Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable RTDC copier to accept list of features #247

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 25, 2024

Conversation

RaghavaAlajangi
Copy link
Contributor

@RaghavaAlajangi RaghavaAlajangi commented Jan 24, 2024

This pull request is aimed at enabling dclab.rtdc_dataset.copier to accept a list of feature strings that can be copied from the source RTDC file to the destination RTDC file.

This allows us to include a CLI option to write a specified list of features as mentioned in #246.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (6fef6c1) 91.27% compared to head (4f97b0a) 91.24%.

Files Patch % Lines
dclab/rtdc_dataset/copier.py 76.92% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #247      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.27%   91.24%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         115      115              
  Lines        7848     7856       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         7163     7168       +5     
- Misses        685      688       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@paulmueller paulmueller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @RaghavaAlajangi Please take a look at the changes I made. The tests did not pass.

@paulmueller paulmueller merged commit 03a84a0 into DC-analysis:master Jan 25, 2024
15 of 18 checks passed
@RaghavaAlajangi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dont we need tests for missing lines of code?

@paulmueller
Copy link
Member

Yes, would be good to have them. You up for another PR?

@RaghavaAlajangi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, I will create a new PR with those changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants