chore(deps): bump uuid from 1.12.1 to 1.13.1 #485

dependabot · 2025-02-10T15:51:22Z

Bumps uuid from 1.12.1 to 1.13.1.

Release notes

1.13.1

What's Changed

Fix wasm32 with atomics by @bushrat011899 in uuid-rs/uuid#797

Prepare for 1.13.1 release by @KodrAus in uuid-rs/uuid#799

New Contributors

@bushrat011899 made their first contribution in uuid-rs/uuid#797

Full Changelog: uuid-rs/uuid@1.13.0...1.13.1

1.13.0

⚠️ Potential Breakage

This release updates our version of getrandom to 0.3 and rand to 0.9. It is a potentially breaking change for the following users:

no-std users who enable the rng feature

uuid still uses getrandom by default on these platforms. Upgrade your version of getrandom and follow its new docs on configuring a custom backend.

wasm32-unknown-unknown users who enable the rng feature without the js feature

Upgrade your version of getrandom and follow its new docs on configuring a backend.

You'll also need to enable the rng-getrandom or rng-rand feature of uuid to force it to use getrandom as its backend:
[dependencies.uuid]
version = "1.13.0"
- features = ["v4"]
+ features = ["v4", "rng-getrandom"]
[dependencies.getrandom]
version = "0.3"
If you're on wasm32-unknown-unknown and using the js feature of uuid you shouldn't see any breakage. We've kept this behavior by vendoring in getrandom's web-based backend when the js feature is enabled.

What's Changed

Update getrandom to 0.3 and rand to 0.9 by @KodrAus in uuid-rs/uuid#793

Support forcing getrandom on wasm32-unknown-unknown without JavaScript by @KodrAus in uuid-rs/uuid#794

Prepare for 1.13.0 release by @KodrAus in uuid-rs/uuid#795

Full Changelog: uuid-rs/uuid@1.12.1...1.13.0

Commits

5421417 Merge pull request #799 from uuid-rs/cargo/1.13.1
df58674 prepare for 1.13.1 release
f175242 Merge pull request #797 from bushrat011899/wasm32_atomics
65c31b3 Include CI Update
17673a1 Fix wasm32 with atomics
1cf1433 Merge pull request #795 from uuid-rs/cargo/1.13.0
ded7a1e prepare for 1.13.0 release
6494c4b Merge pull request #794 from uuid-rs/feat/getrandom-wasm32
9e7300c fix some warnings on various feature enablement
6c155b4 work around lack of dep:x and x/y feature support in 1.63
Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

@dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
@dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
@dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
@dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
@dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
@dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
@dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
@dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
@dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
@dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

pr-commenter · 2025-02-10T16:09:41Z

Regression Detector (DogStatsD)

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 9e4d4ca1-62fd-4c02-9ef6-7158788f0e0a

Baseline: 7.63.0-rc.2
Comparison: 7.63.0-rc.2

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials
➖	dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts	ingress throughput	+1.83	[+1.75, +1.91]	1
➖	dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only	memory utilization	+0.08	[-0.07, +0.23]	1
➖	dsd_uds_40mb_12k_contexts_40_senders	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.00, +0.00]	1
➖	dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.00, +0.00]	1
➖	dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.00, +0.00]	1
➖	dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.00, +0.00]	1
➖	dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.01, +0.01]	1
➖	dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.00, +0.00]	1
➖	dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_dualship	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.00, +0.00]	1
➖	dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.00, +0.00]	1
➖	dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.04, +0.04]	1
➖	quality_gates_idle_rss	memory utilization	-3.42	[-3.52, -3.33]	1

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	links
❌	quality_gates_idle_rss	memory_usage	0/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

pr-commenter · 2025-02-10T16:41:18Z

Regression Detector (Saluki)

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 074b99c9-aa03-44cf-bb79-fdf5b657dc83

Baseline: 258633d
Comparison: 014f2cc
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials
➖	quality_gates_idle_rss	memory utilization	+0.60	[+0.57, +0.63]	1
➖	dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit	ingress throughput	+0.38	[+0.10, +0.65]	1
➖	dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only	memory utilization	+0.06	[-0.04, +0.17]	1
➖	dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts	ingress throughput	+0.01	[-0.04, +0.06]	1
➖	dsd_uds_40mb_12k_contexts_40_senders	ingress throughput	+0.01	[-0.02, +0.04]	1
➖	dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.04, +0.04]	1
➖	dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.00, +0.00]	1
➖	dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_dualship	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.00, +0.00]	1
➖	dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.01, +0.01]	1
➖	dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.07, +0.07]	1
➖	dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts	ingress throughput	-0.01	[-0.02, +0.00]	1
➖	dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining_no_allocs	ingress throughput	-0.02	[-0.08, +0.04]	1
➖	dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts	ingress throughput	-0.02	[-0.06, +0.01]	1
➖	dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts	ingress throughput	-0.70	[-0.83, -0.57]	1

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	links
✅	quality_gates_idle_rss	memory_usage	10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

pr-commenter · 2025-02-10T16:41:54Z

Regression Detector Links

Experiment Result Links

experiment	link(s)
dsd_uds_100mb_250k_contexts	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_distributions_only	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_dualship	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_1mb_50k_contexts_memlimit	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_40mb_12k_contexts_40_senders	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
quality_gates_idle_rss	[Profiling (ADP)] [Profiling (DSD)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining (ADP only)	[Profiling (ADP)] [SMP Dashboard]
dsd_uds_50mb_10k_contexts_no_inlining_no_allocs (ADP only)	[Profiling (ADP)] [SMP Dashboard]

Bumps [uuid](https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid) from 1.12.1 to 1.13.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/releases) - [Commits](uuid-rs/uuid@1.12.1...1.13.1) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: uuid dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>

dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 15:51

dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file rust Pull requests that update Rust code labels Feb 10, 2025

dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/cargo/uuid-1.13.1 branch from 98abf2f to 014f2cc Compare February 10, 2025 21:01

tobz approved these changes Feb 10, 2025

View reviewed changes

tobz self-requested a review February 10, 2025 21:10

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

chore(deps): bump uuid from 1.12.1 to 1.13.1 #485

chore(deps): bump uuid from 1.12.1 to 1.13.1 #485

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Explanation

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

Explanation

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

chore(deps): bump uuid from 1.12.1 to 1.13.1 #485

Are you sure you want to change the base?

chore(deps): bump uuid from 1.12.1 to 1.13.1 #485

Conversation

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 10, 2025 • edited Loading

1.13.1

What's Changed

New Contributors

1.13.0

⚠️ Potential Breakage

no-std users who enable the rng feature

wasm32-unknown-unknown users who enable the rng feature without the js feature

What's Changed

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025 • edited Loading

Regression Detector (DogStatsD)

Regression Detector Results

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

Explanation

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025 • edited Loading

Regression Detector (Saluki)

Regression Detector Results

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

Explanation

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025 • edited Loading

Regression Detector Links

Experiment Result Links

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

no-std users who enable the `rng` feature

`wasm32-unknown-unknown` users who enable the `rng` feature without the `js` feature

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 10, 2025 •

edited

Loading