You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a separate issue from #266 to report repro inconsistencies in MOM6 standalone when comparing the 0.3.0 and 0.4.0 builds. The test case uses the current 025deg_jra55do_ryf configuration.
Below are the tests I’ve done. It seems that MOM6 from the latest 0.4.0 build does not reproduce the results from the 0.3.0 build.
— 0.3.0 build with default parameters -> porous true, RESOLN_N2_FILTER_DEPTH 2000m
1 Step, Day, Truncs, Energy/Mass, Maximum CFL, Mean Sea Level, Total Mass, Mean Salin, Mean Temp, Frac Mass Err, Salin Err, Temp Err
2 [days] [m2 s-2] [Nondim] [m] [kg] [PSU] [degC] [Nondim] [PSU] [degC]
3 0, 0.000, 0, En 6.2897884199659999E-22, CFL 0.00000, SL 6.8277E-10, M 1.36283E+21, S 34.7205, T 3.62 37, Me 0.00E+00, Se 0.00E+00, Te 0.00E+00
4 64, 1.000, 0, En 1.1750935298777954E-03, CFL 0.14497, SL 3.1646E-06, M 1.36283E+21, S 34.7205, T 3.62 37, Me 8.71E-10, Se 2.59E-08, Te -1.53E-07
— 0.4.0 build with porous true, RESOLN_N2_FILTER_DEPTH 2000m, OM4_SUBCELLS related False
1 Step, Day, Truncs, Energy/Mass, Maximum CFL, Mean Sea Level, Total Mass, Mean Salin, Mean Temp, Frac Mass Err, Salin Err, Temp Err
2 [days] [m2 s-2] [Nondim] [m] [kg] [PSU] [degC] [Nondim] [PSU] [degC]
3 0, 0.000, 0, En 6.2897884199659999E-22, CFL 0.00000, SL 6.8277E-10, M 1.36283E+21, S 34.7205, T 3.6237, Me 0.00E+00, Se 0.00E+00, Te 0.00E+00
4 64, 1.000, 0, En 1.1753522694683549E-03, CFL 0.14498, SL 3.1848E-06, M 1.36283E+21, S 34.7205, T 3.6237, Me 8.77E-10, Se 2.60E-08, Te -1.55E-07
— 0.4.0 build with porous false, RESOLN_N2_FILTER_DEPTH -1, OM4_SUBCELLS related False
1 Step, Day, Truncs, Energy/Mass, Maximum CFL, Mean Sea Level, Total Mass, Mean Salin, Mean Temp, Frac Mass Err, Salin Err, Temp Err
2 [days] [m2 s-2] [Nondim] [m] [kg] [PSU] [degC] [Nondim] [PSU] [degC]
3 0, 0.000, 0, En 6.2897884199659999E-22, CFL 0.00000, SL 6.8277E-10, M 1.36283E+21, S 34.7205, T 3.62 37, Me 0.00E+00, Se 0.00E+00, Te 0.00E+00
4 64, 1.000, 0, En 1.1750987892796693E-03, CFL 0.14497, SL 3.1687E-06, M 1.36283E+21, S 34.7205, T 3.62 37, Me 8.72E-10, Se 2.59E-08, Te -1.53E-07
— 0.4.0 build with default params -> porous false, RESOLN_N2_FILTER_DEPTH -1, OM4_SUBCELLS related True
1 Step, Day, Truncs, Energy/Mass, Maximum CFL, Mean Sea Level, Total Mass, Mean Salin, Mean Temp, Frac Mass Err, Salin Err, Temp Err
2 [days] [m2 s-2] [Nondim] [m] [kg] [PSU] [degC] [Nondim] [PSU] [degC]
3 0, 0.000, 0, En 6.2897884199659999E-22, CFL 0.00000, SL 6.8277E-10, M 1.36283E+21, S 34.7205, T 3.62 37, Me 0.00E+00, Se 0.00E+00, Te 0.00E+00
4 64, 1.000, 0, En 1.1750931033948509E-03, CFL 0.14495, SL 3.1620E-06, M 1.36283E+21, S 34.7205, T 3.62 37, Me 8.70E-10, Se 2.58E-08, Te -1.53E-07
— 0.4.0 build with default params -> porous true, RESOLN_N2_FILTER_DEPTH 2000, OM4_SUBCELLS related True
1 Step, Day, Truncs, Energy/Mass, Maximum CFL, Mean Sea Level, Total Mass, Mean Salin, Mean Temp, F rac Mass Err, Salin Err, Temp Err
2 [days] [m2 s-2] [Nondim] [m] [kg] [PSU] [degC] [Nondim] [PSU] [degC]
3 0, 0.000, 0, En 6.2897884199659999E-22, CFL 0.00000, SL 6.8277E-10, M 1.36283E+21, S 34.7205, T 3.623 7, Me 0.00E+00, Se 0.00E+00, Te 0.00E+00
4 64, 1.000, 0, En 1.1753392797242994E-03, CFL 0.14501, SL 3.1829E-06, M 1.36283E+21, S 34.7205, T 3.623 7, Me 8.76E-10, Se 2.60E-08, Te -1.55E-07
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One of the reasons for this was that our MOM6-standalone Cmake build system had a bug and many important compiler flags were not being set.
In addition, the following is the only parameter that needs to be added to MOM_input to preserve answers between the two version:
USE_HUYNH_STENCIL_BUG = True ! [Boolean] default = False
! If true, use a stencil width of 2 in PPM:H3 tracer advection. This is
! incorrect and will produce regressions in certain configurations, but may be
! required to reproduce results in legacy simulations.
I'm going to close this because with the above I can get the same answers from 0.3.0- and 0.4.0-era MOM6. Feel free to reopen if you don't think this is resolved
This is a separate issue from #266 to report repro inconsistencies in MOM6 standalone when comparing the 0.3.0 and 0.4.0 builds. The test case uses the current
025deg_jra55do_ryf
configuration.Below are the tests I’ve done. It seems that MOM6 from the latest 0.4.0 build does not reproduce the results from the 0.3.0 build.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: