Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AUTO: auto exclude test example_functional #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2024
Merged

Conversation

2lambda123
Copy link
Owner

@2lambda123 2lambda123 commented Dec 31, 2024

Description

Related Issue

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Chore (non-breaking change that does not add functionality or fix an issue)

Checklist:

  • I have read the Code of Conduct
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • All commits are GPG signed

Summary by Sourcery

Tests:

  • Disable the example_functional test on ppc64le.

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Exclude the example_functional test from the test suite by adding a disable tag in the playlist.xml file.

Why are these changes being made?

This change addresses a specific issue as referenced in the GitHub issue link provided in the comment. The test is likely problematic or failing under certain conditions, and disabling it ensures the stability of the test suite until the issue is resolved.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated test configuration to include a comment referencing a GitHub issue for a disabled test case.

- related: adoptium/aqa-tests#4746 (comment)

Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

cr-gpt bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

Copy link

Processing PR updates...

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request disables the example_functional test to address intermittent failures as described in issue adoptium/aqa-tests#4746 (comment). The change is implemented by adding a new <disable> tag within the <disables> section of the playlist.xml file.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Disabled the example_functional test external/functional-test/playlist.xml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@gitginie gitginie bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in opening pull request.
Happy coding!

Copy link

git-greetings bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Thanks @2lambda123 for opening this PR!

For COLLABORATOR only :

  • To add labels, comment on the issue
    /label add label1,label2,label3

  • To remove labels, comment on the issue
    /label remove label1,label2,label3

Copy link

Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Important

Required App Permission Update

Noise Reduction Improvements

This update requests write permissions for Commit Statuses in order to send updates directly to your PRs without adding comments that spam notifications. Visit our changelog to learn more.

Click here to accept the updated permissions

To accept the updated permissions, sufficient privileges are required

Copy link

quine-bot bot commented Dec 31, 2024

👋 Figuring out if a PR is useful is hard, hopefully this will help.

  • @2lambda123 has been on GitHub since 2019 and in that time has had 2972 public PRs merged
  • They haven't contributed to this repo before
  • Here's a good example of their work: maybe-finance-maybe
  • From looking at their profile, they seem to be good with C and Makefile.

Their most recently public accepted PR is: 2lambda123/adoptium-temurin-build#1

Copy link

Description has been updated!

@2lambda123 2lambda123 merged commit 3b30feb into master Dec 31, 2024
12 of 18 checks passed
Copy link

git-greetings bot commented Dec 31, 2024

First PR by @2lambda123

PR Details of @2lambda123 in adoptium-aqa-tests :

OPEN CLOSED TOTAL
1 0 1

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the playlist.xml file in the external functional test directory by adding a new <disable> element to the example_functional test case. This addition includes a <comment> referencing a specific GitHub issue, providing context for why the test is currently disabled without changing the overall test configuration or structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
external/functional-test/playlist.xml Added a new <disable> element with a GitHub issue reference to the <disables> section of the example_functional test case

Poem

🐰 A test disabled, a rabbit's sigh
With XML tags neatly aligned
A GitHub issue now enshrined
In playlist's gentle, quiet cry
Functional tests take a rest tonight 🧪


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e86e40 and 177ca80.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • external/functional-test/playlist.xml (1 hunks)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codeautopilot bot commented Dec 31, 2024

PR summary

This Pull Request automatically excludes a specific test, example_functional, from being executed. The change is made by adding a <disable> tag in the playlist.xml file, referencing a related issue on GitHub. This suggests that the test is either problematic or not needed at the moment, and excluding it helps streamline the testing process or avoid known issues.

Suggestion

To improve the clarity of this change, it would be beneficial to include a more detailed comment within the <disable> tag explaining why the test is being excluded. This would help future developers understand the context without needing to refer to the external issue link. Additionally, ensure that the exclusion of this test does not inadvertently affect the overall test coverage or miss critical functionality checks.

Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect.

Current plan usage: 78.62%

Have feedback or need help?
Discord
Documentation
support@codeautopilot.com

Copy link

@gitginie gitginie bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in closing pull request.
Happy coding!

@labels-and-badges labels-and-badges bot added NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/XS Denotes a Pull Request that changes 0-9 lines. labels Dec 31, 2024
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @2lambda123 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • The new disable block is missing the platform specification. This will disable the test on all platforms instead of just ppc64le. Please add <platform>ppc64le_linux</platform> to the disable block.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Naming
Database Operations
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Systems and Environment
Objects and Data Structures
Readability and Maintainability
Asynchronous Processing
Design Patterns
Third-Party Libraries
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/XS Denotes a Pull Request that changes 0-9 lines. size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants