Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow using POST for the api because GET made problems in Java #2

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

Onako2
Copy link
Contributor

@Onako2 Onako2 commented Dec 10, 2024

Current code shouldn't break :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced server functionality by allowing GET and POST requests for the /chatfilter, /user, /flagg_user, and /deflag_user endpoints.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved data handling for user ID, user name, and reason retrieval in user flagging functions.
    • Refined error handling to ensure proper handling of missing data in message and user checks.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to the server.py file of the Quart web server. The route definitions for several endpoints, including /chatfilter, /user, /flagg_user, and /deflag_user, have been updated to accept both GET and POST HTTP methods. Additionally, there are corrections in the add_flagged_user and remove_flagged_user functions regarding the retrieval of user data from the request. Error handling in the check_message and check_user functions has also been refined to ensure proper handling of missing data.

Changes

File Change Summary
server.py Updated route decorators for /chatfilter, /user, /flagg_user, and /deflag_user to accept both GET and POST methods. Corrected data retrieval in add_flagged_user and remove_flagged_user functions. Refined error handling in check_message and check_user functions.

Poem

🐇 In the server's cozy den,
Routes now dance with GET and POST again.
Flags and users, all in sight,
Handling errors, making it right.
Hops of joy, let's celebrate,
A smoother chat, oh, isn't it great! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
server.py (5)

Line range hint 98-102: Add proper input validation and error handling

The endpoint assumes all required fields exist in the request body without validation. This could lead to 500 errors if fields are missing.

     data = await request.get_json()
+    required_fields = ['key', 'message']
+    if not all(field in data for field in required_fields):
+        return {'error': 'Missing required fields'}, 400
+
     badwords = load_data("json/badwords.json")
     goodwords = load_data("json/goodwords.json")
     key_hash_list = load_data("json/key_hash.json")
     if hash_string(data["key"]) not in key_hash_list:
-        return {"error": "access denied"}
+        return {"error": "Access denied"}, 401

Line range hint 108-113: Improve error handling specificity

The bare except clause masks specific errors, making debugging difficult.

     try:
         cid = data["cid"]
         gid = data["gid"]
-    except:
+    except KeyError:
         cid = None
         gid = None

Line range hint 149-164: Fix critical data access bugs and improve security

The function contains several critical bugs in data access and security concerns:

  1. Incorrect dictionary access pattern causing KeyError
  2. Insufficient admin validation
  3. No input validation
 @server.route("/flagg_user", methods=["POST"])
 async def add_flagged_user():
     data = await request.get_json()
+    required_fields = ['key', 'user_id', 'user_name', 'reason']
+    if not all(field in data for field in required_fields):
+        return {'error': 'Missing required fields'}, 400
+
     admin_key_hash_list = load_data("json/admin_key_hash.json")
     ids_list = load_data("json/ids.json")
     if hash_string(data["key"]) not in admin_key_hash_list:
-        return {"error": "access denied"}
+        return {"error": "Access denied"}, 401

-    user_id = data[str(user_id)]["id"]
-    user_name = data[str(user_id)]["name"]
-    reason = data[str(user_id)]["reason"]
+    user_id = data["user_id"]
+    user_name = data["user_name"]
+    reason = data["reason"]

Line range hint 174-185: Fix critical data access bugs and improve security

The function contains similar critical bugs as the /flagg_user endpoint:

  1. Incorrect dictionary access pattern causing KeyError
  2. Insufficient admin validation
  3. No input validation
 @server.route("/deflag_user", methods=["POST"])
 async def remove_flagged_user():
     data = await request.get_json()
+    required_fields = ['key', 'user_id']
+    if not all(field in data for field in required_fields):
+        return {'error': 'Missing required fields'}, 400
+
     admin_key_hash_list = load_data("json/admin_key_hash.json")
     ids_list = load_data("json/ids.json")
     if hash_string(data["key"]) not in admin_key_hash_list:
-        return {"error": "access denied"}
+        return {"error": "Access denied"}, 401

-    user_id = data[str(user_id)]["id"]
+    user_id = data["user_id"]

Line range hint 93-190: Consider implementing security best practices

The current implementation could benefit from several security enhancements:

  1. Add rate limiting to prevent abuse
  2. Implement proper logging for security events (failed auth attempts, flagging operations)
  3. Use environment variables for sensitive configurations
  4. Consider implementing request validation middleware
  5. Add proper HTTP status codes for different error scenarios

Would you like me to provide example implementations for any of these security enhancements?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ed3b125 and f1f70f4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server.py (4 hunks)

@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ async def check_message():
return results


@server.route("/user")
@server.route("/user", methods=["GET", "POST"])
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add input validation and type checking

The endpoint needs proper input validation and type checking for the user_id field.

-@server.route("/user", methods=["GET", "POST"])
+@server.route("/user", methods=["POST"])
 async def check_user():
     # ... existing code ...
     data = await request.get_json()
+    required_fields = ['key', 'id']
+    if not all(field in data for field in required_fields):
+        return {'error': 'Missing required fields'}, 400
+
+    try:
+        user_id = int(data["id"])
+    except (ValueError, TypeError):
+        return {'error': 'Invalid user ID format'}, 400

Also applies to: 134-137

@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ def hash_string(string: str):
return hashed


@server.route("/chatfilter")
@server.route("/chatfilter", methods=["GET", "POST"])
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove GET method for endpoints accepting request body

The route accepts both GET and POST methods, but GET requests with a request body are not recommended as they may be:

  1. Stripped by some proxies
  2. Not properly handled by some HTTP clients
  3. Not compliant with HTTP/1.1 semantics
-@server.route("/chatfilter", methods=["GET", "POST"])
+@server.route("/chatfilter", methods=["POST"])
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
@server.route("/chatfilter", methods=["GET", "POST"])
@server.route("/chatfilter", methods=["POST"])

@rwolf2467 rwolf2467 merged commit 62b961a into AvoCloud-net:main Dec 10, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants