Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request - simplify agent relationship attributes #7651

Closed
Jegelewicz opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Feature Request - simplify agent relationship attributes #7651

Jegelewicz opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Display/Interface I don't like the way Arctos looks or it isn't working for me aesthetically. Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Agents Priority-Normal (Not urgent) Normal because this needs to get done but not immediately.

Comments

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member

Issue Documentation is http://handbook.arctosdb.org/how_to/How-to-Use-Issues-in-Arctos.html

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

The relationship attributes behave differently than all of the other agent attributes. This causes confusion and requires special handling.

image

Describe what you're trying to accomplish
A clear and concise overview of the goals; why are you asking for this?

Simplify

Describe the solution you'd like
How might we accomplish your goals?

Agent relationships should function the same way that status does.

  1. There is a single attribute = relationship
  2. attribute values are selected from a list of values:
    '''
    associate of
    bad duplicate of
    child of
    division of
    employee of
    established by
    grandchild of
    grandparent of
    not the same as
    parent of
    postdoctoral associate of
    relative of
    sibling of
    spouse of
    student of
    volunteer of
    '''
  3. related agent is placed in the related agent field.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

We can keep the current format, but I think it just complicates things.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

#7434

Priority
Please assign a priority-label. Unprioritized issues gets sent into a black hole of despair.

@Jegelewicz Jegelewicz added Priority-Normal (Not urgent) Normal because this needs to get done but not immediately. Function-Agents Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Display/Interface I don't like the way Arctos looks or it isn't working for me aesthetically. labels Apr 9, 2024
@Jegelewicz Jegelewicz added this to the Needs Discussion milestone Apr 9, 2024
@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member Author

Nobody has commented or seems to care. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Display/Interface I don't like the way Arctos looks or it isn't working for me aesthetically. Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Agents Priority-Normal (Not urgent) Normal because this needs to get done but not immediately.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant