2025-01-21-ram-data-decay-research-part2: add next step propositions

Signed-off-by: Krystian Hebel <krystian.hebel@3mdeb.com>

blog/content/post/2025-01-21-ram-data-decay-research-part2.md

@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ diagram has to be modified after a number of plots was already generated. It
 also has an option to export PNG versions, something that used to be done
 manually.
 
+With these changes, together with smaller improvements to performance and user
+experience, we believe that the tool is ready to use outside of our laboratory.
+Refer to the README in tool's repository for build and use instructions.
+
 ## Changes to methodology
 
 With rough idea about what to expect, we slightly modified (or rather specified
@@ -482,6 +486,13 @@ notable exception is 4 GB Kingston Fury KF432C16BB/4, where similar level of
 memory content loss was measured after about a minute. Interestingly, such
 results weren't reproduced for other DDR4 modules, even from the same vendor.
 
+All of the series were performed once. Ideally, they should be repeated few
+times for each configuration to rule out random measurement errors. This wasn't
+possible partially due to variations in ambient temperature that were outside of
+our control, especially over longer periods of time that were required to get
+full set of data. We could also repeat some tests for different units of the
+same model of memory modules.
+
 Unlock the full potential of your hardware and secure your firmware with the
 experts at 3mdeb! If you're looking to boost your product's performance and
 protect it from potential security threats, our team is here to help.