-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove DotNetZip & Upgrade dependencies #41
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes across multiple project files involve updates to package references and versioning, including significant upgrades to Roslyn analyzers and C# workspaces. The Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Maple2.File.IO/Crypto/CryptoManager.cs (2)
15-15
: Simplify type casting and comparisonsCasting the result of
buffer.Read
toulong
and comparing it withstream.EncodedHeaderSize
can be simplified. Sincebuffer.Read
returns anint
, andstream.EncodedHeaderSize
is aulong
, it's better to caststream.EncodedHeaderSize
toint
if the sizes are guaranteed to be within theint
range. This simplifies the code and improves readability.Apply this diff to simplify the casting:
- if ((ulong) buffer.Read(src, 0, (int) stream.EncodedHeaderSize) == stream.EncodedHeaderSize) { + if (buffer.Read(src, 0, (int) stream.EncodedHeaderSize) == (int) stream.EncodedHeaderSize) {Repeat similar changes for lines 27 and 40.
Also applies to: 27-27, 40-40
37-37
: DisposeMemoryMappedViewStream
correctlyWhile the
using
declaration ensuresbuffer
is disposed, be cautious with the scope and lifetime of theMemoryMappedViewStream
to prevent potential memory leaks or access violations, especially in asynchronous or exception-prone contexts.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Maple2.File.Generator/Maple2.File.Generator.csproj
(1 hunks)Maple2.File.IO/Crypto/CryptoManager.cs
(1 hunks)Maple2.File.IO/Maple2.File.IO.csproj
(0 hunks)Maple2.File.Parser/Maple2.File.Parser.csproj
(2 hunks)Maple2.File.Tests/Maple2.File.Tests.csproj
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- Maple2.File.IO/Maple2.File.IO.csproj
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Maple2.File.Tests/Maple2.File.Tests.csproj (1)
18-20
: LGTM! Package versions are consistent and up-to-date.
The test package updates look good, with matching versions for MSTest packages and recent versions compatible with .NET 8.0.
Let's verify the compatibility and check for any breaking changes:
✅ Verification successful
Package versions are up-to-date and test patterns look standard
The verification shows:
- All packages are using the latest stable versions (17.11.1 for Test SDK, 3.6.3 for MSTest)
- Test methods follow standard MSTest patterns with no deprecated attributes
- No test initialization methods found that could be affected by breaking changes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check package compatibility and breaking changes
# Check if these versions are the latest stable ones
curl -s https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/microsoft.net.test.sdk/index.json | jq -r '.versions[]' | sort -V | tail -n 5
curl -s https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/mstest.testadapter/index.json | jq -r '.versions[]' | sort -V | tail -n 5
curl -s https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/mstest.testframework/index.json | jq -r '.versions[]' | sort -V | tail -n 5
# Search for MSTest [TestMethod] attributes to ensure no deprecated patterns
rg -g "*.cs" "^\s*\[TestMethod\]" ./Maple2.File.Tests/
# Look for potential breaking changes in test initialization
rg -g "*.cs" "^\s*\[TestInitialize\]" ./Maple2.File.Tests/
Length of output: 8990
Maple2.File.Generator/Maple2.File.Generator.csproj (2)
Line range hint 15-32
: Architectural Change: Moving from Compile to EmbeddedResource
Converting multiple source files from compiled code to embedded resources represents a significant architectural change. This affects how these attributes and interfaces are accessed and used:
- Could impact runtime performance (loading from resources vs compiled code)
- May complicate debugging and IDE support
- Changes how these types are referenced in dependent code
Please confirm:
- Is this change related to the removal of DotNetZip?
- How will consuming code access these types now that they're embedded resources?
- Have you considered the performance implications of loading these from resources?
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential impacts of moving these files to embedded resources
# Look for references to these types in the codebase
echo "Checking for usage of the embedded types..."
rg -l "M2dArrayAttribute|M2dNullableAttribute|M2dVector3Attribute|M2dFeatureLocaleAttribute|M2dEnumAttribute|M2dColorAttribute|IFeatureLocale|FeatureLocaleFilter"
# Check for any resource loading code that might be handling these new embedded resources
echo "Checking for resource loading mechanisms..."
rg "GetManifestResourceStream|Assembly\.GetExecutingAssembly\(\)\.GetManifestResourceStream"
11-12
: Verify compatibility with major version upgrades
The significant version jumps in Roslyn packages could introduce breaking changes:
- Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers: 3.3.3 → 3.11.0
- Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces: 4.2.0 → 4.11.0
✅ Verification successful
The shell script results show that the project doesn't contain any custom analyzers, code fix providers, or code refactoring providers that would be directly impacted by the Roslyn package updates. The project appears to be using these packages primarily for source generation capabilities, as evidenced by the various generator classes (XmlNullableGenerator, XmlVector3Generator, etc.).
Package updates are safe to proceed
The version upgrades for Microsoft.CodeAnalysis packages are safe as:
- No custom analyzers or code fix providers are present that could break
- The project uses these packages mainly for source generation
- No .ruleset or .editorconfig files that might need updates were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in the upgraded packages
# Check for any analyzer configurations that might need updates
rg -l "\.ruleset|\.editorconfig"
# Look for any custom analyzers or workspace configurations that might be affected
ast-grep --pattern 'DiagnosticAnalyzer|CodeFixProvider|CodeRefactoringProvider'
Length of output: 6237
Maple2.File.Parser/Maple2.File.Parser.csproj (2)
16-16
: Verify changelog for version 2.2.0
The package version has been bumped from 2.1.33 to 2.2.0, which indicates new features. Please ensure that a changelog exists documenting these changes.
39-42
: Clarify the package rename and potential breaking changes
The package reference has changed from Teronis.MSBuild.Packaging.ProjectBuildInPackage
to Tenekon.MSBuild.Packaging.ProjectBuildInPackage
with a major version bump (1.0.0 → 2.0.0). Please clarify:
- Is this a rename of the same package or a switch to a different package?
- What are the breaking changes introduced in version 2.0.0?
Maple2.File.IO/Crypto/CryptoManager.cs (1)
138-138
: Ensure proper handling of Zlib headers and footers
When manipulating the MemoryStream
for compression and decompression, it's important to accurately handle the Zlib headers and footers. Ensure that the offsets and lengths used when creating streams are correct and well-documented to avoid confusion and potential bugs.
Consider adding comments to explain the magic numbers used and verify that they correctly correspond to the Zlib specification.
Also applies to: 153-153
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores