-2ec0ee61221a

Baseline: 7.63.0-rc.2
Comparison: 7.63.0-rc.2

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
dsd_uds_40mb_12k_contexts_40_senders ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_dualship ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.05, +0.03] 1
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only memory utilization -0.44 [-0.59, -0.29] 1
dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput -0.61 [-0.74, -0.48] 1
quality_gates_idle_rss memory utilization -1.92 [-2.02, -1.81] 1

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
quality_gates_idle_rss memory_usage 0/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Regression Detector (Saluki)

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 79c72a9a-ef66-4d0d-85e7-d2c6846e7d0d

Baseline: 535a88b
Comparison: 8288ec5
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +1.58 [+1.46, +1.69] 1
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.01, +0.05] 1
dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.03, +0.04] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.01, +0.02] 1
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.04, +0.05] 1
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_dualship ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 1
dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining_no_allocs ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.07, +0.06] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1
dsd_uds_40mb_12k_contexts_40_senders ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.04, +0.03] 1
dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.07, +0.05] 1
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit ingress throughput -0.05 [-0.31, +0.21] 1
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only memory utilization -0.48 [-0.59, -0.38] 1
quality_gates_idle_rss memory utilization -1.38 [-1.41, -1.35] 1

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
quality_gates_idle_rss memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Regression Detector Links

Experiment Result Links

experiment link(s)
dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_dualship [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_40mb_12k_contexts_40_senders [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
quality_gates_idle_rss [Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining (ADP only) [Profiling (ADP)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining_no_allocs (ADP only) [Profiling (ADP)] [SMP Dashboard]

Bumps [bytes](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes) from 1.9.0 to 1.10.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/tokio-rs/bytes/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](tokio-rs/bytes@v1.9.0...v1.10.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: bytes
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/cargo/bytes-1.10.0 branch from 8288ec5 to f620993 Compare February 10, 2025 21:01
@tobz tobz merged commit 4100fad into main Feb 10, 2025
11 of 15 checks passed
@tobz tobz deleted the dependabot/cargo/bytes-1.10.0 branch February 10, 2025 21:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file rust Pull requests that update Rust code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant