Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: revert CI fix #11807

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

ci: revert CI fix #11807

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

emmettbutler
Copy link
Collaborator

@emmettbutler emmettbutler commented Dec 19, 2024

This reverts commit fb82c64.

This merge commit
seems to have broken the suite-selection mechanism in CircleCI (example)

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

@emmettbutler emmettbutler requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2024 20:39
@emmettbutler emmettbutler requested review from erikayasuda, P403n1x87 and brettlangdon and removed request for erikayasuda December 19, 2024 20:39
Copy link
Contributor

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

scripts/gen_circleci_config.py                                          @DataDog/apm-core-python

@emmettbutler emmettbutler enabled auto-merge (squash) December 19, 2024 20:41
@emmettbutler emmettbutler added the changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR. label Dec 19, 2024
@emmettbutler emmettbutler changed the title fix(ci): Revert CI fix fix(ci): revert CI fix Dec 19, 2024
@emmettbutler emmettbutler added changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR. and removed changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR. labels Dec 19, 2024
@emmettbutler emmettbutler changed the title fix(ci): revert CI fix ci: revert CI fix Dec 19, 2024
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: emmett.butler/revert-circleci-fix
Commit report: 5e211b7
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 257 Passed, 1211 Skipped, 4m 34.04s Total duration (29m 7.99s time saved)

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-12-19 23:45:31

Comparing candidate commit ffd885a in PR branch emmett.butler/revert-circleci-fix with baseline commit 5cee25e in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 332 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

@emmettbutler emmettbutler merged commit 20b2b03 into main Dec 19, 2024
162 checks passed
@emmettbutler emmettbutler deleted the emmett.butler/revert-circleci-fix branch December 19, 2024 23:50
avara1986 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
Tests packages are failing in main on CircleCi due to timeout. We’re not
sure the root cause because the CI has been broken for over 7 days,
until #11807 reverted the changes. Making it nearly impossible to
pinpoint where the issue started in CircleCI. So, W've decided it's time
to migrate this to GitLab

CAVEAT: test_packages will only run on the main branch. Therefore, these
tests haven't been executed in this PR, but the [previous
commit](0cec964)
included a configuration to run them here to validate functionality
https://gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py/-/jobs/748795172


## Checklist
- [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
- The PR description includes an overview of the change
- The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
- The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing
strategy
- The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- The change follows the [library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
- The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
- Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))

## Reviewer Checklist
- [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met 
- Title is accurate
- All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance
implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants