Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CircleCI Commit #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

CircleCI Commit #1

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

Boomtokn
Copy link
Owner

@Boomtokn Boomtokn commented Feb 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced our automation pipeline by incorporating new processes for testing, building, deployment, and evaluation.
    • Streamlined workflows to coordinate these operations, ensuring a more reliable and consistent release process.

@Boomtokn Boomtokn self-assigned this Feb 13, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes add a new CircleCI configuration file using version 2.1. The file defines four jobs—test, build, deploy, and evals-test-assertions-job—all using the Docker image cimg/base:stable. Two workflows are established: the example workflow runs the test, build, and deploy jobs sequentially, while the test-eval-workflow runs the evaluation job. The configuration also integrates the circleci/evals@2.0 orb for evaluation tasks.

Changes

File Change Summary
.circleci/config.yml Added CircleCI configuration with jobs: test, build, deploy, & evals-test-assertions-job; workflows: example & test-eval-workflow; orb: circleci/evals@2.0.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant CI as CircleCI
    participant TestJob as Test Job
    participant BuildJob as Build Job
    participant DeployJob as Deploy Job

    Dev->>CI: Push commit with config.yml
    CI->>TestJob: Trigger test job
    TestJob-->>CI: Return test results
    CI->>BuildJob: Trigger build job
    BuildJob-->>CI: Return build artifact
    CI->>DeployJob: Trigger deploy job
    DeployJob-->>CI: Return deploy status
    CI->>Dev: Pipeline status update
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant CI as CircleCI
    participant EvalsJob as Evals Test Assertion Job

    Dev->>CI: Push commit with config.yml
    CI->>EvalsJob: Trigger evaluation job
    EvalsJob-->>CI: Return evaluation results
    CI->>Dev: Evaluation pipeline update
Loading

Poem

I'm a bunny with hops so spry,
New pipelines bring a twinkle to my eye.
Tests, builds, and deploys in a row,
Evaluations make the workflow glow.
I nibble on code with joyful glee 🐰,
Celebrating changes as happy as can be!


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Owner Author

@Boomtokn Boomtokn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commit

@Boomtokn Boomtokn merged commit 4a7ec25 into main Feb 13, 2025
3 of 8 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 525fb9a and 169f851.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .circleci/config.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.circleci/config.yml (1)

56-57: LGTM!

The orb configuration is correct and uses a specific version.

Comment on lines +31 to +39
evals-test-assertions-job:
docker:
- image: cimg/base:stable
steps:
- checkout
- evals/test:
assertions: assertions.json
metrics: eval_results.json
results: test_results.xml
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify the existence of required evaluation files.

The job references external files that might not exist in the repository.

Let's check for the required files:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for required evaluation files
echo "Checking for required files..."
for file in assertions.json eval_results.json test_results.xml; do
  if [ -f "$file" ]; then
    echo "✓ Found: $file"
  else
    echo "✗ Missing: $file"
  fi
done

Length of output: 550


Fix required: Missing evaluation files in job configuration.

The evals-test-assertions-job defined in .circleci/config.yml (lines 31-39) references the files assertions.json, eval_results.json, and test_results.xml, but verification confirmed that none of these files exist in the repository. Please either add these required evaluation files to the repository or update the job configuration to point to the correct files.

Comment on lines +40 to +55
workflows:
example:
jobs:
- test:
context: []
- build:
requires:
- test
context: []
- deploy:
requires:
- test
context: []
test-eval-workflow:
jobs:
- evals-test-assertions-job
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve workflow configuration.

Issues found:

  1. Workflow name "example" suggests this is template code
  2. The deploy job should depend on both test and build jobs
  3. Empty contexts can be omitted

Apply these improvements:

 workflows:
-  example:
+  main:
     jobs:
       - test:
-          context: []
       - build:
           requires:
             - test
-          context: []
       - deploy:
           requires:
             - test
+            - build
-          context: []
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
workflows:
example:
jobs:
- test:
context: []
- build:
requires:
- test
context: []
- deploy:
requires:
- test
context: []
test-eval-workflow:
jobs:
- evals-test-assertions-job
workflows:
main:
jobs:
- test:
- build:
requires:
- test
- deploy:
requires:
- test
- build
test-eval-workflow:
jobs:
- evals-test-assertions-job

Comment on lines +3 to +10
test:
docker:
- image: cimg/base:stable
steps:
- checkout
- run:
name: Run tests
command: echo 'replace me with real tests!' && false
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix the test job configuration.

The test job has critical issues:

  1. The test command is a placeholder that intentionally fails (false)
  2. The cimg/base:stable image might not have the required testing tools

Consider using a language-specific image (e.g., cimg/python) and implementing actual test commands. Example:

   test:
     docker:
-      - image: cimg/base:stable
+      - image: cimg/python:3.11
     steps:
       - checkout
       - run:
           name: Run tests
-          command: echo 'replace me with real tests!' && false
+          command: |
+            python -m pip install -e .
+            python -m pytest
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
test:
docker:
- image: cimg/base:stable
steps:
- checkout
- run:
name: Run tests
command: echo 'replace me with real tests!' && false
test:
docker:
- image: cimg/python:3.11
steps:
- checkout
- run:
name: Run tests
command: |
python -m pip install -e .
python -m pytest

Comment on lines +11 to +20
build:
docker:
- image: cimg/base:stable
steps:
- checkout
- run:
name: Build an artifact
command: touch example.txt
- store_artifacts:
path: example.txt
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Replace placeholder build steps with actual build process.

The build job creates a dummy artifact instead of building the actual project.

Consider using a language-specific image and implementing proper build steps. Example:

   build:
     docker:
-      - image: cimg/base:stable
+      - image: cimg/python:3.11
     steps:
       - checkout
       - run:
           name: Build an artifact
-          command: touch example.txt
+          command: |
+            python -m pip install build
+            python -m build
       - store_artifacts:
-          path: example.txt
+          path: dist/
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
build:
docker:
- image: cimg/base:stable
steps:
- checkout
- run:
name: Build an artifact
command: touch example.txt
- store_artifacts:
path: example.txt
build:
docker:
- image: cimg/python:3.11
steps:
- checkout
- run:
name: Build an artifact
command: |
python -m pip install build
python -m build
- store_artifacts:
path: dist/

Comment on lines +21 to +30
deploy:
docker:
- image: cimg/base:stable
steps:
- run:
name: deploy
command: "#e.g. ./deploy.sh"
- run:
name: found github actions config
command: ":"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

⚠️ Potential issue

🧩 Analysis chain

Fix deployment configuration and resolve CI system conflict.

Issues found:

  1. Missing checkout step
  2. Deployment command is commented out
  3. The presence of GitHub Actions config suggests duplicate CI setup

Let's verify if there's a GitHub Actions workflow:

Fix the deployment configuration:

   deploy:
     docker:
       - image: cimg/base:stable
     steps:
+      - checkout
       - run:
           name: deploy
-          command: "#e.g. ./deploy.sh"
+          command: |
+            # Add proper deployment steps here
+            echo "Implement deployment process"
-      - run:
-          name: found github actions config
-          command: ":"

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for GitHub Actions workflow files
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/

Length of output: 113


Fix deployment configuration and resolve potential CI duplication.

Issues to address:

  • Missing checkout step: Add a step to checkout the repository before running deployment commands.
  • Commented-out deployment command: Replace the placeholder command with an actual deployment sequence or a clear placeholder that outlines the required actions.
  • Redundant GitHub Actions step: The extra step referencing GitHub Actions (and the existence of workflows in .github/workflows/, namely codeql.yml and nowsecure-mobile-sbom.yml) suggests a potential overlap in CI configuration. Clarify whether both CircleCI and GitHub Actions are needed, and remove or adjust the extraneous step as appropriate.

Proposed diff for the deploy job in .circleci/config.yml:

   deploy:
     docker:
       - image: cimg/base:stable
     steps:
+      - checkout
       - run:
           name: deploy
-          command: "#e.g. ./deploy.sh"
+          command: |
+            # Add proper deployment steps here
+            echo "Implement deployment process"
-      - run:
-          name: found github actions config
-          command: ":"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
deploy:
docker:
- image: cimg/base:stable
steps:
- run:
name: deploy
command: "#e.g. ./deploy.sh"
- run:
name: found github actions config
command: ":"
deploy:
docker:
- image: cimg/base:stable
steps:
- checkout
- run:
name: deploy
command: |
# Add proper deployment steps here
echo "Implement deployment process"

@Boomtokn Boomtokn added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Feb 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant